双目标版本的团队定向问题(BTOP)

M. Mirzaei, K. Ziarati, Mohammad Naghibi
{"title":"双目标版本的团队定向问题(BTOP)","authors":"M. Mirzaei, K. Ziarati, Mohammad Naghibi","doi":"10.1109/ICCKE.2017.8167930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Team Orienteering Problem (TOP) a set of locations is given, each with a score. The objective is to determine a fixed number of routes (teams), limited in length, that visit some locations and maximize the sum of the collected scores. For the first time we introduce bi-objective TOP which has a second objective, to balance all team's scores for the purpose of obtaining fair teams. So the second objective is minimizing the off-balance in a solution, in other words, Minimizing the difference between highest and lowest score. To solve this problem, we use NSGA-II algorithm with traditional operators and we propose new operators for NSGA-II algorithm to consider the second objective in population production. Finally, we evaluate both algorithms on standard benchmarks of TOP. Because the optimal Pareto set (PFtrue) is unknown for this problem we use two quality indicators, Spacing and Overall Nondominated Vector Generation, which do not need optimal Paerto set for evaluation.","PeriodicalId":151934,"journal":{"name":"2017 7th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bi-objective version of team orienteering problem (BTOP)\",\"authors\":\"M. Mirzaei, K. Ziarati, Mohammad Naghibi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCKE.2017.8167930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the Team Orienteering Problem (TOP) a set of locations is given, each with a score. The objective is to determine a fixed number of routes (teams), limited in length, that visit some locations and maximize the sum of the collected scores. For the first time we introduce bi-objective TOP which has a second objective, to balance all team's scores for the purpose of obtaining fair teams. So the second objective is minimizing the off-balance in a solution, in other words, Minimizing the difference between highest and lowest score. To solve this problem, we use NSGA-II algorithm with traditional operators and we propose new operators for NSGA-II algorithm to consider the second objective in population production. Finally, we evaluate both algorithms on standard benchmarks of TOP. Because the optimal Pareto set (PFtrue) is unknown for this problem we use two quality indicators, Spacing and Overall Nondominated Vector Generation, which do not need optimal Paerto set for evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 7th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 7th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCKE.2017.8167930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 7th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCKE.2017.8167930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在团队定向问题(TOP)中,给出了一组位置,每个位置都有一个分数。目标是确定固定数量的路线(团队),长度有限,访问一些地点并最大化收集分数的总和。我们首次引入了双目标TOP,它有第二个目标,即平衡所有队伍的得分,以获得公平的队伍。第二个目标是最小化解的失衡,换句话说,最小化最高分和最低值之间的差值。为了解决这一问题,我们将NSGA-II算法与传统算子结合使用,并为NSGA-II算法提出了新的算子,以考虑种群产生中的第二个目标。最后,我们在TOP的标准基准上对这两种算法进行了评估。由于该问题的最优帕累托集(PFtrue)是未知的,我们使用两个质量指标,即间距和总体非支配向量生成,它们不需要最优帕累托集进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bi-objective version of team orienteering problem (BTOP)
In the Team Orienteering Problem (TOP) a set of locations is given, each with a score. The objective is to determine a fixed number of routes (teams), limited in length, that visit some locations and maximize the sum of the collected scores. For the first time we introduce bi-objective TOP which has a second objective, to balance all team's scores for the purpose of obtaining fair teams. So the second objective is minimizing the off-balance in a solution, in other words, Minimizing the difference between highest and lowest score. To solve this problem, we use NSGA-II algorithm with traditional operators and we propose new operators for NSGA-II algorithm to consider the second objective in population production. Finally, we evaluate both algorithms on standard benchmarks of TOP. Because the optimal Pareto set (PFtrue) is unknown for this problem we use two quality indicators, Spacing and Overall Nondominated Vector Generation, which do not need optimal Paerto set for evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信