一张和多张地图:OpenStreetMap中的参与性和时间多样性

Tyng-Ruey Chuang, D. Deng, Chun-Chen Hsu, R. Lemmens
{"title":"一张和多张地图:OpenStreetMap中的参与性和时间多样性","authors":"Tyng-Ruey Chuang, D. Deng, Chun-Chen Hsu, R. Lemmens","doi":"10.1145/2534732.2534737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OpenStreetMap is an open and collaborative project with thousands of people contributing GPS traces and other data into the making of a global map of places and networks. It is open in the sense that everyone can contribute to the project, and results from the project are free for everyone to reuse. This is contrary to traditional cartography where often a central authority controls the making of the map and its release. Is OpenStreetMap more democratic, and in what sense? Is OpenStreetMap more relevant to the mass, and how can we judge?\n We define and use several metrics to measure temporal properties of defined areas in OpenStreetMap, and to sample modes of participation in these areas. These metrics are used to graph the datasets representing the current OpenStreetMap so as to reveal unevenness in user participation and data temporality. We use the dataset about Taiwan as a test case to observe participatory and temporal diversities among different areas of Taiwan in OpenStreetMap.","PeriodicalId":314116,"journal":{"name":"GEOCROWD '13","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The one and many maps: participatory and temporal diversities in OpenStreetMap\",\"authors\":\"Tyng-Ruey Chuang, D. Deng, Chun-Chen Hsu, R. Lemmens\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2534732.2534737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OpenStreetMap is an open and collaborative project with thousands of people contributing GPS traces and other data into the making of a global map of places and networks. It is open in the sense that everyone can contribute to the project, and results from the project are free for everyone to reuse. This is contrary to traditional cartography where often a central authority controls the making of the map and its release. Is OpenStreetMap more democratic, and in what sense? Is OpenStreetMap more relevant to the mass, and how can we judge?\\n We define and use several metrics to measure temporal properties of defined areas in OpenStreetMap, and to sample modes of participation in these areas. These metrics are used to graph the datasets representing the current OpenStreetMap so as to reveal unevenness in user participation and data temporality. We use the dataset about Taiwan as a test case to observe participatory and temporal diversities among different areas of Taiwan in OpenStreetMap.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GEOCROWD '13\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GEOCROWD '13\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2534732.2534737\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEOCROWD '13","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2534732.2534737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

OpenStreetMap是一个开放和协作的项目,成千上万的人贡献GPS轨迹和其他数据来制作全球地点和网络地图。它是开放的,因为每个人都可以为项目做出贡献,并且每个人都可以免费重用项目的结果。这与传统的地图学相反,传统的地图学通常由一个中央机构控制地图的制作和发布。开放地图更民主吗?在什么意义上?开放地图是否更贴近大众,我们如何判断?我们定义并使用几个指标来测量OpenStreetMap中定义区域的时间属性,并对这些区域的参与模式进行采样。这些指标用于绘制代表当前OpenStreetMap的数据集,从而揭示用户参与和数据时间性的不均匀性。我们以台湾地区的数据集作为测试案例,观察台湾不同地区在OpenStreetMap中的参与性和时间多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The one and many maps: participatory and temporal diversities in OpenStreetMap
OpenStreetMap is an open and collaborative project with thousands of people contributing GPS traces and other data into the making of a global map of places and networks. It is open in the sense that everyone can contribute to the project, and results from the project are free for everyone to reuse. This is contrary to traditional cartography where often a central authority controls the making of the map and its release. Is OpenStreetMap more democratic, and in what sense? Is OpenStreetMap more relevant to the mass, and how can we judge? We define and use several metrics to measure temporal properties of defined areas in OpenStreetMap, and to sample modes of participation in these areas. These metrics are used to graph the datasets representing the current OpenStreetMap so as to reveal unevenness in user participation and data temporality. We use the dataset about Taiwan as a test case to observe participatory and temporal diversities among different areas of Taiwan in OpenStreetMap.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信