{"title":"重新审视名义统一","authors":"Christian Urban","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.42.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nominal unification calculates substitutions that make terms involving binders equal modulo alpha-equivalence. Although nominal unification can be seen as equivalent to Miller's higher-order pattern unification, it has properties, such as the use of first-order terms with names (as opposed to alpha-equivalence classes) and that no new names need to be generated during unification, which set it clearly apart from higher-order pattern unification. The purpose of this paper is to simplify a clunky proof from the original paper on nominal unification and to give an overview over some results about nominal unification.","PeriodicalId":164988,"journal":{"name":"UNIF","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nominal Unification Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Christian Urban\",\"doi\":\"10.4204/EPTCS.42.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nominal unification calculates substitutions that make terms involving binders equal modulo alpha-equivalence. Although nominal unification can be seen as equivalent to Miller's higher-order pattern unification, it has properties, such as the use of first-order terms with names (as opposed to alpha-equivalence classes) and that no new names need to be generated during unification, which set it clearly apart from higher-order pattern unification. The purpose of this paper is to simplify a clunky proof from the original paper on nominal unification and to give an overview over some results about nominal unification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNIF\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNIF\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.42.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNIF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.42.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nominal unification calculates substitutions that make terms involving binders equal modulo alpha-equivalence. Although nominal unification can be seen as equivalent to Miller's higher-order pattern unification, it has properties, such as the use of first-order terms with names (as opposed to alpha-equivalence classes) and that no new names need to be generated during unification, which set it clearly apart from higher-order pattern unification. The purpose of this paper is to simplify a clunky proof from the original paper on nominal unification and to give an overview over some results about nominal unification.