噪声交易者在NSE和BSE市场的风险动态。

Dr. Paritosh Chandra Sinha
{"title":"噪声交易者在NSE和BSE市场的风险动态。","authors":"Dr. Paritosh Chandra Sinha","doi":"10.21863/IJFM/2015.5.4.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the literature of Financial Economics, the connotation “noise” and “noise traders” play critical roles in stocks’ equilibrium pricing mechanism. The equilibrium prices, however, include economic and non-economic aspects. In an empirical exploration, the paper seeks to explore the nature and magnitude of the noise traders’ risk in the Indian markets specifically during its present recovery phase. Besides the daily trading data for “open”, “high”, “low”, and “close” prices, and corresponding trading volumes, the study utilizes the intra-day 1D (one minute) and also 5D (five minutes) trade-prices, trade-volumes, and trade-times data of the sample firms (mostly the Nifty-Fifty firms) listed both in the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). The study utilizes the NSE-Nifty and the BSE-Sensex indices for the market return data. The study examines two important critical facets in Behavioral Finance – (i) whether stocks’ total return variations incorporate noise traders’ risk or not, that is, whether noise is priced in the stock markets’ equilibrium pricing mechanism or not, and (ii) whether informed traders’ short-run risky arbitrage positioning forces them to long-short positioning for possible hedging opportunities or not. The study methodologically argues that the noise as opposed to information has both systematic and firm-specific components and it varies over time while each component includes fundamental (that is, idiosyncratic) and noise aspects. At some days’ lag-periods, long-short position by traders over the two stock markets can hedge the fundamental systematic and the fundamental firm-specific shocks and may detach the noise shocks. Once stocks are traded at long or short horizons in the markets, traders’ long-short returns expose noise aspects across stocks in the markets. On the context of current recovering markets, the study explores comparisons of the results with the current price-volume-trade time data with those of two years earlier. The findings suggest that the intra-day returns (derived from 1D and 5D data) impound a significant level of noise while the daily return (weekly) returns have high (moderate) exposures to noise. The findings of conditional volatilities of long-short returns from the GARCH models show that the estimate of time-varying idiosyncratic noise is highly persistent at presence of noise traders in the equilibrium pricing mechanism. The study concludes that stocks’ prices impound information as well as noise in the market places during the four distinct trading days.","PeriodicalId":287077,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamics of Noise Traders’ Risk in the NSE and BSE Markets.\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Paritosh Chandra Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.21863/IJFM/2015.5.4.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the literature of Financial Economics, the connotation “noise” and “noise traders” play critical roles in stocks’ equilibrium pricing mechanism. The equilibrium prices, however, include economic and non-economic aspects. In an empirical exploration, the paper seeks to explore the nature and magnitude of the noise traders’ risk in the Indian markets specifically during its present recovery phase. Besides the daily trading data for “open”, “high”, “low”, and “close” prices, and corresponding trading volumes, the study utilizes the intra-day 1D (one minute) and also 5D (five minutes) trade-prices, trade-volumes, and trade-times data of the sample firms (mostly the Nifty-Fifty firms) listed both in the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). The study utilizes the NSE-Nifty and the BSE-Sensex indices for the market return data. The study examines two important critical facets in Behavioral Finance – (i) whether stocks’ total return variations incorporate noise traders’ risk or not, that is, whether noise is priced in the stock markets’ equilibrium pricing mechanism or not, and (ii) whether informed traders’ short-run risky arbitrage positioning forces them to long-short positioning for possible hedging opportunities or not. The study methodologically argues that the noise as opposed to information has both systematic and firm-specific components and it varies over time while each component includes fundamental (that is, idiosyncratic) and noise aspects. At some days’ lag-periods, long-short position by traders over the two stock markets can hedge the fundamental systematic and the