自动驾驶汽车的避碰和车辆稳定优先级

J. Funke, Matthew Brown, Stephen M. Erlien, J. C. Gerdes
{"title":"自动驾驶汽车的避碰和车辆稳定优先级","authors":"J. Funke, Matthew Brown, Stephen M. Erlien, J. C. Gerdes","doi":"10.1109/IVS.2015.7225836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One approach to autonomous vehicle control is to generate and then track a desired trajectory without explicit consideration of vehicle stability. Stabilization is then entrusted to the vehicle's built-in production systems, such as electronic stability control, which constantly augment driving inputs to ensure stability. Other approaches explicitly consider stabilization criteria and implement permanently active constraints on the vehicle's actions. Situations exist, however, where enforcing stability constraints could lead to an otherwise avoidable collision. This paper presents an alternative paradigm for autonomous vehicle control that explicitly considers vehicle stability and environmental boundaries as it attempts to track a trajectory; such a mediator can choose to violate short term stability constraints in order to avoid a collision. Model predictive control provides an implementation framework, and an autonomous vehicle demonstrates the viability of the controller as it performs aggressive maneuvers. Driving around a turn at the vehicle's limits exhibits the importance of vehicle stability for autonomous vehicle control. Performing an emergency double lane change, however, highlights a situation where stability criteria must be temporarily violated to avoid a collision.","PeriodicalId":294701,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","volume":"16 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritizing collision avoidance and vehicle stabilization for autonomous vehicles\",\"authors\":\"J. Funke, Matthew Brown, Stephen M. Erlien, J. C. Gerdes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IVS.2015.7225836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One approach to autonomous vehicle control is to generate and then track a desired trajectory without explicit consideration of vehicle stability. Stabilization is then entrusted to the vehicle's built-in production systems, such as electronic stability control, which constantly augment driving inputs to ensure stability. Other approaches explicitly consider stabilization criteria and implement permanently active constraints on the vehicle's actions. Situations exist, however, where enforcing stability constraints could lead to an otherwise avoidable collision. This paper presents an alternative paradigm for autonomous vehicle control that explicitly considers vehicle stability and environmental boundaries as it attempts to track a trajectory; such a mediator can choose to violate short term stability constraints in order to avoid a collision. Model predictive control provides an implementation framework, and an autonomous vehicle demonstrates the viability of the controller as it performs aggressive maneuvers. Driving around a turn at the vehicle's limits exhibits the importance of vehicle stability for autonomous vehicle control. Performing an emergency double lane change, however, highlights a situation where stability criteria must be temporarily violated to avoid a collision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"volume\":\"16 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2015.7225836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2015.7225836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

自动驾驶车辆控制的一种方法是在不明确考虑车辆稳定性的情况下生成并跟踪期望的轨迹。然后,车辆内置的生产系统(如电子稳定控制系统)会不断增加驾驶输入以确保稳定性。其他方法明确考虑稳定标准,并对车辆的行为实施永久主动约束。然而,在某些情况下,实施稳定性约束可能会导致本可避免的碰撞。本文提出了一种自动驾驶汽车控制的替代范例,该范例在试图跟踪轨迹时明确考虑了车辆稳定性和环境边界;这样的调解人可以选择违反短期稳定性约束,以避免碰撞。模型预测控制提供了一个实现框架,自动驾驶汽车在执行激进机动时展示了控制器的可行性。在车辆的极限处进行转弯,显示了车辆稳定性对自动驾驶车辆控制的重要性。然而,执行紧急双变道,突出了必须暂时违反稳定性标准以避免碰撞的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prioritizing collision avoidance and vehicle stabilization for autonomous vehicles
One approach to autonomous vehicle control is to generate and then track a desired trajectory without explicit consideration of vehicle stability. Stabilization is then entrusted to the vehicle's built-in production systems, such as electronic stability control, which constantly augment driving inputs to ensure stability. Other approaches explicitly consider stabilization criteria and implement permanently active constraints on the vehicle's actions. Situations exist, however, where enforcing stability constraints could lead to an otherwise avoidable collision. This paper presents an alternative paradigm for autonomous vehicle control that explicitly considers vehicle stability and environmental boundaries as it attempts to track a trajectory; such a mediator can choose to violate short term stability constraints in order to avoid a collision. Model predictive control provides an implementation framework, and an autonomous vehicle demonstrates the viability of the controller as it performs aggressive maneuvers. Driving around a turn at the vehicle's limits exhibits the importance of vehicle stability for autonomous vehicle control. Performing an emergency double lane change, however, highlights a situation where stability criteria must be temporarily violated to avoid a collision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信