肯尼亚商业银行董事会特征与资本结构决策

Hiltommy Muthiani Mulwa, Fredrick W. S. Ndede
{"title":"肯尼亚商业银行董事会特征与资本结构决策","authors":"Hiltommy Muthiani Mulwa, Fredrick W. S. Ndede","doi":"10.35942/ijcfa.v3i2.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations in the modern society are faced with numerous challenges that require those in charge with governance to make effective decisions that enhance organizations’ overall performance and sustainability. One of the key decisions an organization’s board ought to make involve capital structure. Despite various research that have been conducted relating to board characteristics and capital structure, several authors concurs that the manner in which banks select the best capital structure, and the factors that influence their corporate financing behavior are not well understood. The main aim of this study therefore was to investigate board characteristics and capital structure decisions of commercial banks in Kenya. The study measured board characteristics with respect to board size, board diversity, board independence and board expertise while the capital structure decisions was gauged with capital structure ratio, that is, total debt ratio. These dimensions also formed the specific objectives of the study. The study assessed various literatures covering both theoretical and empirical that elaborates on the study variables providing more insight as well as identified gaps that needed to be filled. The study employed correlation design as it strived to demonstrate the causative connection between study variables. All selected commercial banks formed the target population with chief finance officers and internal auditors being the target respondents in these banks. The primary source of information was both primary and secondary data of this study whereby primary data collection instrument was the questionnaire whose reliability and validity was ensured before collecting data. Collected data was properly assessed and checked before conducting final analysis. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential analysis, which was aided by statistical package for social science and the outputs were presented in form of graphs, pie charts, frequency tables and narrations. The findings of the study showed a strong positive correlation between all the study measures as shown by R value of 0.824. From inferential analysis findings, the study concludes that on the overall all the board of directors’ characteristics studied had a significant influence on capital structure decisions of commercial banks in Kenya. The regression coefficients p-values were 0.000, 0.000, 0.002 and 0.001 consecutively which were all less than 0.05 indicating a significant relationship between board characteristics dimensions studied and capital structure decisions; therefore, all the null hypotheses were rejected. The study also established that capital structure of commercial banks in Kenya over a period of 5 years between 2013 and 2017 averaged at 0.841 which was less than 1.00, indicating that these banks finance their assets using equity as opposed to debts. As a result, the study concluded that board characteristics have a significant impact on capital structure decisions made by Kenyan commercial banks. Furthermore, commercial banks in Kenya regard financial flexibility as more important than the tax shelter advantage, implying aversion to debt and a proclivity to follow an inverted pecking order when it comes to external funds. The study therefore recommends that banks’ board and management should manage debt and equity levels rationally to enhance their performance; banks should select the right size of board with the right mix of expertise and diversity who will be able to monitor the management but will not interfere with or infringe on capital structure decisions; banks should also increase board independence in order to benefit from the skills and expatriates of these board members; and finally a selection of banks’ board with divergent skills and qualifications so that banks can reap from the heterogeneity of educational backgrounds and competences.","PeriodicalId":119077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Aspects in Finance, Banking and Accounting","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Board Characteristics and Capital Structure Decisions of Commercial Banks in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Hiltommy Muthiani Mulwa, Fredrick W. S. Ndede\",\"doi\":\"10.35942/ijcfa.v3i2.222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organizations in the modern society are faced with numerous challenges that require those in charge with governance to make effective decisions that enhance organizations’ overall performance and sustainability. One of the key decisions an organization’s board ought to make involve capital structure. Despite various research that have been conducted relating to board characteristics and capital structure, several authors concurs that the manner in which banks select the best capital structure, and the factors that influence their corporate financing behavior are not well understood. The main aim of this study therefore was to investigate board characteristics and capital structure decisions of commercial banks in Kenya. The study measured board characteristics with respect to board size, board diversity, board independence and board expertise while the capital structure decisions was gauged with capital structure ratio, that is, total debt ratio. These dimensions also formed the specific objectives of the study. The study assessed various literatures covering both theoretical and empirical that elaborates on the study variables providing more insight as well as identified gaps that needed to be filled. The study employed correlation design as it strived to demonstrate the causative connection between study variables. All selected commercial banks formed the target population with chief finance officers and internal auditors being the target respondents in these banks. The primary source of information was both primary and secondary data of this study whereby primary data collection instrument was the questionnaire whose reliability and validity was ensured before collecting data. Collected data was properly assessed and checked before conducting final analysis. