银行法- PPSA互动:仍在等待解决方案

R. Wood
{"title":"银行法- PPSA互动:仍在等待解决方案","authors":"R. Wood","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1978545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The co-existence of a federal secured transactions regime (Bank Act security) and a provincial personal property security system (the PPSA) has given rise to a number of difficulties concerning the resolution of priorities. There has been a recent burst of activity – two Supreme Court of Canada decisions in 2010 followed by a federal legislative response in the form of an amendment to the Bank Act provisions, which the government expects to put in place by April 2012. Unfortunately, this latest legislative amendment is wholly inadequate. The new priority rule fails to confront the fundamental root of the problem: the fact that the priority mechanisms of the two regimes are based on two radically different ideas. It is a band aid solution that does not resolve the lack of compatibility between the two systems, but which will produce new interpretive problems and generate more litigation. As a consequence, many of the significant transactional efficiencies introduced by the modernization of provincial secured transactions law are severely compromised.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bank Act – PPSA Interaction: Still Waiting for Solutions\",\"authors\":\"R. Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1978545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The co-existence of a federal secured transactions regime (Bank Act security) and a provincial personal property security system (the PPSA) has given rise to a number of difficulties concerning the resolution of priorities. There has been a recent burst of activity – two Supreme Court of Canada decisions in 2010 followed by a federal legislative response in the form of an amendment to the Bank Act provisions, which the government expects to put in place by April 2012. Unfortunately, this latest legislative amendment is wholly inadequate. The new priority rule fails to confront the fundamental root of the problem: the fact that the priority mechanisms of the two regimes are based on two radically different ideas. It is a band aid solution that does not resolve the lack of compatibility between the two systems, but which will produce new interpretive problems and generate more litigation. As a consequence, many of the significant transactional efficiencies introduced by the modernization of provincial secured transactions law are severely compromised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1978545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1978545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联邦担保交易制度(《银行法》担保)和省级个人财产担保制度(PPSA)的共存在解决优先事项方面造成了一些困难。最近出现了一系列活动——2010年加拿大最高法院做出了两项裁决,随后联邦立法机构以银行法条款修正案的形式作出回应,政府预计将于2012年4月实施。不幸的是,这项最新的立法修正案完全不够。新的优先规则未能直面问题的根本根源:两个政权的优先机制基于两种截然不同的理念。这是一种权宜之计,并不能解决两种制度之间缺乏兼容性的问题,反而会产生新的解释问题,引发更多的诉讼。因此,省担保交易法现代化所带来的许多重要交易效率受到严重损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bank Act – PPSA Interaction: Still Waiting for Solutions
The co-existence of a federal secured transactions regime (Bank Act security) and a provincial personal property security system (the PPSA) has given rise to a number of difficulties concerning the resolution of priorities. There has been a recent burst of activity – two Supreme Court of Canada decisions in 2010 followed by a federal legislative response in the form of an amendment to the Bank Act provisions, which the government expects to put in place by April 2012. Unfortunately, this latest legislative amendment is wholly inadequate. The new priority rule fails to confront the fundamental root of the problem: the fact that the priority mechanisms of the two regimes are based on two radically different ideas. It is a band aid solution that does not resolve the lack of compatibility between the two systems, but which will produce new interpretive problems and generate more litigation. As a consequence, many of the significant transactional efficiencies introduced by the modernization of provincial secured transactions law are severely compromised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信