绩效薪酬制度的引入:对法国全科医生的活动有何影响?

B. Dormont, Aimée Kingsada, A. Samson
{"title":"绩效薪酬制度的引入:对法国全科医生的活动有何影响?","authors":"B. Dormont, Aimée Kingsada, A. Samson","doi":"10.24187/ECOSTAT.2021.524D.2045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[eng] In 2009, a system of pay-for-performance (P4P) was offered to physicians in France via the Contrat d’Amelioration des Pratiques Individuelles (CAPI). This study assesses the causal impact of CAPI on their behaviour in terms of care provision. Based on a panel of general practitioners in private practice observed before (2005 and 2008) and after (2011) its introduction, we use an instrumental variables approach, applied to a model in first-differences in order to correct the endogeneity biases linked to the fact that signing up to CAPI is a choice. We show that, unlike other practitioners, those who have signed up to CAPI have not reduced their number of consultations per patient or the amount of prescriptions per patient. They have also increased, to a greater extent than others, the proportion of their patients who they treat as the primary care doctor(i.e. the medecin traitant). Moreover, CAPI has enabled them to increase their fees per patient with, as a consequence, a higher treatment cost for the Social Security system.","PeriodicalId":431625,"journal":{"name":"Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Introduction of Pay-for-Performance: What Impact on General Practitioners' Activity in France?\",\"authors\":\"B. Dormont, Aimée Kingsada, A. Samson\",\"doi\":\"10.24187/ECOSTAT.2021.524D.2045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[eng] In 2009, a system of pay-for-performance (P4P) was offered to physicians in France via the Contrat d’Amelioration des Pratiques Individuelles (CAPI). This study assesses the causal impact of CAPI on their behaviour in terms of care provision. Based on a panel of general practitioners in private practice observed before (2005 and 2008) and after (2011) its introduction, we use an instrumental variables approach, applied to a model in first-differences in order to correct the endogeneity biases linked to the fact that signing up to CAPI is a choice. We show that, unlike other practitioners, those who have signed up to CAPI have not reduced their number of consultations per patient or the amount of prescriptions per patient. They have also increased, to a greater extent than others, the proportion of their patients who they treat as the primary care doctor(i.e. the medecin traitant). Moreover, CAPI has enabled them to increase their fees per patient with, as a consequence, a higher treatment cost for the Social Security system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24187/ECOSTAT.2021.524D.2045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24187/ECOSTAT.2021.524D.2045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2009年,法国通过《个人执业改善合同》(CAPI)向医生提供了绩效薪酬(P4P)制度。本研究评估了CAPI在护理提供方面对其行为的因果影响。基于在CAPI引入之前(2005年和2008年)和之后(2011年)观察到的私人执业全科医生小组,我们使用工具变量方法,应用于第一差异模型,以纠正与签署CAPI是一种选择这一事实相关的内生性偏差。我们表明,与其他从业人员不同,那些签署了CAPI的人并没有减少每位患者的咨询次数或每位患者的处方数量。他们还在更大程度上增加了他们作为初级保健医生治疗的病人的比例。(医生)。此外,CAPI使他们能够提高每个病人的费用,因此,社会保障系统的治疗费用更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Introduction of Pay-for-Performance: What Impact on General Practitioners' Activity in France?
[eng] In 2009, a system of pay-for-performance (P4P) was offered to physicians in France via the Contrat d’Amelioration des Pratiques Individuelles (CAPI). This study assesses the causal impact of CAPI on their behaviour in terms of care provision. Based on a panel of general practitioners in private practice observed before (2005 and 2008) and after (2011) its introduction, we use an instrumental variables approach, applied to a model in first-differences in order to correct the endogeneity biases linked to the fact that signing up to CAPI is a choice. We show that, unlike other practitioners, those who have signed up to CAPI have not reduced their number of consultations per patient or the amount of prescriptions per patient. They have also increased, to a greater extent than others, the proportion of their patients who they treat as the primary care doctor(i.e. the medecin traitant). Moreover, CAPI has enabled them to increase their fees per patient with, as a consequence, a higher treatment cost for the Social Security system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信