衡量支付系统中失败参与者的影响

Ronald Heijmans, Froukelien Wendt
{"title":"衡量支付系统中失败参与者的影响","authors":"Ronald Heijmans, Froukelien Wendt","doi":"10.5089/9781513545080.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Banks and financial market infrastructures (FMIs) that are not able to fulfill their payment\nobligations can be a source of financial instability. This paper develops a composite risk indicator to\nevaluate the criticality of participants in a large value payment system network, combining\nliquidity risk and interconnections in one approach, and applying this to the TARGET2\npayment system. Findings suggest that the most critical participants in TARGET2 are other\npayment systems, because of the size of underlying payment flows. Some banks may be\ncritical, but this is mainly due to their interconnectedness with other TARGET2 participants.\nCentral counterparties and central securities depositories are less critical. These findings can be\nused in financial stability analysis, and feed into central bank policies on payment system access,\noversight, and crisis management.","PeriodicalId":123550,"journal":{"name":"Financial Crises eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the Impact of a Failing Participant in Payment Systems\",\"authors\":\"Ronald Heijmans, Froukelien Wendt\",\"doi\":\"10.5089/9781513545080.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Banks and financial market infrastructures (FMIs) that are not able to fulfill their payment\\nobligations can be a source of financial instability. This paper develops a composite risk indicator to\\nevaluate the criticality of participants in a large value payment system network, combining\\nliquidity risk and interconnections in one approach, and applying this to the TARGET2\\npayment system. Findings suggest that the most critical participants in TARGET2 are other\\npayment systems, because of the size of underlying payment flows. Some banks may be\\ncritical, but this is mainly due to their interconnectedness with other TARGET2 participants.\\nCentral counterparties and central securities depositories are less critical. These findings can be\\nused in financial stability analysis, and feed into central bank policies on payment system access,\\noversight, and crisis management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Crises eJournal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Crises eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513545080.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Crises eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513545080.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

不能履行其支付义务的银行和金融市场基础设施(FMIs)可能是金融不稳定的一个来源。本文提出了一种综合风险指标来评估大金额支付系统网络中参与者的临界性,将流动性风险和互联性结合在一起,并将其应用于target2支付系统。研究结果表明,TARGET2中最关键的参与者是其他支付系统,因为潜在支付流的规模。一些银行可能会提出批评,但这主要是由于它们与TARGET2其他参与者的相互联系。中央对手方和中央证券存管机构则不那么重要。这些发现可以用于金融稳定性分析,并为中央银行关于支付系统访问、监督和危机管理的政策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the Impact of a Failing Participant in Payment Systems
Banks and financial market infrastructures (FMIs) that are not able to fulfill their payment obligations can be a source of financial instability. This paper develops a composite risk indicator to evaluate the criticality of participants in a large value payment system network, combining liquidity risk and interconnections in one approach, and applying this to the TARGET2 payment system. Findings suggest that the most critical participants in TARGET2 are other payment systems, because of the size of underlying payment flows. Some banks may be critical, but this is mainly due to their interconnectedness with other TARGET2 participants. Central counterparties and central securities depositories are less critical. These findings can be used in financial stability analysis, and feed into central bank policies on payment system access, oversight, and crisis management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信