跨期人口伦理:关键层面的功利主义原则。

C. Blackorby, W. Bossert, D. Donaldson
{"title":"跨期人口伦理:关键层面的功利主义原则。","authors":"C. Blackorby, W. Bossert, D. Donaldson","doi":"10.2307/2171771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This paper considers the problem of social evaluation in a model where population size, individual lifetime utilities, lengths of life, and birth dates vary across states. In an intertemporal framework, we investigate principles for social evaluation that allow history to matter to some extent. Using an axiom called independence of the utilities of the dead, we provide a characterization of critical-level generalized utilitarian rules. As a by-product of our analysis, we show that social discounting is ruled out in an intertemporal welfarist environment. A simple population-planning example is also discussed.\"","PeriodicalId":320174,"journal":{"name":"Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society","volume":"63 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"151","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intertemporal population ethics: critical-level utilitarian principles.\",\"authors\":\"C. Blackorby, W. Bossert, D. Donaldson\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2171771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"This paper considers the problem of social evaluation in a model where population size, individual lifetime utilities, lengths of life, and birth dates vary across states. In an intertemporal framework, we investigate principles for social evaluation that allow history to matter to some extent. Using an axiom called independence of the utilities of the dead, we provide a characterization of critical-level generalized utilitarian rules. As a by-product of our analysis, we show that social discounting is ruled out in an intertemporal welfarist environment. A simple population-planning example is also discussed.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":320174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society\",\"volume\":\"63 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"151\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2171771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2171771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 151

摘要

“本文考虑了一个模型中的社会评估问题,在这个模型中,人口规模、个人终身效用、寿命长度和出生日期因州而异。在跨期框架中,我们研究了允许历史在一定程度上起作用的社会评价原则。利用一个被称为死者效用独立性的公理,我们提供了临界水平广义功利规则的表征。作为我们分析的副产品,我们表明社会折扣在跨期福利主义环境中被排除在外。文中还讨论了一个简单的人口规划实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intertemporal population ethics: critical-level utilitarian principles.
"This paper considers the problem of social evaluation in a model where population size, individual lifetime utilities, lengths of life, and birth dates vary across states. In an intertemporal framework, we investigate principles for social evaluation that allow history to matter to some extent. Using an axiom called independence of the utilities of the dead, we provide a characterization of critical-level generalized utilitarian rules. As a by-product of our analysis, we show that social discounting is ruled out in an intertemporal welfarist environment. A simple population-planning example is also discussed."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信