硫磺、石膏和堆肥添加及耕作方式对盐碱地土壤性质和小麦生产力的影响

M. Esmaeil
{"title":"硫磺、石膏和堆肥添加及耕作方式对盐碱地土壤性质和小麦生产力的影响","authors":"M. Esmaeil","doi":"10.21608/mjss.2018.123631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective use of salt affected soils needs the development of the most efficient and suitable reclamation technology to optimize farm management and better crop yields. Different chemical methods and amendments are used to reclaim the salt affected soils, and after reclamation such soils may be used for sustainable agricultural production. Choice of a chemical amendment depends on its availability, cost, handling and time of application. A field experiment was conducted for two successive winter seasons 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 at Sahl El-Hossinia Agric. Res. Station, El-Sharkia Governorate, Egypt, to evaluate two tillage methods (surface and subsurface) and three soil amendments (elemental sulphur \"S\", gypsum \"Gy\", compost \"Co\", compost + sulphur, compost + gypsum, gypsum + sulphur and compost + sulphur + gypsum) on some soil properties and wheat yield. The studied treatments were arranged within the experimental units in a split plot design in three replicates. Statistical analysis of grains and straw yield data showed that all the added amendments significantly increased the grains and straw yield of wheat compared with control. The addition of Gy+Co+S was the most effective addition in increasing the grains and straw yield in surface and subsurface tillage. Also, it is clear that grains and straw yields of wheat in the treatments of subsurface tillage were slightly higher than those in the treatments of surface tillage. Data showed that all applications of soil amendments under different tillage methods decreased soil pH and EC, but there is an increase in the values of organic matter and cation exchange capacity. This effect is more obvious in case of applying Gy+Co+S. Subsurface tillage associated by high values of O.M (%) and CEC (c.mole) than surface tillage. Soil OM (%) and CEC (c.mol/kg) were significantly increased as a result of added amendments. Data showed that values of total dry stable aggregates (DSA) and water stable aggregates (WSA) were increased in all treatments under study compared to control. The highest increase in values of total stable aggregates (DSA and WSA) was observed in the treatment of Gy+Co+S with subsurface tillage method compared to the treatments of surface tillage method and control. The highest values of hydraulic conductivity, total porosity, field capacity and available water were found by applying Gy+Co+S treatment in subsurface tillage method compared to control and other treatments of surface and subsurface tillage. The values of soil bulk density at different soil depths of all treatments were relatively low and the maximum decrease exists in case of the treatment Gy+Co+S with subsurface tillage method compared to other treatments and control. Generally, it can be concluded that gypsum, sulphur and compost application had decreased the hazardous effect of salinity of soil and hence exerted favorable effects on growth and yield of wheat. Subsurface tillage method improved soil chemical and physical properties which are reflected on growth and grain yield of wheat compared with the surface tillage method.","PeriodicalId":355116,"journal":{"name":"Menoufia Journal of Soil Science","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECT OF SULPHUR, GYPSUM AND COMPOST ADDITION AND TILLAGE METHODS ON SOIL PROPERTIES AND WHEAT PRODUCTIVITY IN SALINE SOIL\",\"authors\":\"M. Esmaeil\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/mjss.2018.123631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Effective use of salt affected soils needs the development of the most efficient and suitable reclamation technology to optimize farm management and better crop yields. Different chemical methods and amendments are used to reclaim the salt affected soils, and after reclamation such soils may be used for sustainable agricultural production. Choice of a chemical amendment depends on its availability, cost, handling and time of application. A field experiment was conducted for two successive winter seasons 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 at Sahl El-Hossinia Agric. Res. Station, El-Sharkia Governorate, Egypt, to evaluate two tillage methods (surface and subsurface) and three soil amendments (elemental sulphur \\\"S\\\", gypsum \\\"Gy\\\", compost \\\"Co\\\", compost + sulphur, compost + gypsum, gypsum + sulphur and compost + sulphur + gypsum) on some soil properties and wheat yield. The studied treatments were arranged within the experimental units in a split plot design in three replicates. Statistical analysis of grains and straw yield data showed that all the added amendments significantly increased the grains and straw yield of wheat compared with control. The addition of Gy+Co+S was the most effective addition in increasing the grains and straw yield in surface and subsurface tillage. Also, it is clear that grains and straw yields of wheat in the treatments of subsurface tillage were slightly higher than those in the treatments of surface tillage. Data showed that all applications of soil amendments under different tillage methods decreased soil pH and EC, but there is an increase in the values of organic matter and cation exchange capacity. This effect is more obvious in case of applying Gy+Co+S. Subsurface tillage associated by high values of O.M (%) and CEC (c.mole) than surface tillage. Soil OM (%) and CEC (c.mol/kg) were significantly increased as a result of added amendments. Data showed that values of total dry stable aggregates (DSA) and water stable aggregates (WSA) were increased in all treatments under study compared to control. The highest increase in values of total stable aggregates (DSA and WSA) was observed in the treatment of Gy+Co+S with subsurface tillage method compared to the treatments of surface tillage method and control. The highest values of hydraulic conductivity, total porosity, field capacity and available water were found by applying Gy+Co+S treatment in subsurface tillage method compared to control and other treatments of surface and subsurface tillage. The values of soil bulk density at different soil depths of all treatments were relatively low and the maximum decrease exists in case of the treatment Gy+Co+S with subsurface tillage method compared to other treatments and control. Generally, it can be concluded that gypsum, sulphur and compost application had decreased the hazardous effect of salinity of soil and hence exerted favorable effects on growth and yield of wheat. Subsurface tillage method improved soil chemical and physical properties which are reflected on growth and grain yield of wheat compared with the surface tillage method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Menoufia Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Menoufia Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjss.2018.123631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menoufia Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjss.2018.123631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有效利用受盐影响的土壤需要开发最有效和最合适的复垦技术,以优化农场管理和提高作物产量。利用不同的化学方法和改良剂对受盐影响的土壤进行复垦,复垦后的土壤可用于可持续农业生产。化学改良剂的选择取决于它的可用性、成本、处理方法和使用时间。在2014/2015年和2015/2016年连续两个冬季,在Sahl El-Hossinia Agric进行了田间试验。埃及El-Sharkia省Res. Station,评估两种耕作方法(地表和地下)和三种土壤改良剂(单质硫“S”、石膏“Gy”、堆肥“Co”、堆肥+硫、堆肥+石膏、石膏+硫和堆肥+硫+石膏)对一些土壤特性和小麦产量的影响。所研究的处理按3个重复的分割区设计安排在试验单元内。对籽粒和秸秆产量数据的统计分析表明,与对照相比,所有添加的改良剂均显著提高了小麦的籽粒和秸秆产量。在地表和地下耕作中,添加Gy+Co+S对提高籽粒和秸秆产量最有效。地下耕作处理小麦籽粒和秸秆产量明显高于地表耕作处理。结果表明,不同耕作方式下施用土壤改良剂均能降低土壤pH值和EC值,但有机质值和阳离子交换量均有增加。这种效应在应用Gy+Co+S时更为明显。与地表耕作相比,地下耕作的O.M(%)和CEC (c.mol)值更高。土壤OM(%)和CEC (c.mol/kg)显著增加。数据表明,与对照相比,各处理的干稳定团聚体(DSA)和水稳定团聚体(WSA)均有所增加。土壤总稳定团聚体(DSA和WSA)在Gy+Co+S地下耕作方式下的增加幅度最大,高于地表耕作方式和对照。与对照及其他地表和地下耕作处理相比,地下耕作方式中施用Gy+Co+S处理的水导率、总孔隙度、田间容量和有效水分最高。各处理不同土层深度的土壤容重值均较低,其中Gy+Co+S潜耕处理与其他处理和对照相比降幅最大。综上所述,石膏、硫和堆肥的施用降低了土壤盐分的危害效应,对小麦的生长和产量产生了有利的影响。与地表耕作相比,地下耕作改善了土壤的化学和物理性质,这些性质反映在小麦的生长和产量上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFECT OF SULPHUR, GYPSUM AND COMPOST ADDITION AND TILLAGE METHODS ON SOIL PROPERTIES AND WHEAT PRODUCTIVITY IN SALINE SOIL
Effective use of salt affected soils needs the development of the most efficient and suitable reclamation technology to optimize farm management and better crop yields. Different chemical methods and amendments are used to reclaim the salt affected soils, and after reclamation such soils may be used for sustainable agricultural production. Choice of a chemical amendment depends on its availability, cost, handling and time of application. A field experiment was conducted for two successive winter seasons 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 at Sahl El-Hossinia Agric. Res. Station, El-Sharkia Governorate, Egypt, to evaluate two tillage methods (surface and subsurface) and three soil amendments (elemental sulphur "S", gypsum "Gy", compost "Co", compost + sulphur, compost + gypsum, gypsum + sulphur and compost + sulphur + gypsum) on some soil properties and wheat yield. The studied treatments were arranged within the experimental units in a split plot design in three replicates. Statistical analysis of grains and straw yield data showed that all the added amendments significantly increased the grains and straw yield of wheat compared with control. The addition of Gy+Co+S was the most effective addition in increasing the grains and straw yield in surface and subsurface tillage. Also, it is clear that grains and straw yields of wheat in the treatments of subsurface tillage were slightly higher than those in the treatments of surface tillage. Data showed that all applications of soil amendments under different tillage methods decreased soil pH and EC, but there is an increase in the values of organic matter and cation exchange capacity. This effect is more obvious in case of applying Gy+Co+S. Subsurface tillage associated by high values of O.M (%) and CEC (c.mole) than surface tillage. Soil OM (%) and CEC (c.mol/kg) were significantly increased as a result of added amendments. Data showed that values of total dry stable aggregates (DSA) and water stable aggregates (WSA) were increased in all treatments under study compared to control. The highest increase in values of total stable aggregates (DSA and WSA) was observed in the treatment of Gy+Co+S with subsurface tillage method compared to the treatments of surface tillage method and control. The highest values of hydraulic conductivity, total porosity, field capacity and available water were found by applying Gy+Co+S treatment in subsurface tillage method compared to control and other treatments of surface and subsurface tillage. The values of soil bulk density at different soil depths of all treatments were relatively low and the maximum decrease exists in case of the treatment Gy+Co+S with subsurface tillage method compared to other treatments and control. Generally, it can be concluded that gypsum, sulphur and compost application had decreased the hazardous effect of salinity of soil and hence exerted favorable effects on growth and yield of wheat. Subsurface tillage method improved soil chemical and physical properties which are reflected on growth and grain yield of wheat compared with the surface tillage method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信