Michelle Yaputri Budiman
{"title":"Status Kepemilikan Bangunan dan Sarana di Atas Tanah Objek Build, Operate, And Transfer Dalam Kepailitan Pemilik Tanah","authors":"Michelle Yaputri Budiman","doi":"10.24123/YUSTIKA.V21I02.1688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capital and land constraints encourage parties to establish mutually supportive and profitable cooperative relationships, then manifested in the form of an agreements, one of them by Build, Operate, and Transfer Agreement (BOT). The possibility of a problem in the BOT agreement is quite large, for example when a BOT agreement is in progress, the Land Owner has a debt and can’t afford to pay the debt, then the land owner can be declared bankrupt based on the Commercial Court’s verdict. One of the cases is the bankruptcy of PT. X (as a land owner) in 2014, 21 years before the verdict, which is 1993, PT. X had a BOT agreement with PT. Y (as a builder). \nThe main issues in this thesis are: 1. Are the buildings and the golf courses built by the builder above the debtor’s land which is bound with BOT agreement which the debtor is declared bankrupt before the transfer, including in bankrupt assets?; and 2. What are the legal protection for the builder as the BOT receiver due to the bankruptcy of land owner? This research is a normative legal research uses statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. \nThe results of this research is the buildings and all the facilities which are built by the builder are not including in bankrupt assets because Indonesian Land Law adheres to the principle of horizontal separation, so as long as no transfer has occurred the land owner only has the land, the buildings and all things which are built by builder belong to the builder. The legal protection for the builder as the BOT receiver due to the bankruptcy of the land owner are the curator can continue the BOT agreement based on Article 36 Law of Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debts, make a novation, and the builder can file a compensation and then will become a concurrent creditor.","PeriodicalId":367058,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24123/YUSTIKA.V21I02.1688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

资金和土地限制鼓励各方建立相互支持和有利可图的合作关系,然后以协议的形式表现出来,其中之一是建设,运营和转让协议(BOT)。在BOT协议中出现问题的可能性是相当大的,例如当BOT协议正在进行时,土地所有者有债务并且无力偿还债务,那么根据商事法庭的判决,土地所有者可以被宣告破产。其中一个案例是,在判决21年前的2014年,即1993年,PT. X(作为土地所有者)与PT. Y(作为建筑商)签订了BOT协议。本文主要研究的问题有:1.数据挖掘;建筑商建造的建筑物和高尔夫球场是否位于债务人在转让前被宣布破产的受BOT协议约束的土地上,包括破产资产?和2。由于土地拥有人破产,作为BOT接收人的建造商有什么法律保障?本研究是一项规范性法律研究,采用成文法方法、概念方法和案例方法。本研究的结果是,由于印度尼西亚土地法坚持横向分离原则,建筑商建造的建筑物和所有设施不包括在破产资产中,因此只要没有发生转让,土地所有者只拥有土地,建筑物和建筑商建造的所有东西都属于建筑商。因土地所有人破产,建设单位作为BOT接管人的法律保护是:管理人可以依据《破产法》第三十六条继续履行BOT协议,进行革新,建设单位可以提出赔偿申请,成为共同债权人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Status Kepemilikan Bangunan dan Sarana di Atas Tanah Objek Build, Operate, And Transfer Dalam Kepailitan Pemilik Tanah
Capital and land constraints encourage parties to establish mutually supportive and profitable cooperative relationships, then manifested in the form of an agreements, one of them by Build, Operate, and Transfer Agreement (BOT). The possibility of a problem in the BOT agreement is quite large, for example when a BOT agreement is in progress, the Land Owner has a debt and can’t afford to pay the debt, then the land owner can be declared bankrupt based on the Commercial Court’s verdict. One of the cases is the bankruptcy of PT. X (as a land owner) in 2014, 21 years before the verdict, which is 1993, PT. X had a BOT agreement with PT. Y (as a builder). The main issues in this thesis are: 1. Are the buildings and the golf courses built by the builder above the debtor’s land which is bound with BOT agreement which the debtor is declared bankrupt before the transfer, including in bankrupt assets?; and 2. What are the legal protection for the builder as the BOT receiver due to the bankruptcy of land owner? This research is a normative legal research uses statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of this research is the buildings and all the facilities which are built by the builder are not including in bankrupt assets because Indonesian Land Law adheres to the principle of horizontal separation, so as long as no transfer has occurred the land owner only has the land, the buildings and all things which are built by builder belong to the builder. The legal protection for the builder as the BOT receiver due to the bankruptcy of the land owner are the curator can continue the BOT agreement based on Article 36 Law of Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debts, make a novation, and the builder can file a compensation and then will become a concurrent creditor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信