Peter Xiang Gao, Akshay Narayan, Gautam Kumar, R. Agarwal, S. Ratnasamy, S. Shenker
{"title":"pHost:在商品网络结构上分布的近乎最佳的数据中心传输","authors":"Peter Xiang Gao, Akshay Narayan, Gautam Kumar, R. Agarwal, S. Ratnasamy, S. Shenker","doi":"10.1145/2716281.2836086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of minimizing flow completion times (FCT) in datacenters has led to a growing literature on new network transport designs. Of particular note is pFabric, a protocol that achieves near-optimal FCTs. However, pFabric's performance comes at the cost of generality, since pFabric requires specialized hardware that embeds a specific scheduling policy within the network fabric, making it hard to meet diverse policy goals. Aiming for generality, the recent Fastpass proposal returns to a design based on commodity network hardware and instead relies on a centralized scheduler. Fastpass achieves generality, but (as we show) loses many of pFabric's performance benefits. We present pHost, a new transport design aimed at achieving both: the near-optimal performance of pFabric and the commodity network design of Fastpass. Similar to Fastpass, pHost keeps the network simple by decoupling the network fabric from scheduling decisions. However, pHost introduces a new distributed protocol that allows end-hosts to directly make scheduling decisions, thus avoiding the overheads of Fastpass's centralized scheduler architecture. We show that pHost achieves performance on par with pFabric (within 4% for typical conditions) and significantly outperforms Fastpass (by a factor of 3.8×) while relying only on commodity network hardware.","PeriodicalId":169539,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"179","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"pHost: distributed near-optimal datacenter transport over commodity network fabric\",\"authors\":\"Peter Xiang Gao, Akshay Narayan, Gautam Kumar, R. Agarwal, S. Ratnasamy, S. Shenker\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2716281.2836086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The importance of minimizing flow completion times (FCT) in datacenters has led to a growing literature on new network transport designs. Of particular note is pFabric, a protocol that achieves near-optimal FCTs. However, pFabric's performance comes at the cost of generality, since pFabric requires specialized hardware that embeds a specific scheduling policy within the network fabric, making it hard to meet diverse policy goals. Aiming for generality, the recent Fastpass proposal returns to a design based on commodity network hardware and instead relies on a centralized scheduler. Fastpass achieves generality, but (as we show) loses many of pFabric's performance benefits. We present pHost, a new transport design aimed at achieving both: the near-optimal performance of pFabric and the commodity network design of Fastpass. Similar to Fastpass, pHost keeps the network simple by decoupling the network fabric from scheduling decisions. However, pHost introduces a new distributed protocol that allows end-hosts to directly make scheduling decisions, thus avoiding the overheads of Fastpass's centralized scheduler architecture. We show that pHost achieves performance on par with pFabric (within 4% for typical conditions) and significantly outperforms Fastpass (by a factor of 3.8×) while relying only on commodity network hardware.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"179\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2716281.2836086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2716281.2836086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
pHost: distributed near-optimal datacenter transport over commodity network fabric
The importance of minimizing flow completion times (FCT) in datacenters has led to a growing literature on new network transport designs. Of particular note is pFabric, a protocol that achieves near-optimal FCTs. However, pFabric's performance comes at the cost of generality, since pFabric requires specialized hardware that embeds a specific scheduling policy within the network fabric, making it hard to meet diverse policy goals. Aiming for generality, the recent Fastpass proposal returns to a design based on commodity network hardware and instead relies on a centralized scheduler. Fastpass achieves generality, but (as we show) loses many of pFabric's performance benefits. We present pHost, a new transport design aimed at achieving both: the near-optimal performance of pFabric and the commodity network design of Fastpass. Similar to Fastpass, pHost keeps the network simple by decoupling the network fabric from scheduling decisions. However, pHost introduces a new distributed protocol that allows end-hosts to directly make scheduling decisions, thus avoiding the overheads of Fastpass's centralized scheduler architecture. We show that pHost achieves performance on par with pFabric (within 4% for typical conditions) and significantly outperforms Fastpass (by a factor of 3.8×) while relying only on commodity network hardware.