{"title":"各种迟滞模型与实验数据的比较","authors":"F. Ossart, G. Meunier","doi":"10.1063/1.344585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a comparison between results predicted by two mathematical models of magnetic hysteresis and experimental data. The first model is based on the Preisach model, the second consists in solving a differential equation between B and H. Those models are very different in their principles and the properties they exhibit. In particular, the second one models the accommodation of minor loops and the anhysteresis curve when the first does not. The magnetic material we study is a CoNiCr alloy for longitudinal digital recording. We give some results showing that, for this material, the Mayergoyz model fits better the experimental behavior.","PeriodicalId":289239,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Magnetics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between various hysteresis models and experimetnal data\",\"authors\":\"F. Ossart, G. Meunier\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/1.344585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a comparison between results predicted by two mathematical models of magnetic hysteresis and experimental data. The first model is based on the Preisach model, the second consists in solving a differential equation between B and H. Those models are very different in their principles and the properties they exhibit. In particular, the second one models the accommodation of minor loops and the anhysteresis curve when the first does not. The magnetic material we study is a CoNiCr alloy for longitudinal digital recording. We give some results showing that, for this material, the Mayergoyz model fits better the experimental behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Magnetics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Magnetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.344585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Magnetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.344585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison between various hysteresis models and experimetnal data
We propose a comparison between results predicted by two mathematical models of magnetic hysteresis and experimental data. The first model is based on the Preisach model, the second consists in solving a differential equation between B and H. Those models are very different in their principles and the properties they exhibit. In particular, the second one models the accommodation of minor loops and the anhysteresis curve when the first does not. The magnetic material we study is a CoNiCr alloy for longitudinal digital recording. We give some results showing that, for this material, the Mayergoyz model fits better the experimental behavior.