审慎参与复杂政策

S. Burall
{"title":"审慎参与复杂政策","authors":"S. Burall","doi":"10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781529200980.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elections are important for determining broad political direction, but they cannot by themselves effectively draw out voters’ preferences and interests in order to inform and influence the wide range of policy decisions required for the functioning of a modern economy. Engaging small, representative groups of the public in complex and controversial policy decisions can be one way to build a better understanding of the interests and preferences of the public about specific policy decisions.\nThis chapter explores approaches that have been used across the world, from the Danish Board of Technology’s Consensus Conferences, the Brazilian experiments in Participatory Budgeting, to AmericaSpeaks’ 21st Century Town Hall events, and the UK Government’s Sciencewise programme.\nIt explains why, when run well, such deliberative processes can have a profound impact on policy and its resulting acceptance by the public. However, it also points out they need much wider institutional adoption and increased deliberative capacity and sets out what both national and local government need to do more to address these obstacles.","PeriodicalId":345886,"journal":{"name":"Whose Government is it?","volume":"53 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deliberative Engagement with Complex Policies\",\"authors\":\"S. Burall\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781529200980.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Elections are important for determining broad political direction, but they cannot by themselves effectively draw out voters’ preferences and interests in order to inform and influence the wide range of policy decisions required for the functioning of a modern economy. Engaging small, representative groups of the public in complex and controversial policy decisions can be one way to build a better understanding of the interests and preferences of the public about specific policy decisions.\\nThis chapter explores approaches that have been used across the world, from the Danish Board of Technology’s Consensus Conferences, the Brazilian experiments in Participatory Budgeting, to AmericaSpeaks’ 21st Century Town Hall events, and the UK Government’s Sciencewise programme.\\nIt explains why, when run well, such deliberative processes can have a profound impact on policy and its resulting acceptance by the public. However, it also points out they need much wider institutional adoption and increased deliberative capacity and sets out what both national and local government need to do more to address these obstacles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Whose Government is it?\",\"volume\":\"53 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Whose Government is it?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781529200980.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Whose Government is it?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781529200980.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

选举对于确定广泛的政治方向很重要,但它们本身不能有效地引出选民的偏好和利益,以便为现代经济运作所需的广泛政策决定提供信息和影响。在复杂和有争议的政策决策中,让小规模的、有代表性的公众团体参与进来,可能是更好地了解公众对具体政策决策的利益和偏好的一种方式。本章探讨了世界各地使用的方法,从丹麦技术委员会的共识会议,巴西的参与式预算实验,到AmericaSpeaks的21世纪市政厅活动,以及英国政府的科学明智计划。它解释了为什么如果运作良好,这种审议过程可以对政策及其最终被公众接受产生深远影响。然而,报告也指出,它们需要更广泛的机构采纳和更强的审议能力,并阐明了国家和地方政府需要做些什么来解决这些障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deliberative Engagement with Complex Policies
Elections are important for determining broad political direction, but they cannot by themselves effectively draw out voters’ preferences and interests in order to inform and influence the wide range of policy decisions required for the functioning of a modern economy. Engaging small, representative groups of the public in complex and controversial policy decisions can be one way to build a better understanding of the interests and preferences of the public about specific policy decisions. This chapter explores approaches that have been used across the world, from the Danish Board of Technology’s Consensus Conferences, the Brazilian experiments in Participatory Budgeting, to AmericaSpeaks’ 21st Century Town Hall events, and the UK Government’s Sciencewise programme. It explains why, when run well, such deliberative processes can have a profound impact on policy and its resulting acceptance by the public. However, it also points out they need much wider institutional adoption and increased deliberative capacity and sets out what both national and local government need to do more to address these obstacles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信