树与树桩神圣森林的象形文字

R. Mcgrath
{"title":"树与树桩神圣森林的象形文字","authors":"R. Mcgrath","doi":"10.2307/4005102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the early romantic period, American artists gradually learned the symbolic language of trees a language they have never since abandoned. The early romantics employed the symbolism of trees to create the text of a national landscape. As both signs in space and icons of the sacred grove, trees located heaven in perspective. Informed over time by the aesthetics of romanticism, realism, and abstraction, the grammar of trees was transformed, but not the symbolism. In time the art of nature and the nature of art conjoined to define the American arboreal lexicon. The first American artists seem to have had difficulty seeing the woods for the trees. Their art, still informed by the classical tradition, could not easily subsume the trackless forest-a \"tangled maze\" beyond village and studio. They occasionally used individual trees as useful and wellbehaved pictorial props-the enframing motifs of picturesque convention but could not seem to transform the intractable wilderness into scenery. For the public the forest was even less manageable. Throughout our early history the forest, both as fact and symbol, was experienced as a material and moral wilderness, a barrier to civilization and virtue. Shocked contemporary European observers saw the central metaphors for American attitudes and behavior toward the fiend-filled forest as warfare and tempest.1 The first stirrings of romanticism on this continent prompted artists to begin seeing the landscape in a different way. For psychological as well as cultural reasons, a new set","PeriodicalId":246151,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest History","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Tree and the Stump: Hieroglyphics of the Sacred Forest\",\"authors\":\"R. Mcgrath\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/4005102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the early romantic period, American artists gradually learned the symbolic language of trees a language they have never since abandoned. The early romantics employed the symbolism of trees to create the text of a national landscape. As both signs in space and icons of the sacred grove, trees located heaven in perspective. Informed over time by the aesthetics of romanticism, realism, and abstraction, the grammar of trees was transformed, but not the symbolism. In time the art of nature and the nature of art conjoined to define the American arboreal lexicon. The first American artists seem to have had difficulty seeing the woods for the trees. Their art, still informed by the classical tradition, could not easily subsume the trackless forest-a \\\"tangled maze\\\" beyond village and studio. They occasionally used individual trees as useful and wellbehaved pictorial props-the enframing motifs of picturesque convention but could not seem to transform the intractable wilderness into scenery. For the public the forest was even less manageable. Throughout our early history the forest, both as fact and symbol, was experienced as a material and moral wilderness, a barrier to civilization and virtue. Shocked contemporary European observers saw the central metaphors for American attitudes and behavior toward the fiend-filled forest as warfare and tempest.1 The first stirrings of romanticism on this continent prompted artists to begin seeing the landscape in a different way. For psychological as well as cultural reasons, a new set\",\"PeriodicalId\":246151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forest History\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forest History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/4005102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4005102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在早期浪漫主义时期,美国艺术家逐渐学会了树的象征语言,一种他们从未放弃的语言。早期浪漫主义者利用树木的象征意义来创造国家风景的文本。作为空间的标志和圣林的象征,树木在透视中位于天堂。随着时间的推移,受到浪漫主义、现实主义和抽象美学的影响,树木的语法发生了变化,但象征意义却没有改变。随着时间的推移,自然的艺术和艺术的本质结合在一起,定义了美国的树木词典。第一批美国艺术家似乎很难只见树木不见森林。他们的艺术仍然受到古典传统的影响,不能轻易地融入没有轨迹的森林——一个超越村庄和工作室的“纠结的迷宫”。他们偶尔会用一棵棵树作为有用的、表现良好的绘画道具——这是风景如画的惯例的框架主题,但似乎无法将难以驾驭的荒野变成风景。对于公众来说,森林更难管理。在我们的早期历史中,森林既是事实又是象征,是物质和道德的荒野,是文明和美德的障碍。震惊的同时代欧洲观察家把美国人对待充满恶魔的森林的态度和行为的中心隐喻看作是战争和暴风雨浪漫主义在这片大陆上的萌芽促使艺术家们开始以不同的方式看待风景。出于心理和文化的原因,一套新的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Tree and the Stump: Hieroglyphics of the Sacred Forest
During the early romantic period, American artists gradually learned the symbolic language of trees a language they have never since abandoned. The early romantics employed the symbolism of trees to create the text of a national landscape. As both signs in space and icons of the sacred grove, trees located heaven in perspective. Informed over time by the aesthetics of romanticism, realism, and abstraction, the grammar of trees was transformed, but not the symbolism. In time the art of nature and the nature of art conjoined to define the American arboreal lexicon. The first American artists seem to have had difficulty seeing the woods for the trees. Their art, still informed by the classical tradition, could not easily subsume the trackless forest-a "tangled maze" beyond village and studio. They occasionally used individual trees as useful and wellbehaved pictorial props-the enframing motifs of picturesque convention but could not seem to transform the intractable wilderness into scenery. For the public the forest was even less manageable. Throughout our early history the forest, both as fact and symbol, was experienced as a material and moral wilderness, a barrier to civilization and virtue. Shocked contemporary European observers saw the central metaphors for American attitudes and behavior toward the fiend-filled forest as warfare and tempest.1 The first stirrings of romanticism on this continent prompted artists to begin seeing the landscape in a different way. For psychological as well as cultural reasons, a new set
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信