西陀思妥耶夫斯基的后现代主义者与化身诗学

S. Evdokimova
{"title":"西陀思妥耶夫斯基的后现代主义者与化身诗学","authors":"S. Evdokimova","doi":"10.1515/9781644690291-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Struggle over Aesthetic Ideals “Alyosha, do you believe than I am not merely a buffoon?—I do believe that you are not merely a buffoon.”1 With these words Dostoevsky undoubtedly anticipated the reader’s temptation to view Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov as nothing more than a buffoon, for the characters in the novel, including Karamazov the father himself, and the narrator of The Brothers Karamazov frequently refer to Fyodor’s scandalous behaviour as buffoonery. I propose, however, to consider Fyodor not only as a traditional carnivalesque fool but as a character who poses questions of modern aesthetics. I interpret his behavior as artifice in the context of Dostoevsky’s critique of the modern crisis of artistic representation. As it has been frequently pointed out, the philosophical thought of Dostoevsky owes a great deal to the Platonic tradition. I suggest that the contradictory aesthetic ideas expressed in Th e Brothers Karamazov reflect the crisis of Platonic aesthetics and of Romantic representation. The “Pro et Contra” of The Brothers","PeriodicalId":115810,"journal":{"name":"Dostoevsky Beyond Dostoevsky","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"XI. Dostoevsky’s Postmodernists and the Poetics of Incarnation\",\"authors\":\"S. Evdokimova\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9781644690291-013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Struggle over Aesthetic Ideals “Alyosha, do you believe than I am not merely a buffoon?—I do believe that you are not merely a buffoon.”1 With these words Dostoevsky undoubtedly anticipated the reader’s temptation to view Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov as nothing more than a buffoon, for the characters in the novel, including Karamazov the father himself, and the narrator of The Brothers Karamazov frequently refer to Fyodor’s scandalous behaviour as buffoonery. I propose, however, to consider Fyodor not only as a traditional carnivalesque fool but as a character who poses questions of modern aesthetics. I interpret his behavior as artifice in the context of Dostoevsky’s critique of the modern crisis of artistic representation. As it has been frequently pointed out, the philosophical thought of Dostoevsky owes a great deal to the Platonic tradition. I suggest that the contradictory aesthetic ideas expressed in Th e Brothers Karamazov reflect the crisis of Platonic aesthetics and of Romantic representation. The “Pro et Contra” of The Brothers\",\"PeriodicalId\":115810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dostoevsky Beyond Dostoevsky\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dostoevsky Beyond Dostoevsky\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781644690291-013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dostoevsky Beyond Dostoevsky","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781644690291-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“阿廖沙,你相信我不只是一个小丑吗?”-我相信你不只是一个小丑。用这些话,陀思妥耶夫斯基无疑预见到读者的诱惑,认为费奥多尔·帕夫洛维奇·卡拉马佐夫只不过是一个小丑,因为小说中的人物,包括卡拉马佐夫的父亲本人,以及《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》的叙述者经常把费奥多尔的丑闻行为称为小丑。然而,我认为费奥多尔不仅是一个传统的狂欢节式的傻瓜,而且是一个提出现代美学问题的人物。在陀思妥耶夫斯基批判现代艺术表现危机的背景下,我把他的行为解释为技巧。正如人们经常指出的那样,陀思妥耶夫斯基的哲学思想在很大程度上受到柏拉图传统的影响。我认为,《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》中所表达的矛盾的美学思想反映了柏拉图美学和浪漫主义表现的危机。兄弟会的"支持与反对
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
XI. Dostoevsky’s Postmodernists and the Poetics of Incarnation
The Struggle over Aesthetic Ideals “Alyosha, do you believe than I am not merely a buffoon?—I do believe that you are not merely a buffoon.”1 With these words Dostoevsky undoubtedly anticipated the reader’s temptation to view Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov as nothing more than a buffoon, for the characters in the novel, including Karamazov the father himself, and the narrator of The Brothers Karamazov frequently refer to Fyodor’s scandalous behaviour as buffoonery. I propose, however, to consider Fyodor not only as a traditional carnivalesque fool but as a character who poses questions of modern aesthetics. I interpret his behavior as artifice in the context of Dostoevsky’s critique of the modern crisis of artistic representation. As it has been frequently pointed out, the philosophical thought of Dostoevsky owes a great deal to the Platonic tradition. I suggest that the contradictory aesthetic ideas expressed in Th e Brothers Karamazov reflect the crisis of Platonic aesthetics and of Romantic representation. The “Pro et Contra” of The Brothers
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信