{"title":"判决分析2号/PDT. su -破产/2020 - PN。关于同性撤销请求的SMG","authors":"Nur Khasanah, Efi Yulistyowati, Agus Saiful Abib","doi":"10.26623/slr.v3i2.3974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Homologation is the ratification of reconciliation by the judge on the agreement between the debtor and creditor to end bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is one way to resolve debt disputes that smother a debtor, where the debtor no longer has the ability to pay his debts to his creditors. One of the bankruptcy decisions that will be studied in this research is the Semarang District Court Decision Number 2/Pdt.sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg. Regarding the request for cancellation of homologation, by discussing the problem of analyzing the judge's consideration in the decision of the Semarang District Court No.2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg regarding the Request for Cancellation of Homologation and its legal consequences. Based on this, the type of this research is normative juridical with a case approach, the research specification is descriptive and analytical. The data used is secondary data, which is taken by means of literature study and documentation study. The data is then analyzed qualitatively. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the consideration of the Panel of Judges to grant the Petitioner's request in the Decision of the Semarang District Court No.13/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2018.PN.Smg is correct because the Respondent was proven negligent/default in fulfilling the contents of the Homologation agreement agreed between PT.BMI TBK and PT.TS in their arrangement there are achievements that must be fulfilled by PT.TS, namely the payment of debt of 82% (eighty two percent) of the total principal debt of the Respondent to the Petitioner or the equivalent of Rp.106,604,576,766, - (one hundred six billion six hundred four million five hundred seventy six thousand seven hundred and sixty six Rupiah) no later than 6 (six months) from the date of the Homologation Decision This is in accordance with the contents of Article 170 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004. Legal consequences from the Semarang District Court Decision No.2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg PT.TS must be Bankrupt with all the legal consequences this is in accordance with Article 291 paragraph (2) of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU. Keywords : Decision, Court, Cancellation, Homologation.","PeriodicalId":442012,"journal":{"name":"Semarang Law Review (SLR)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SEMARANG NO.2/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2020/PN.SMG MENGENAI PERMOHONAN PEMBATALAN HOMOLOGASI\",\"authors\":\"Nur Khasanah, Efi Yulistyowati, Agus Saiful Abib\",\"doi\":\"10.26623/slr.v3i2.3974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Homologation is the ratification of reconciliation by the judge on the agreement between the debtor and creditor to end bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is one way to resolve debt disputes that smother a debtor, where the debtor no longer has the ability to pay his debts to his creditors. One of the bankruptcy decisions that will be studied in this research is the Semarang District Court Decision Number 2/Pdt.sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg. Regarding the request for cancellation of homologation, by discussing the problem of analyzing the judge's consideration in the decision of the Semarang District Court No.2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg regarding the Request for Cancellation of Homologation and its legal consequences. Based on this, the type of this research is normative juridical with a case approach, the research specification is descriptive and analytical. The data used is secondary data, which is taken by means of literature study and documentation study. The data is then analyzed qualitatively. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the consideration of the Panel of Judges to grant the Petitioner's request in the Decision of the Semarang District Court No.13/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2018.PN.Smg is correct because the Respondent was proven negligent/default in fulfilling the contents of the Homologation agreement agreed between PT.BMI TBK and PT.TS in their arrangement there are achievements that must be fulfilled by PT.TS, namely the payment of debt of 82% (eighty two percent) of the total principal debt of the Respondent to the Petitioner or the equivalent of Rp.106,604,576,766, - (one hundred six billion six hundred four million five hundred seventy six thousand seven hundred and sixty six Rupiah) no later than 6 (six months) from the date of the Homologation Decision This is in accordance with the contents of Article 170 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004. Legal consequences from the Semarang District Court Decision No.2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg PT.TS must be Bankrupt with all the legal consequences this is in accordance with Article 291 paragraph (2) of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU. Keywords : Decision, Court, Cancellation, Homologation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Semarang Law Review (SLR)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Semarang Law Review (SLR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v3i2.3974\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semarang Law Review (SLR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v3i2.3974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
【摘要】认定是法官对债务人与债权人达成的终止破产协议的和解予以认可。破产是解决令债务人窒息的债务纠纷的一种方式,即债务人不再有能力向债权人偿还债务。本研究将研究的破产判决之一是三宝垄地方法院第2号判决/ pd .sus- pailit /2020/PN.Smg。关于取消认可的请求,通过讨论分析三宝垄地方法院第2号/ pdt . su - pailit /2020/PN决定中法官的考虑问题。关于取消认证请求及其法律后果的通知。在此基础上,本研究的类型为规范法学与案例研究法,研究规范为描述性与分析性。所用资料为二手资料,采用文献研究法和文献研究法。然后对数据进行定性分析。根据这项研究的结果,可以得出结论,法官小组考虑批准三宝垄地方法院第13/ pdt . su - pkpu /2018.PN号决定中申诉人的请求。Smg是正确的,因为被申请人在履行PT.BMI TBK和PT.TS在他们的安排中达成的认可协议的内容方面被证明是疏忽/违约,所以PT.TS必须履行一些成就,即向申请人支付被申请人总债务的82%(82%)的债务或相当于Rp.106,604,576,766。根据2004年第37号法律第170条第(1)款的内容,自批准决定之日起不迟于6(6)个月。三宝垄地方法院第2号判决的法律后果/ pdt . su - pailit /2020/PN。根据《破产法》第291条第2款和PKPU的规定,Smg PT.TS必须破产,并承担一切法律后果。关键词:判决,法院,撤销,认可。
ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SEMARANG NO.2/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2020/PN.SMG MENGENAI PERMOHONAN PEMBATALAN HOMOLOGASI
ABSTRACT Homologation is the ratification of reconciliation by the judge on the agreement between the debtor and creditor to end bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is one way to resolve debt disputes that smother a debtor, where the debtor no longer has the ability to pay his debts to his creditors. One of the bankruptcy decisions that will be studied in this research is the Semarang District Court Decision Number 2/Pdt.sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg. Regarding the request for cancellation of homologation, by discussing the problem of analyzing the judge's consideration in the decision of the Semarang District Court No.2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg regarding the Request for Cancellation of Homologation and its legal consequences. Based on this, the type of this research is normative juridical with a case approach, the research specification is descriptive and analytical. The data used is secondary data, which is taken by means of literature study and documentation study. The data is then analyzed qualitatively. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the consideration of the Panel of Judges to grant the Petitioner's request in the Decision of the Semarang District Court No.13/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2018.PN.Smg is correct because the Respondent was proven negligent/default in fulfilling the contents of the Homologation agreement agreed between PT.BMI TBK and PT.TS in their arrangement there are achievements that must be fulfilled by PT.TS, namely the payment of debt of 82% (eighty two percent) of the total principal debt of the Respondent to the Petitioner or the equivalent of Rp.106,604,576,766, - (one hundred six billion six hundred four million five hundred seventy six thousand seven hundred and sixty six Rupiah) no later than 6 (six months) from the date of the Homologation Decision This is in accordance with the contents of Article 170 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004. Legal consequences from the Semarang District Court Decision No.2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg PT.TS must be Bankrupt with all the legal consequences this is in accordance with Article 291 paragraph (2) of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU. Keywords : Decision, Court, Cancellation, Homologation.