Covid-19疫苗接种话语:歧视与抗议运动

Gurevich Lyubov
{"title":"Covid-19疫苗接种话语:歧视与抗议运动","authors":"Gurevich Lyubov","doi":"10.33422/3rd.socialsciencesconf.2021.10.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The problem, dealing with Covid-19 vaccination campaign, has become extremely urgent recently. It has spontaneously launched a severe emotion-charged societal response in the world community. The society has split into two oppositional categories according to vaccination status principle. This article is aimed at providing of an in-depth look at three types of discourse (medical experts’, political and social media discourse), in order to figure out the essence of a new unprecedented type of discrimination which hasn’t been registered in the society before the Covid-19 pandemic. The analysis of social discourse rhetoric on the matter of vaccination offers a clue to understanding of the reasons of protesting movements as a result of societal response to discriminatory governmental actions, such as mandating of vaccination for certain categories of people, imposition of limitations for unvaccinated people, fees and even imprisonment, which amounted to human rights violation. Theoretically, vaccination status discrimination has proved to be a specific social phenomenon characterized by a unique set of features, which is extrinsic to a stereotyped mode of discrimination, reported in sociolinguistic research.","PeriodicalId":324930,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 3rd World Conference on Research in Social Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covid-19 Vaccination Discourse: Discrimination VS Protesting Movement\",\"authors\":\"Gurevich Lyubov\",\"doi\":\"10.33422/3rd.socialsciencesconf.2021.10.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". The problem, dealing with Covid-19 vaccination campaign, has become extremely urgent recently. It has spontaneously launched a severe emotion-charged societal response in the world community. The society has split into two oppositional categories according to vaccination status principle. This article is aimed at providing of an in-depth look at three types of discourse (medical experts’, political and social media discourse), in order to figure out the essence of a new unprecedented type of discrimination which hasn’t been registered in the society before the Covid-19 pandemic. The analysis of social discourse rhetoric on the matter of vaccination offers a clue to understanding of the reasons of protesting movements as a result of societal response to discriminatory governmental actions, such as mandating of vaccination for certain categories of people, imposition of limitations for unvaccinated people, fees and even imprisonment, which amounted to human rights violation. Theoretically, vaccination status discrimination has proved to be a specific social phenomenon characterized by a unique set of features, which is extrinsic to a stereotyped mode of discrimination, reported in sociolinguistic research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of The 3rd World Conference on Research in Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of The 3rd World Conference on Research in Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.socialsciencesconf.2021.10.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 3rd World Conference on Research in Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.socialsciencesconf.2021.10.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 处理Covid-19疫苗接种运动的问题最近变得极其紧迫。它在国际社会中自发地引发了一场激烈的、充满感情的社会反应。根据疫苗接种地位原则,社会分裂为两个对立的类别。本文旨在对医学专家话语、政治话语和社交媒体话语这三种类型的话语进行深入分析,以找出新冠肺炎大流行之前社会上从未出现过的一种新的前所未有的歧视的本质。对关于疫苗接种问题的社会话语修辞的分析提供了一条线索,有助于理解抗议运动的原因,这是社会对歧视性政府行为的反应,例如对某些类别的人强制接种疫苗,对未接种疫苗的人施加限制,收费甚至监禁,这些行为构成侵犯人权。从理论上讲,疫苗接种身份歧视已被证明是一种特定的社会现象,具有一系列独特的特征,这是社会语言学研究中报告的刻板歧视模式的外在特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Covid-19 Vaccination Discourse: Discrimination VS Protesting Movement
. The problem, dealing with Covid-19 vaccination campaign, has become extremely urgent recently. It has spontaneously launched a severe emotion-charged societal response in the world community. The society has split into two oppositional categories according to vaccination status principle. This article is aimed at providing of an in-depth look at three types of discourse (medical experts’, political and social media discourse), in order to figure out the essence of a new unprecedented type of discrimination which hasn’t been registered in the society before the Covid-19 pandemic. The analysis of social discourse rhetoric on the matter of vaccination offers a clue to understanding of the reasons of protesting movements as a result of societal response to discriminatory governmental actions, such as mandating of vaccination for certain categories of people, imposition of limitations for unvaccinated people, fees and even imprisonment, which amounted to human rights violation. Theoretically, vaccination status discrimination has proved to be a specific social phenomenon characterized by a unique set of features, which is extrinsic to a stereotyped mode of discrimination, reported in sociolinguistic research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信