P类pmu的高斯滤波器:不同FIR设计程序的性能比较

Xuansheng Shan, D. Macii, H. Wen, D. Petri
{"title":"P类pmu的高斯滤波器:不同FIR设计程序的性能比较","authors":"Xuansheng Shan, D. Macii, H. Wen, D. Petri","doi":"10.1109/AMPS55790.2022.9978841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protection-oriented (P Class) Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) are required to estimate the synchrophasor, the frequency and the Rate of Change of Frequency (ROCOF) of ac voltage or current waveforms with high accuracy and low latency to detect possible anomalous events in power systems promptly and effectively. The classic architecture of many commercial PMUs relies on the direct frequency Down-Conversion and Filtering (DCF) of the collected input waveform. However, the adopted low-pass filters are generally optimized for harmonic disturbance rejection, while no much attention is usually devoted to overshoot minimization, which is instead of crucial importance when sudden phase or amplitude steps occur. Recalling that in principle the Gaussian filters exhibit zero-overshoot in the case of step changes, in this paper two alternative Finite Impulse Response (FIR) approximations of the Gaussian filter (one based on the windowing method and the other on the cascaded boxcar filters, respectively) are proposed and compared. Several simulation results (obtained in the P Class testing conditions of the IEEE/IEC Standard 60255-118-1:2018) confirm that both filters provide better results than those obtained with the classic triangular impulse response filter suggested in the Annex D of the Standard. Also, the results in the case of step changes exhibit almost zero overshoot and the same response times. However, due to the different frequency response in the stopband, the Gaussian filter approximation based on the cascade of boxcar filters provide slightly more accurate results than in the case when the windowing method is used, even though the latter provides a better approximation of the Gaussian impulse response.","PeriodicalId":253296,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaussian Filters for P Class PMUs: a Performance Comparison of Alternative FIR Design Procedures\",\"authors\":\"Xuansheng Shan, D. Macii, H. Wen, D. Petri\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AMPS55790.2022.9978841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Protection-oriented (P Class) Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) are required to estimate the synchrophasor, the frequency and the Rate of Change of Frequency (ROCOF) of ac voltage or current waveforms with high accuracy and low latency to detect possible anomalous events in power systems promptly and effectively. The classic architecture of many commercial PMUs relies on the direct frequency Down-Conversion and Filtering (DCF) of the collected input waveform. However, the adopted low-pass filters are generally optimized for harmonic disturbance rejection, while no much attention is usually devoted to overshoot minimization, which is instead of crucial importance when sudden phase or amplitude steps occur. Recalling that in principle the Gaussian filters exhibit zero-overshoot in the case of step changes, in this paper two alternative Finite Impulse Response (FIR) approximations of the Gaussian filter (one based on the windowing method and the other on the cascaded boxcar filters, respectively) are proposed and compared. Several simulation results (obtained in the P Class testing conditions of the IEEE/IEC Standard 60255-118-1:2018) confirm that both filters provide better results than those obtained with the classic triangular impulse response filter suggested in the Annex D of the Standard. Also, the results in the case of step changes exhibit almost zero overshoot and the same response times. However, due to the different frequency response in the stopband, the Gaussian filter approximation based on the cascade of boxcar filters provide slightly more accurate results than in the case when the windowing method is used, even though the latter provides a better approximation of the Gaussian impulse response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AMPS55790.2022.9978841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AMPS55790.2022.9978841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面向保护(P类)相量测量单元(PMUs)需要高精度、低延迟地估计交流电压或电流波形的同步相量、频率和频率变化率(ROCOF),以及时有效地检测电力系统中可能出现的异常事件。许多商用pmu的经典架构依赖于采集输入波形的直接频率下变频和滤波(DCF)。然而,所采用的低通滤波器一般都是针对谐波干扰进行优化的,而对超调最小化的关注并不多,而在出现突然的相位或幅度阶跃时,超调最小化就显得不那么重要了。考虑到高斯滤波器在阶跃变化的情况下原则上表现为零超调,本文提出了高斯滤波器的两种有限脉冲响应(FIR)近似(一种基于加窗法,另一种分别基于级联箱车滤波器)并进行了比较。几个仿真结果(在IEEE/IEC标准60255-118-1:2018的P级测试条件下获得)证实,这两种滤波器比标准附件D中建议的经典三角形脉冲响应滤波器提供更好的结果。此外,阶跃变化的结果几乎为零超调,响应时间相同。然而,由于阻带中的频率响应不同,基于箱车滤波器级联的高斯滤波器近似提供的结果比使用加窗方法时稍微准确一些,尽管后者提供了更好的高斯脉冲响应近似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gaussian Filters for P Class PMUs: a Performance Comparison of Alternative FIR Design Procedures
Protection-oriented (P Class) Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) are required to estimate the synchrophasor, the frequency and the Rate of Change of Frequency (ROCOF) of ac voltage or current waveforms with high accuracy and low latency to detect possible anomalous events in power systems promptly and effectively. The classic architecture of many commercial PMUs relies on the direct frequency Down-Conversion and Filtering (DCF) of the collected input waveform. However, the adopted low-pass filters are generally optimized for harmonic disturbance rejection, while no much attention is usually devoted to overshoot minimization, which is instead of crucial importance when sudden phase or amplitude steps occur. Recalling that in principle the Gaussian filters exhibit zero-overshoot in the case of step changes, in this paper two alternative Finite Impulse Response (FIR) approximations of the Gaussian filter (one based on the windowing method and the other on the cascaded boxcar filters, respectively) are proposed and compared. Several simulation results (obtained in the P Class testing conditions of the IEEE/IEC Standard 60255-118-1:2018) confirm that both filters provide better results than those obtained with the classic triangular impulse response filter suggested in the Annex D of the Standard. Also, the results in the case of step changes exhibit almost zero overshoot and the same response times. However, due to the different frequency response in the stopband, the Gaussian filter approximation based on the cascade of boxcar filters provide slightly more accurate results than in the case when the windowing method is used, even though the latter provides a better approximation of the Gaussian impulse response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信