1999年后巴尔干地区区域合作模式:欧洲经验及其应用

D. Djukanovic, M. Dašić
{"title":"1999年后巴尔干地区区域合作模式:欧洲经验及其应用","authors":"D. Djukanovic, M. Dašić","doi":"10.2298/medjp2104617d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the authors comparatively analyze the development of regional\n cooperation in Europe after the Second World War and in the Western Balkans\n since 1999. They compare and contrast regional cooperation in the Western\n Balkans (with a particular focus on the period after 2006, when the\n Stability Pact for Southeastern Europe was transformed into the Regional\n Cooperation Council, and after 2014, when the Berlin Process was launched)\n with similar forms of cooperation in Europe, such as the Nordic Council of\n Ministers, the Visegrad Group, and the Benelux. Therefore, the authors\n approach a comparative analysis of the composition of these regional forums\n and their areas of cooperation with the Regional Cooperation Council, the\n Southeast European Cooperation Process, and the Berlin Process. In this\n regard, the authors state that there are more than obvious similarities\n between regional cooperation in the Western Balkans, primarily with the\n Visegrad Group, and to a significant extent with the Benelux. Regional\n cooperation on the Balkan Peninsula and between the Nordic countries is\n similar to a lesser extent, owing to the absence of the formation of the\n Parliamentary Assembly of the Western Balkans, which was overlooked in 2013.\n The authors conclude that there are numerous obstacles to establishin g more\n intensive and deeper regional cooperation in the Western Balkans, the most\n significant of which are the lack of a multilaterally accepted regional\n identity, the different interests of regional leaders regarding its\n \"originality\", the conflicted views of dominant opinions, and the\n predominant influences of various Western actors.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling regional cooperation in the Balkans after 1999: European experiences and their application\",\"authors\":\"D. Djukanovic, M. Dašić\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/medjp2104617d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the authors comparatively analyze the development of regional\\n cooperation in Europe after the Second World War and in the Western Balkans\\n since 1999. They compare and contrast regional cooperation in the Western\\n Balkans (with a particular focus on the period after 2006, when the\\n Stability Pact for Southeastern Europe was transformed into the Regional\\n Cooperation Council, and after 2014, when the Berlin Process was launched)\\n with similar forms of cooperation in Europe, such as the Nordic Council of\\n Ministers, the Visegrad Group, and the Benelux. Therefore, the authors\\n approach a comparative analysis of the composition of these regional forums\\n and their areas of cooperation with the Regional Cooperation Council, the\\n Southeast European Cooperation Process, and the Berlin Process. In this\\n regard, the authors state that there are more than obvious similarities\\n between regional cooperation in the Western Balkans, primarily with the\\n Visegrad Group, and to a significant extent with the Benelux. Regional\\n cooperation on the Balkan Peninsula and between the Nordic countries is\\n similar to a lesser extent, owing to the absence of the formation of the\\n Parliamentary Assembly of the Western Balkans, which was overlooked in 2013.\\n The authors conclude that there are numerous obstacles to establishin g more\\n intensive and deeper regional cooperation in the Western Balkans, the most\\n significant of which are the lack of a multilaterally accepted regional\\n identity, the different interests of regional leaders regarding its\\n \\\"originality\\\", the conflicted views of dominant opinions, and the\\n predominant influences of various Western actors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":316095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medjunarodni problemi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medjunarodni problemi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2104617d\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2104617d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较分析了二战后欧洲区域合作与1999年以来西巴尔干地区区域合作的发展。他们将西巴尔干地区的区域合作(特别关注2006年之后,东南欧稳定公约转变为区域合作理事会,2014年之后,柏林进程启动)与欧洲类似形式的合作,如北欧部长理事会、维谢格拉德集团和比荷卢经济联盟进行了比较和对比。因此,作者对这些区域论坛的组成及其与区域合作理事会、东南欧合作进程和柏林进程的合作领域进行了比较分析。在这方面,作者指出,西巴尔干地区的区域合作,主要是与维谢格拉德集团的合作,以及在很大程度上与比荷卢经济联盟的合作,有非常明显的相似之处。巴尔干半岛和北欧国家之间的区域合作在较小程度上相似,原因是2013年忽略了西巴尔干议会大会的成立。作者的结论是,在西巴尔干地区建立更密集和更深入的区域合作存在许多障碍,其中最重要的障碍是缺乏多边接受的区域特征,区域领导人对其"原创性"的不同利益,主流意见的相互冲突以及各种西方行动者的主要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling regional cooperation in the Balkans after 1999: European experiences and their application
In this paper, the authors comparatively analyze the development of regional cooperation in Europe after the Second World War and in the Western Balkans since 1999. They compare and contrast regional cooperation in the Western Balkans (with a particular focus on the period after 2006, when the Stability Pact for Southeastern Europe was transformed into the Regional Cooperation Council, and after 2014, when the Berlin Process was launched) with similar forms of cooperation in Europe, such as the Nordic Council of Ministers, the Visegrad Group, and the Benelux. Therefore, the authors approach a comparative analysis of the composition of these regional forums and their areas of cooperation with the Regional Cooperation Council, the Southeast European Cooperation Process, and the Berlin Process. In this regard, the authors state that there are more than obvious similarities between regional cooperation in the Western Balkans, primarily with the Visegrad Group, and to a significant extent with the Benelux. Regional cooperation on the Balkan Peninsula and between the Nordic countries is similar to a lesser extent, owing to the absence of the formation of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Western Balkans, which was overlooked in 2013. The authors conclude that there are numerous obstacles to establishin g more intensive and deeper regional cooperation in the Western Balkans, the most significant of which are the lack of a multilaterally accepted regional identity, the different interests of regional leaders regarding its "originality", the conflicted views of dominant opinions, and the predominant influences of various Western actors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信