中苏结盟与分裂的经济维度:专刊导论

J. Ẑofka, Tao Chen
{"title":"中苏结盟与分裂的经济维度:专刊导论","authors":"J. Ẑofka, Tao Chen","doi":"10.1080/13507486.2023.2209107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In recent years, the Sino–Soviet Alliance of the 1950s and the subsequent split have received increasing attention in research. Most studies, however, focus on (geo)political questions, with the economic side of alliance and split regarded as an appendix. Thus, this special issue turns to the economic dimensions of the Sino–Soviet Alliance and split. The introduction puts the topics of the special issue into the larger context of global post-war economic expansion and the moving international order. It highlights how the contributions to the special issue show that economic dimensions of East–East interactions are misunderstood if seen only through a narrative of failure or as secondary to Cold War geopolitics. Sino–Soviet exchanges were part of global circulations of knowledge, commodities and resources. The economic residues of the Sino–Soviet Alliance lasted longer than the dozen years before the split. The participation of the Eastern European countries in the technology transfer was considerable, as were the repercussions of these transfers on the Eastern European societies. The different economic bureaucracies’ varying reactions to the Sino–Soviet split are also an important point in the contributions. These actors’ rationales went beyond geopolitics, security and autarky, and did include economic considerations, blurring the clarity of a socialist, Stalinist or Soviet development model.","PeriodicalId":151994,"journal":{"name":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic dimensions of the Sino–Soviet alliance and split: introduction to the special issue\",\"authors\":\"J. Ẑofka, Tao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13507486.2023.2209107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In recent years, the Sino–Soviet Alliance of the 1950s and the subsequent split have received increasing attention in research. Most studies, however, focus on (geo)political questions, with the economic side of alliance and split regarded as an appendix. Thus, this special issue turns to the economic dimensions of the Sino–Soviet Alliance and split. The introduction puts the topics of the special issue into the larger context of global post-war economic expansion and the moving international order. It highlights how the contributions to the special issue show that economic dimensions of East–East interactions are misunderstood if seen only through a narrative of failure or as secondary to Cold War geopolitics. Sino–Soviet exchanges were part of global circulations of knowledge, commodities and resources. The economic residues of the Sino–Soviet Alliance lasted longer than the dozen years before the split. The participation of the Eastern European countries in the technology transfer was considerable, as were the repercussions of these transfers on the Eastern European societies. The different economic bureaucracies’ varying reactions to the Sino–Soviet split are also an important point in the contributions. These actors’ rationales went beyond geopolitics, security and autarky, and did include economic considerations, blurring the clarity of a socialist, Stalinist or Soviet development model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2023.2209107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2023.2209107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:近年来,中苏结盟及其后的分裂越来越受到人们的关注。然而,大多数研究都集中在(地理)政治问题上,而联盟和分裂的经济方面被视为附录。由此,本期特刊转向中苏结盟与分裂的经济维度。引言部分将特刊的主题置于战后全球经济扩张和国际秩序变动的大背景下。它强调了对特刊的贡献如何表明,如果仅仅通过失败的叙述或作为冷战地缘政治的次要因素来看待东西方互动的经济层面,则会被误解。中苏交流是知识、商品和资源全球流通的一部分。中苏联盟的经济残余比分裂前的十几年持续了更长时间。东欧国家对技术转让的参与相当大,这些转让对东欧社会的影响也相当大。不同的经济官僚机构对中苏分裂的不同反应也是贡献的一个重要方面。这些参与者的理由超越了地缘政治、安全和闭关自守,而且确实包括了经济考虑,模糊了社会主义、斯大林主义或苏联发展模式的清晰性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic dimensions of the Sino–Soviet alliance and split: introduction to the special issue
ABSTRACT In recent years, the Sino–Soviet Alliance of the 1950s and the subsequent split have received increasing attention in research. Most studies, however, focus on (geo)political questions, with the economic side of alliance and split regarded as an appendix. Thus, this special issue turns to the economic dimensions of the Sino–Soviet Alliance and split. The introduction puts the topics of the special issue into the larger context of global post-war economic expansion and the moving international order. It highlights how the contributions to the special issue show that economic dimensions of East–East interactions are misunderstood if seen only through a narrative of failure or as secondary to Cold War geopolitics. Sino–Soviet exchanges were part of global circulations of knowledge, commodities and resources. The economic residues of the Sino–Soviet Alliance lasted longer than the dozen years before the split. The participation of the Eastern European countries in the technology transfer was considerable, as were the repercussions of these transfers on the Eastern European societies. The different economic bureaucracies’ varying reactions to the Sino–Soviet split are also an important point in the contributions. These actors’ rationales went beyond geopolitics, security and autarky, and did include economic considerations, blurring the clarity of a socialist, Stalinist or Soviet development model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信