英汉两种语言对形状和材料的影响比较

Xinyu Zeng
{"title":"英汉两种语言对形状和材料的影响比较","authors":"Xinyu Zeng","doi":"10.18178/ijlll.2022.8.2.335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research paper investigates and compares the linguistics influences of shapes and materials between English and Chinese speakers. One previous study compares animate entities, inanimate discrete, and inanimate non-discrete among English, Yucatec Mayan, and Japanese speakers. However, very few previous studies investigate the influences of shapes and materials on Chinese speakers. Therefore, this paper cited the data of A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence Imai and Gentner, about American speakers and collected new data about Chinese speakers, comparing their different responses based on the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis. The results show that Chinese numeral classifiers are more forcibly used when referring to substances than complex and simple object references. English has its influence on those participants who, to some extent, encountered English during their past studies. As users of a language who does not require a numeral classifier adopt unless referring to substances, English speakers are anticipated to focus more on the material when addressing substances. Also, in this research, Chinese speakers have fewer respondents on shapes than American participants. It is a very meaningful study that can imply the linguistics influences of English and Chinese language on speakers’ thoughts.","PeriodicalId":408181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Linguistics Influences of Shapes and Materials between English and Chinese Speakers\",\"authors\":\"Xinyu Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.18178/ijlll.2022.8.2.335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research paper investigates and compares the linguistics influences of shapes and materials between English and Chinese speakers. One previous study compares animate entities, inanimate discrete, and inanimate non-discrete among English, Yucatec Mayan, and Japanese speakers. However, very few previous studies investigate the influences of shapes and materials on Chinese speakers. Therefore, this paper cited the data of A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence Imai and Gentner, about American speakers and collected new data about Chinese speakers, comparing their different responses based on the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis. The results show that Chinese numeral classifiers are more forcibly used when referring to substances than complex and simple object references. English has its influence on those participants who, to some extent, encountered English during their past studies. As users of a language who does not require a numeral classifier adopt unless referring to substances, English speakers are anticipated to focus more on the material when addressing substances. Also, in this research, Chinese speakers have fewer respondents on shapes than American participants. It is a very meaningful study that can imply the linguistics influences of English and Chinese language on speakers’ thoughts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2022.8.2.335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2022.8.2.335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查并比较了英汉两种语言中形状和材料对语言的影响。先前的一项研究比较了英语、尤卡坦玛雅语和日语使用者中有生命的实体、无生命的离散实体和无生命的非离散实体。然而,以往很少有研究探讨形状和材料对汉语使用者的影响。因此,本文引用了Imai和genner关于美国人早期词义的跨语言研究:普遍本体和语言影响的数据,并收集了关于中国人的新数据,比较了他们基于Sapir-Whorf假设的不同反应。结果表明,汉语数词在指称物质时比指称复杂和简单的对象时更强。英语对那些在过去的学习中或多或少接触过英语的参与者产生了影响。作为一门语言的使用者,除非提到物质,否则不需要采用数字分类器,因此预计英语使用者在称呼物质时将更多地关注材料。此外,在这项研究中,中国人对形状的回答比美国人少。这是一项非常有意义的研究,可以揭示英汉语言对说话者思想的语言学影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Linguistics Influences of Shapes and Materials between English and Chinese Speakers
This research paper investigates and compares the linguistics influences of shapes and materials between English and Chinese speakers. One previous study compares animate entities, inanimate discrete, and inanimate non-discrete among English, Yucatec Mayan, and Japanese speakers. However, very few previous studies investigate the influences of shapes and materials on Chinese speakers. Therefore, this paper cited the data of A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence Imai and Gentner, about American speakers and collected new data about Chinese speakers, comparing their different responses based on the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis. The results show that Chinese numeral classifiers are more forcibly used when referring to substances than complex and simple object references. English has its influence on those participants who, to some extent, encountered English during their past studies. As users of a language who does not require a numeral classifier adopt unless referring to substances, English speakers are anticipated to focus more on the material when addressing substances. Also, in this research, Chinese speakers have fewer respondents on shapes than American participants. It is a very meaningful study that can imply the linguistics influences of English and Chinese language on speakers’ thoughts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信