在解决皮尔卡达的直接争端时,建立特别司法机构的迫切需要

Yonata Harefa, Haposan Siallagan, Hisar Siregar
{"title":"在解决皮尔卡达的直接争端时,建立特别司法机构的迫切需要","authors":"Yonata Harefa, Haposan Siallagan, Hisar Siregar","doi":"10.51622/njlo.v1i01.342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In accordance with the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97 / PUU-XI / 2013, the Constitutional Court is no longer authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results, because the provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 Year 2008 NRI are against the Constitution of 1945. Article 157 paragraph (1) Law No. 8 Year 2015 determines that the dispute settlement on direct election results become the authority of specialized judiciary. But before a specialized judiciary is formed, then the Constitutional Court is authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results. The authority of the Constitutional Court is the constitutional authority to fulfill temporary legal vacuum (rechtvakum). Therefore legislators should immediately establish a specialized judiciary which has the authority to resolve the disputes on direct election results.","PeriodicalId":443920,"journal":{"name":"Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN BADAN PERADILAN KHUSUS DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HASIL PILKADA LANGSUNG\",\"authors\":\"Yonata Harefa, Haposan Siallagan, Hisar Siregar\",\"doi\":\"10.51622/njlo.v1i01.342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In accordance with the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97 / PUU-XI / 2013, the Constitutional Court is no longer authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results, because the provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 Year 2008 NRI are against the Constitution of 1945. Article 157 paragraph (1) Law No. 8 Year 2015 determines that the dispute settlement on direct election results become the authority of specialized judiciary. But before a specialized judiciary is formed, then the Constitutional Court is authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results. The authority of the Constitutional Court is the constitutional authority to fulfill temporary legal vacuum (rechtvakum). Therefore legislators should immediately establish a specialized judiciary which has the authority to resolve the disputes on direct election results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v1i01.342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v1i01.342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2015年第8号法第157条第(1)款规定,直接选举结果争端的解决成为专门司法机构的权力。但在专门司法机构成立之前,宪法法院被授权解决有关直接选举结果的争议。宪法法院的权力是填补临时法律真空的宪法权力。因此,立法者应立即建立一个专门的司法机构,有权解决有关直接选举结果的争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN BADAN PERADILAN KHUSUS DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HASIL PILKADA LANGSUNG
In accordance with the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97 / PUU-XI / 2013, the Constitutional Court is no longer authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results, because the provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 Year 2008 NRI are against the Constitution of 1945. Article 157 paragraph (1) Law No. 8 Year 2015 determines that the dispute settlement on direct election results become the authority of specialized judiciary. But before a specialized judiciary is formed, then the Constitutional Court is authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results. The authority of the Constitutional Court is the constitutional authority to fulfill temporary legal vacuum (rechtvakum). Therefore legislators should immediately establish a specialized judiciary which has the authority to resolve the disputes on direct election results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信