fundamental firm-specific shocks and may detach the noise shocks. Once stocks are traded at long or short horizons in the markets, traders’ long-short returns expose noise aspects across stocks in the markets. On the context of current recovering markets, the study explores comparisons of the results with the current price-volume-trade time data with those of two years earlier. The findings suggest that the intra-day returns (derived from 1D and 5D data) impound a significant level of noise while the daily return (weekly) returns have high (moderate) exposures to noise. The findings of conditional volatilities of long-short returns from the GARCH models show that the estimate of time-varying idiosyncratic noise is highly persistent at presence of noise traders in the equilibrium pricing mechanism. The study concludes that stocks’ prices impound information as well as noise in the market places during the four distinct trading days.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21863/IJFM/2015.5.4.021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Asia & Pacific (Emerging Markets) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21863/IJFM/2015.5.4.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在金融经济学文献中,“噪声”和“噪声交易者”的内涵在股票均衡定价机制中起着至关重要的作用。然而,均衡价格包括经济和非经济两个方面。在实证探索中,本文试图探索噪音交易者在印度市场风险的性质和程度,特别是在目前的复苏阶段。除了“开盘价”、“高点”、“低点”和“收盘价”的每日交易数据以及相应的交易量外,本研究还利用了在国家证券交易所(NSE)和孟买证券交易所(BSE)上市的样本公司(主要是nfifty - fifty公司)的日内1D(一分钟)和5D(五分钟)交易价格、交易量和交易时间数据。本研究采用NSE-Nifty指数和BSE-Sensex指数作为市场回报数据。本研究考察了行为金融学中两个重要的关键方面——(i)股票的总收益变化是否包含噪声交易者的风险,即噪声是否在股票市场的均衡定价机制中定价;(ii)知情交易者的短期风险套利定位是否迫使他们进行多空定位,以获得可能的对冲机会。该研究在方法论上认为,与信息相反,噪音既有系统成分,也有公司特定成分,并且随着时间的推移而变化,而每个成分都包括基本(即特质)和噪音方面。在某些交易日的滞后期,交易者在两个股票市场上的多空头寸可以对冲基本的系统性冲击和基本的公司特异性冲击,并可能分离噪声冲击。一旦股票在市场上进行长期或短期交易,交易员的多空回报就会暴露出市场上所有股票的噪音因素。在当前市场复苏的背景下,该研究将结果与当前价格-数量-交易时间数据与两年前的数据进行了比较。研究结果表明,日内收益(来自1D和5D数据)包含显著水平的噪声,而日收益(每周)收益具有高(中等)的噪声暴露。GARCH模型对多空收益条件波动的研究结果表明,当均衡定价机制中存在噪声交易者时,时变特质噪声的估计具有高度的持久性。该研究的结论是,股票价格在四个不同的交易日中包含了市场上的信息和噪音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamics of Noise Traders’ Risk in the NSE and BSE Markets.
In the literature of Financial Economics, the connotation “noise” and “noise traders” play critical roles in stocks’ equilibrium pricing mechanism. The equilibrium prices, however, include economic and non-economic aspects. In an empirical exploration, the paper seeks to explore the nature and magnitude of the noise traders’ risk in the Indian markets specifically during its present recovery phase. Besides the daily trading data for “open”, “high”, “low”, and “close” prices, and corresponding trading volumes, the study utilizes the intra-day 1D (one minute) and also 5D (five minutes) trade-prices, trade-volumes, and trade-times data of the sample firms (mostly the Nifty-Fifty firms) listed both in the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). The study utilizes the NSE-Nifty and the BSE-Sensex indices for the market return data. The study examines two important critical facets in Behavioral Finance – (i) whether stocks’ total return variations incorporate noise traders’ risk or not, that is, whether noise is priced in the stock markets’ equilibrium pricing mechanism or not, and (ii) whether informed traders’ short-run risky arbitrage positioning forces them to long-short positioning for possible hedging opportunities or not. The study methodologically argues that the noise as opposed to information has both systematic and firm-specific components and it varies over time while each component includes fundamental (that is, idiosyncratic) and noise aspects. At some days’ lag-periods, long-short position by traders over the two stock markets can hedge the fundamental systematic and the fundamental firm-specific shocks and may detach the noise shocks. Once stocks are traded at long or short horizons in the markets, traders’ long-short returns expose noise aspects across stocks in the markets. On the context of current recovering markets, the study explores comparisons of the results with the current price-volume-trade time data with those of two years earlier. The findings suggest that the intra-day returns (derived from 1D and 5D data) impound a significant level of noise while the daily return (weekly) returns have high (moderate) exposures to noise. The findings of conditional volatilities of long-short returns from the GARCH models show that the estimate of time-varying idiosyncratic noise is highly persistent at presence of noise traders in the equilibrium pricing mechanism. The study concludes that stocks’ prices impound information as well as noise in the market places during the four distinct trading days.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信