在线学习中批判性思维能力的发展

M. Nakayama, Satoru Kikuchi, Hiroh Yamamoto
{"title":"在线学习中批判性思维能力的发展","authors":"M. Nakayama, Satoru Kikuchi, Hiroh Yamamoto","doi":"10.1109/IV53921.2021.00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The progress of development of the disposition toward critical thinking in blended and fully online learning environments is compared. Participant’s individual characteristics, including responses to a questionnaire about critical thinking disposition, were measured during a bachelor level university course. Though the measured scores are comparable, the relationships between the scores in the two surveys during the course are different according to learning style. The contributing variables were extracted using linear regression analysis, and the weights assigned to them depended on the style of learning. In particular, variables which contributed to transforming the participant’s ability are discussed. Also, cluster patterns of scores of literacy of science and technology were extracted, and the contributions of the cluster scores was discussed.","PeriodicalId":380260,"journal":{"name":"2021 25th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of critical thinking skills during online learning\",\"authors\":\"M. Nakayama, Satoru Kikuchi, Hiroh Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IV53921.2021.00046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The progress of development of the disposition toward critical thinking in blended and fully online learning environments is compared. Participant’s individual characteristics, including responses to a questionnaire about critical thinking disposition, were measured during a bachelor level university course. Though the measured scores are comparable, the relationships between the scores in the two surveys during the course are different according to learning style. The contributing variables were extracted using linear regression analysis, and the weights assigned to them depended on the style of learning. In particular, variables which contributed to transforming the participant’s ability are discussed. Also, cluster patterns of scores of literacy of science and technology were extracted, and the contributions of the cluster scores was discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 25th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 25th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IV53921.2021.00046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 25th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IV53921.2021.00046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较了混合式和全在线学习环境下批判性思维倾向的发展进展。参与者的个人特征,包括对批判性思维倾向问卷的回答,在本科水平的大学课程中被测量。虽然测量的分数具有可比性,但根据学习风格的不同,在课程中两次调查的分数之间的关系也不同。使用线性回归分析提取贡献变量,并根据学习方式赋予其权重。特别是,变量有助于转化参与者的能力进行了讨论。提取了科学技术素养分数的聚类模式,并讨论了聚类分数的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of critical thinking skills during online learning
The progress of development of the disposition toward critical thinking in blended and fully online learning environments is compared. Participant’s individual characteristics, including responses to a questionnaire about critical thinking disposition, were measured during a bachelor level university course. Though the measured scores are comparable, the relationships between the scores in the two surveys during the course are different according to learning style. The contributing variables were extracted using linear regression analysis, and the weights assigned to them depended on the style of learning. In particular, variables which contributed to transforming the participant’s ability are discussed. Also, cluster patterns of scores of literacy of science and technology were extracted, and the contributions of the cluster scores was discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信