各种迟滞模型与实验数据的比较

F. Ossart, G. Meunier
{"title":"各种迟滞模型与实验数据的比较","authors":"F. Ossart, G. Meunier","doi":"10.1063/1.344585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a comparison between results predicted by two mathematical models of magnetic hysteresis and experimental data. The first model is based on the Preisach model, the second consists in solving a differential equation between B and H. Those models are very different in their principles and the properties they exhibit. In particular, the second one models the accommodation of minor loops and the anhysteresis curve when the first does not. The magnetic material we study is a CoNiCr alloy for longitudinal digital recording. We give some results showing that, for this material, the Mayergoyz model fits better the experimental behavior.","PeriodicalId":289239,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Magnetics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between various hysteresis models and experimetnal data\",\"authors\":\"F. Ossart, G. Meunier\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/1.344585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a comparison between results predicted by two mathematical models of magnetic hysteresis and experimental data. The first model is based on the Preisach model, the second consists in solving a differential equation between B and H. Those models are very different in their principles and the properties they exhibit. In particular, the second one models the accommodation of minor loops and the anhysteresis curve when the first does not. The magnetic material we study is a CoNiCr alloy for longitudinal digital recording. We give some results showing that, for this material, the Mayergoyz model fits better the experimental behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Magnetics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Magnetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.344585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Magnetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.344585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文将两种磁滞数学模型的预测结果与实验数据进行了比较。第一个模型是基于Preisach模型,第二个是解决B和h之间的微分方程。这两个模型在原理和表现出的性质上有很大的不同。特别是,当第一个模型不适应时,第二个模型模拟了小回路和非滞后曲线的调节。我们研究的磁性材料是用于纵向数字记录的CoNiCr合金。我们给出的一些结果表明,对于这种材料,Mayergoyz模型更符合实验行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between various hysteresis models and experimetnal data
We propose a comparison between results predicted by two mathematical models of magnetic hysteresis and experimental data. The first model is based on the Preisach model, the second consists in solving a differential equation between B and H. Those models are very different in their principles and the properties they exhibit. In particular, the second one models the accommodation of minor loops and the anhysteresis curve when the first does not. The magnetic material we study is a CoNiCr alloy for longitudinal digital recording. We give some results showing that, for this material, the Mayergoyz model fits better the experimental behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信