{"title":"教师期望与课堂行为的系统评价","authors":"Ozge Z. Aydin, Ahmet Ok","doi":"10.31704/ijocis.2022.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to scrutinize how teacher expectations are shaped and reflected in teachers’ classroom behaviors by presenting a holistic picture of teacher expectation literature that has significantly developed since 1968. To achieve this, a systematic review design was utilized in the study, and different academic databases, which were namely EBSCOhost, ERIC, Science Direct, Journal Park Academic, and HEC Theses Centre, were examined. Among 1.227 of the studies conducted, 32 research studies were included in the current review based on a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria after the identification, screening, and eligibility processes. After the content analysis carried out on the included studies, the review extracted certain factors shaping teachers’ expectations of students’ academic achievement, which were grouped as students’ readiness, skills and abilities, teacher- and family-related factors, and school policies. In classes, teachers differentiated their instructional methods according to students’ ability levels, presented more group work opportunities, established more eye-contact, assigned cognitively harder tasks, and expected more quality work from high-expectancy students. Teachers also tended to decrease their interaction time by turning to another student when a low-expectancy student could not answer a question, and to know personal or academic strengths of high-expectancy students more than low-expectancy ones.","PeriodicalId":149650,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review on Teacher’s Expectations and Classroom Behaviors\",\"authors\":\"Ozge Z. Aydin, Ahmet Ok\",\"doi\":\"10.31704/ijocis.2022.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the present study was to scrutinize how teacher expectations are shaped and reflected in teachers’ classroom behaviors by presenting a holistic picture of teacher expectation literature that has significantly developed since 1968. To achieve this, a systematic review design was utilized in the study, and different academic databases, which were namely EBSCOhost, ERIC, Science Direct, Journal Park Academic, and HEC Theses Centre, were examined. Among 1.227 of the studies conducted, 32 research studies were included in the current review based on a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria after the identification, screening, and eligibility processes. After the content analysis carried out on the included studies, the review extracted certain factors shaping teachers’ expectations of students’ academic achievement, which were grouped as students’ readiness, skills and abilities, teacher- and family-related factors, and school policies. In classes, teachers differentiated their instructional methods according to students’ ability levels, presented more group work opportunities, established more eye-contact, assigned cognitively harder tasks, and expected more quality work from high-expectancy students. Teachers also tended to decrease their interaction time by turning to another student when a low-expectancy student could not answer a question, and to know personal or academic strengths of high-expectancy students more than low-expectancy ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2022.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2022.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是通过呈现自1968年以来显著发展的教师期望文献的整体图景,仔细检查教师期望是如何形成并反映在教师的课堂行为中。为了实现这一目标,研究采用了系统评价设计,并对EBSCOhost、ERIC、Science Direct、Journal Park academic和HEC thesis Centre等不同的学术数据库进行了检查。在进行的1227项研究中,32项研究在经过识别、筛选和资格程序后,根据一套纳入和排除标准纳入本综述。在对纳入的研究进行内容分析后,本综述提取了影响教师对学生学业成绩期望的某些因素,这些因素分为学生的准备程度、技能和能力、教师和家庭相关因素以及学校政策。在课堂上,教师根据学生的能力水平区分教学方法,提供更多的小组工作机会,建立更多的眼神交流,分配认知难度更高的任务,并期望高期望的学生完成更高质量的作业。当期望低的学生回答不出问题时,教师也倾向于通过转向另一个学生来减少他们的互动时间,并且比期望低的学生更了解期望高的学生的个人或学术优势。
A Systematic Review on Teacher’s Expectations and Classroom Behaviors
The aim of the present study was to scrutinize how teacher expectations are shaped and reflected in teachers’ classroom behaviors by presenting a holistic picture of teacher expectation literature that has significantly developed since 1968. To achieve this, a systematic review design was utilized in the study, and different academic databases, which were namely EBSCOhost, ERIC, Science Direct, Journal Park Academic, and HEC Theses Centre, were examined. Among 1.227 of the studies conducted, 32 research studies were included in the current review based on a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria after the identification, screening, and eligibility processes. After the content analysis carried out on the included studies, the review extracted certain factors shaping teachers’ expectations of students’ academic achievement, which were grouped as students’ readiness, skills and abilities, teacher- and family-related factors, and school policies. In classes, teachers differentiated their instructional methods according to students’ ability levels, presented more group work opportunities, established more eye-contact, assigned cognitively harder tasks, and expected more quality work from high-expectancy students. Teachers also tended to decrease their interaction time by turning to another student when a low-expectancy student could not answer a question, and to know personal or academic strengths of high-expectancy students more than low-expectancy ones.