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential analysis, which was aided by statistical package for social science and the outputs were presented in form of graphs, pie charts, frequency tables and narrations. The findings of the study showed a strong positive correlation between all the study measures as shown by R value of 0.824. From inferential analysis findings, the study concludes that on the overall all the board of directors’ characteristics studied had a significant influence on capital structure decisions of commercial banks in Kenya. The regression coefficients p-values were 0.000, 0.000, 0.002 and 0.001 consecutively which were all less than 0.05 indicating a significant relationship between board characteristics dimensions studied and capital structure decisions; therefore, all the null hypotheses were rejected. The study also established that capital structure of commercial banks in Kenya over a period of 5 years between 2013 and 2017 averaged at 0.841 which was less than 1.00, indicating that these banks finance their assets using equity as opposed to debts. As a result, the study concluded that board characteristics have a significant impact on capital structure decisions made by Kenyan commercial banks. Furthermore, commercial banks in Kenya regard financial flexibility as more important than the tax shelter advantage, implying aversion to debt and a proclivity to follow an inverted pecking order when it comes to external funds. The study therefore recommends that banks’ board and management should manage debt and equity levels rationally to enhance their performance; banks should select the right size of board with the right mix of expertise and diversity who will be able to monitor the management but will not interfere with or infringe on capital structure decisions; banks should also increase board independence in order to benefit from the skills and expatriates of these board members; and finally a selection of banks’ board with divergent skills and qualifications so that banks can reap from the heterogeneity of educational backgrounds and competences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Current Aspects in Finance, Banking and Accounting\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Current Aspects in Finance, Banking and Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35942/ijcfa.v3i2.222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Aspects in Finance, Banking and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35942/ijcfa.v3i2.222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代社会的组织面临着许多挑战,这些挑战要求那些负责治理的人做出有效的决策,以提高组织的整体绩效和可持续性。公司董事会应该做出的关键决策之一涉及资本结构。尽管已经进行了各种关于董事会特征和资本结构的研究,但一些作者一致认为,银行选择最佳资本结构的方式以及影响其公司融资行为的因素尚未得到很好的理解。因此,本研究的主要目的是调查肯尼亚商业银行的董事会特征和资本结构决策。该研究从董事会规模、董事会多样性、董事会独立性和董事会专业知识等方面衡量董事会特征,而以资本结构比率(即总负债率)衡量资本结构决策。这些方面也构成了本研究的具体目标。该研究评估了涵盖理论和实证的各种文献,详细阐述了研究变量,提供了更多的见解,并确定了需要填补的空白。本研究采用相关设计,试图证明研究变量之间的因果关系。所有选定的商业银行组成了目标人群,首席财务官和内部审计师是这些银行的目标受访者。信息的主要来源是本研究的一手数据和二手数据,主要的数据收集工具是问卷,在收集数据之前,问卷的信度和效度都得到了保证。在进行最终分析之前,对收集到的数据进行了适当的评估和检查。数据分析采用描述性和推理分析,并辅以社会科学统计软件包,输出以图形、饼图、频率表和叙述的形式呈现。本研究的结果显示,各研究指标之间存在较强的正相关,R值为0.824。从推论分析结果来看,研究得出结论:总体而言,所研究的所有董事会特征对肯尼亚商业银行的资本结构决策都有显著影响。回归系数p值依次为0.000、0.000、0.002和0.001,均小于0.05,表明所研究的董事会特征维度与资本结构决策之间存在显著关系;因此,所有的零假设都被拒绝。该研究还确定,2013年至2017年5年间,肯尼亚商业银行的资本结构平均为0.841,低于1.00,表明这些银行使用股权而不是债务为其资产融资。因此,研究得出结论,董事会特征对肯尼亚商业银行的资本结构决策有显著影响。此外,肯尼亚的商业银行认为财务灵活性比避税优势更重要,这意味着他们厌恶债务,并倾向于在外部资金方面遵循颠倒的等级顺序。因此,研究建议银行董事会和管理层应合理管理债务和股权水平,以提高绩效;银行应该选择合适的董事会规模,专业知识和多样性的适当组合,他们将能够监督管理层,但不会干涉或侵犯资本结构的决定;银行还应提高董事会的独立性,以便从这些董事会成员的技能和外派人员中获益;最后,挑选具有不同技能和资格的银行董事会成员,以便银行能够从教育背景和能力的异质性中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Board Characteristics and Capital Structure Decisions of Commercial Banks in Kenya
Organizations in the modern society are faced with numerous challenges that require those in charge with governance to make effective decisions that enhance organizations’ overall performance and sustainability. One of the key decisions an organization’s board ought to make involve capital structure. Despite various research that have been conducted relating to board characteristics and capital structure, several authors concurs that the manner in which banks select the best capital structure, and the factors that influence their corporate financing behavior are not well understood. The main aim of this study therefore was to investigate board characteristics and capital structure decisions of commercial banks in Kenya. The study measured board characteristics with respect to board size, board diversity, board independence and board expertise while the capital structure decisions was gauged with capital structure ratio, that is, total debt ratio. These dimensions also formed the specific objectives of the study. The study assessed various literatures covering both theoretical and empirical that elaborates on the study variables providing more insight as well as identified gaps that needed to be filled. The study employed correlation design as it strived to demonstrate the causative connection between study variables. All selected commercial banks formed the target population with chief finance officers and internal auditors being the target respondents in these banks. The primary source of information was both primary and secondary data of this study whereby primary data collection instrument was the questionnaire whose reliability and validity was ensured before collecting data. Collected data was properly assessed and checked before conducting final analysis. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential analysis, which was aided by statistical package for social science and the outputs were presented in form of graphs, pie charts, frequency tables and narrations. The findings of the study showed a strong positive correlation between all the study measures as shown by R value of 0.824. From inferential analysis findings, the study concludes that on the overall all the board of directors’ characteristics studied had a significant influence on capital structure decisions of commercial banks in Kenya. The regression coefficients p-values were 0.000, 0.000, 0.002 and 0.001 consecutively which were all less than 0.05 indicating a significant relationship between board characteristics dimensions studied and capital structure decisions; therefore, all the null hypotheses were rejected. The study also established that capital structure of commercial banks in Kenya over a period of 5 years between 2013 and 2017 averaged at 0.841 which was less than 1.00, indicating that these banks finance their assets using equity as opposed to debts. As a result, the study concluded that board characteristics have a significant impact on capital structure decisions made by Kenyan commercial banks. Furthermore, commercial banks in Kenya regard financial flexibility as more important than the tax shelter advantage, implying aversion to debt and a proclivity to follow an inverted pecking order when it comes to external funds. The study therefore recommends that banks’ board and management should manage debt and equity levels rationally to enhance their performance; banks should select the right size of board with the right mix of expertise and diversity who will be able to monitor the management but will not interfere with or infringe on capital structure decisions; banks should also increase board independence in order to benefit from the skills and expatriates of these board members; and finally a selection of banks’ board with divergent skills and qualifications so that banks can reap from the heterogeneity of educational backgrounds and competences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信