{"title":"捷克是运动员的避税天堂","authors":"Michal Radvan","doi":"10.15290/OOLSCPREPI.2018.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no specific legal regulation of professional athletes\nin the Czech Republic. In practice, both individual players and\nteam players are mostly self-employment. In case of team\nplayers, compared to the legal regulation in other European\ncountries, it is quite unique. This article deals with the\nlegal regulation of professional team players, especially in\nthe area of taxation. It works with the hypothesis, stated in\ntwo judgments of the Supreme Administrative Court, that team\nplayers should tax their incomes by the personal incomes tax as\nself-employed persons, i.e. businessmen. In 2011, the Supreme\nAdministrative Court stated that team players are not employees\nof their club and they should pay taxes as from independent\nactivities. The Czech Financial Administration followed this\ndecision and taxed these sportsmen as so called independent\nprofessions. The reason why this issue was reopened by the\nSupreme Administrative Court was the case of football player\nDavid Lafata, who got a business license (he became a\nbusinessman) as a footballer and claimed that playing football\nis not an independent profession, but real business. In both\ncases, the personal income tax base is created as the\ndifference between income and expenditure. As mostly there are\nno real high expenditures, Czech legal regulation allows the\nlump sum expenses: in case of independent profession 40 %, but\nfor business (in this very case) 60 %. The aim of the paper is\nto confirm or disprove the hypothesis stated above, analyzing\nexisting legal regulation and case law, and offer solutions de\nlege ferenda.","PeriodicalId":330166,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Czech Tax Heaven for Sportsmen\",\"authors\":\"Michal Radvan\",\"doi\":\"10.15290/OOLSCPREPI.2018.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is no specific legal regulation of professional athletes\\nin the Czech Republic. In practice, both individual players and\\nteam players are mostly self-employment. In case of team\\nplayers, compared to the legal regulation in other European\\ncountries, it is quite unique. This article deals with the\\nlegal regulation of professional team players, especially in\\nthe area of taxation. It works with the hypothesis, stated in\\ntwo judgments of the Supreme Administrative Court, that team\\nplayers should tax their incomes by the personal incomes tax as\\nself-employed persons, i.e. businessmen. In 2011, the Supreme\\nAdministrative Court stated that team players are not employees\\nof their club and they should pay taxes as from independent\\nactivities. The Czech Financial Administration followed this\\ndecision and taxed these sportsmen as so called independent\\nprofessions. The reason why this issue was reopened by the\\nSupreme Administrative Court was the case of football player\\nDavid Lafata, who got a business license (he became a\\nbusinessman) as a footballer and claimed that playing football\\nis not an independent profession, but real business. In both\\ncases, the personal income tax base is created as the\\ndifference between income and expenditure. As mostly there are\\nno real high expenditures, Czech legal regulation allows the\\nlump sum expenses: in case of independent profession 40 %, but\\nfor business (in this very case) 60 %. The aim of the paper is\\nto confirm or disprove the hypothesis stated above, analyzing\\nexisting legal regulation and case law, and offer solutions de\\nlege ferenda.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15290/OOLSCPREPI.2018.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/OOLSCPREPI.2018.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
There is no specific legal regulation of professional athletes
in the Czech Republic. In practice, both individual players and
team players are mostly self-employment. In case of team
players, compared to the legal regulation in other European
countries, it is quite unique. This article deals with the
legal regulation of professional team players, especially in
the area of taxation. It works with the hypothesis, stated in
two judgments of the Supreme Administrative Court, that team
players should tax their incomes by the personal incomes tax as
self-employed persons, i.e. businessmen. In 2011, the Supreme
Administrative Court stated that team players are not employees
of their club and they should pay taxes as from independent
activities. The Czech Financial Administration followed this
decision and taxed these sportsmen as so called independent
professions. The reason why this issue was reopened by the
Supreme Administrative Court was the case of football player
David Lafata, who got a business license (he became a
businessman) as a footballer and claimed that playing football
is not an independent profession, but real business. In both
cases, the personal income tax base is created as the
difference between income and expenditure. As mostly there are
no real high expenditures, Czech legal regulation allows the
lump sum expenses: in case of independent profession 40 %, but
for business (in this very case) 60 %. The aim of the paper is
to confirm or disprove the hypothesis stated above, analyzing
existing legal regulation and case law, and offer solutions de
lege ferenda.