{"title":"消除平权法案:加州退化的教育系统","authors":"Eugene E. García","doi":"10.15779/Z380W86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am the Dean of the Graduate School of Education at the University of California at Berkeley, the top-ranked education school in the nation. Since receiving my doctoral degree from the University of Kansas in 1972, I have served as a Professor of Psychology and/or Education at five public universities, including three in the University of California system. I have also served as Senior Officer and Director of the Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs in the United States Department of Education. I have written extensively on educational policy issues, in particular on multilingualism, multiculturalism, and diversity in education, and on the education of Latinos in the United States. My curriculum vita is attached as Exhibit A.' I have prepared this report on an expedited basis at the request of Scheff & Washington, PC, which represents students who intervened as defendants in Grutter v. Bollinger, 2 a case challenging the affirmative action admissions policies at the University of Michigan Law School. I have not testified as an expert in the last four years and am not being paid for my services in this case. The elimination of affirmative action admissions policies in the University of California system has severely intensified problems of inequality in access to post-secondary and professional education in this state. The number of black, Latino, and Native American students enrolled in the system has dropped, and the system as a whole has begun to segregate into elite campuses with more white and Asian students and less elite campuses with more black and Latina/o students. This circumstance is educationally unacceptable for all: for those of us who teach and who train teachers, for white and Asian students, and for minority students and their communities. It has proven impossible to compensate for the elimination of affirmative action through other means, though attempts to do so have been made. The impact has been particularly destructive in the most competitive graduate and professional schools in the University of California system including my own program and the law schools on the Berkeley and Los Angeles campuses. For decades, the growing emphasis on standardized test scores in postsecondary admissions has compounded the distortions imposed on K-12 education by race-related social and educational inequities. The elimination of affirmative action has made the overemphasis on tests into an even more pernicious guarantee of unequal opportunity for minority students, and especially those students whose primary language is not English. My colleagues and I have called for the elimination","PeriodicalId":408518,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Elimination of Affirmative Action: California's Degraded Educational System\",\"authors\":\"Eugene E. García\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z380W86\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I am the Dean of the Graduate School of Education at the University of California at Berkeley, the top-ranked education school in the nation. Since receiving my doctoral degree from the University of Kansas in 1972, I have served as a Professor of Psychology and/or Education at five public universities, including three in the University of California system. I have also served as Senior Officer and Director of the Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs in the United States Department of Education. I have written extensively on educational policy issues, in particular on multilingualism, multiculturalism, and diversity in education, and on the education of Latinos in the United States. My curriculum vita is attached as Exhibit A.' I have prepared this report on an expedited basis at the request of Scheff & Washington, PC, which represents students who intervened as defendants in Grutter v. Bollinger, 2 a case challenging the affirmative action admissions policies at the University of Michigan Law School. I have not testified as an expert in the last four years and am not being paid for my services in this case. The elimination of affirmative action admissions policies in the University of California system has severely intensified problems of inequality in access to post-secondary and professional education in this state. The number of black, Latino, and Native American students enrolled in the system has dropped, and the system as a whole has begun to segregate into elite campuses with more white and Asian students and less elite campuses with more black and Latina/o students. This circumstance is educationally unacceptable for all: for those of us who teach and who train teachers, for white and Asian students, and for minority students and their communities. It has proven impossible to compensate for the elimination of affirmative action through other means, though attempts to do so have been made. The impact has been particularly destructive in the most competitive graduate and professional schools in the University of California system including my own program and the law schools on the Berkeley and Los Angeles campuses. For decades, the growing emphasis on standardized test scores in postsecondary admissions has compounded the distortions imposed on K-12 education by race-related social and educational inequities. The elimination of affirmative action has made the overemphasis on tests into an even more pernicious guarantee of unequal opportunity for minority students, and especially those students whose primary language is not English. My colleagues and I have called for the elimination\",\"PeriodicalId\":408518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z380W86\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z380W86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我是加州大学伯克利分校教育研究生院的院长,这是全国排名第一的教育学院。自1972年在堪萨斯大学获得博士学位以来,我曾在五所公立大学担任心理学和/或教育学教授,其中包括加州大学系统的三所大学。我还担任过美国教育部双语教育和少数民族语言事务办公室的高级官员和主任。我撰写了大量关于教育政策问题的文章,特别是关于多语言、多元文化和教育多样性的文章,以及关于美国拉丁美洲人的教育的文章。我的个人履历作为附件A。我是应Scheff & Washington, PC的要求,在快速的基础上准备这份报告的。Scheff & Washington, PC代表了作为被告介入Grutter v. Bollinger一案的学生,该案挑战了密歇根大学法学院的平权法案招生政策。在过去的四年里,我没有以专家的身份作证,在这个案子中,我没有得到任何报酬。加州大学系统取消平权录取政策,严重加剧了该州接受高等教育和专业教育的不平等问题。入学的黑人、拉丁裔和美洲原住民学生数量下降,整个系统开始分化为白人和亚裔学生较多的精英校园和黑人和拉丁裔/非裔学生较多的非精英校园。这种情况在教育上是所有人都无法接受的:对我们这些教师和培训教师的人来说,对白人和亚裔学生来说,对少数族裔学生和他们的社区来说。事实证明,通过其他手段弥补平权行动的取消是不可能的,尽管人们曾尝试这样做。这种影响对加州大学系统中竞争最激烈的研究生院和专业学院尤其具有破坏性,包括我自己的项目以及伯克利和洛杉矶校区的法学院。几十年来,高等教育录取中对标准化考试成绩的日益重视,加剧了与种族有关的社会和教育不平等对K-12教育的扭曲。平权行动的取消,使得对考试的过分强调,变成了对少数民族学生,尤其是那些母语不是英语的学生机会不平等的更加有害的保证。我和我的同事们呼吁消除这种疾病
The Elimination of Affirmative Action: California's Degraded Educational System
I am the Dean of the Graduate School of Education at the University of California at Berkeley, the top-ranked education school in the nation. Since receiving my doctoral degree from the University of Kansas in 1972, I have served as a Professor of Psychology and/or Education at five public universities, including three in the University of California system. I have also served as Senior Officer and Director of the Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs in the United States Department of Education. I have written extensively on educational policy issues, in particular on multilingualism, multiculturalism, and diversity in education, and on the education of Latinos in the United States. My curriculum vita is attached as Exhibit A.' I have prepared this report on an expedited basis at the request of Scheff & Washington, PC, which represents students who intervened as defendants in Grutter v. Bollinger, 2 a case challenging the affirmative action admissions policies at the University of Michigan Law School. I have not testified as an expert in the last four years and am not being paid for my services in this case. The elimination of affirmative action admissions policies in the University of California system has severely intensified problems of inequality in access to post-secondary and professional education in this state. The number of black, Latino, and Native American students enrolled in the system has dropped, and the system as a whole has begun to segregate into elite campuses with more white and Asian students and less elite campuses with more black and Latina/o students. This circumstance is educationally unacceptable for all: for those of us who teach and who train teachers, for white and Asian students, and for minority students and their communities. It has proven impossible to compensate for the elimination of affirmative action through other means, though attempts to do so have been made. The impact has been particularly destructive in the most competitive graduate and professional schools in the University of California system including my own program and the law schools on the Berkeley and Los Angeles campuses. For decades, the growing emphasis on standardized test scores in postsecondary admissions has compounded the distortions imposed on K-12 education by race-related social and educational inequities. The elimination of affirmative action has made the overemphasis on tests into an even more pernicious guarantee of unequal opportunity for minority students, and especially those students whose primary language is not English. My colleagues and I have called for the elimination