尼日利亚法律中浮动抵押权的性质与效力辨析

E. Emudainohwo
{"title":"尼日利亚法律中浮动抵押权的性质与效力辨析","authors":"E. Emudainohwo","doi":"10.4236/BLR.2021.121011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to examine the character and efficacy of a floating charge as a security in Nigerian law. It argues that the disadvantages of a floating charge are so much making it a vulnerable security. The charge holder runs the risk of the company dissipating the assets attached to the charge which arguably is the most serious risk the charge holder faces. Furthermore, a floating charge usually will be deferred to any subsequent fixed legal charge created by the company over its assets. Similarly, if the company’s debts are under a floating charge, a floating charge holder’s asset will be made subject to or put under a lien or any set off created by the company with respect to the charged assets before crystallization. It uses the blackletter approach, relying particularly on the relevant provisions of the Nigerian Companies and Allied Matters Act and cases.","PeriodicalId":300394,"journal":{"name":"Beijing Law Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Analysis of the Nature and Effectiveness of a Floating Charge as a Security in Nigerian Law\",\"authors\":\"E. Emudainohwo\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/BLR.2021.121011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research is to examine the character and efficacy of a floating charge as a security in Nigerian law. It argues that the disadvantages of a floating charge are so much making it a vulnerable security. The charge holder runs the risk of the company dissipating the assets attached to the charge which arguably is the most serious risk the charge holder faces. Furthermore, a floating charge usually will be deferred to any subsequent fixed legal charge created by the company over its assets. Similarly, if the company’s debts are under a floating charge, a floating charge holder’s asset will be made subject to or put under a lien or any set off created by the company with respect to the charged assets before crystallization. It uses the blackletter approach, relying particularly on the relevant provisions of the Nigerian Companies and Allied Matters Act and cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beijing Law Review\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beijing Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/BLR.2021.121011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beijing Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/BLR.2021.121011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是考察浮动收费的性质和效力作为安全在尼日利亚的法律。它认为浮动收费的缺点是如此之多,使得它成为一种脆弱的安全措施。押记持有人承担着公司分散押记资产的风险,这可以说是押记持有人面临的最严重的风险。此外,浮动费用通常会递延到公司对其资产产生的任何后续固定法律费用。同样,如果公司的债务属于浮动押记,则浮动押记持有人的资产将在结晶前受到或置于留置权之下,或受到公司对所押记资产的任何抵销。它使用黑体字方法,特别依赖于尼日利亚公司和相关事务法案和案例的相关规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Analysis of the Nature and Effectiveness of a Floating Charge as a Security in Nigerian Law
The purpose of this research is to examine the character and efficacy of a floating charge as a security in Nigerian law. It argues that the disadvantages of a floating charge are so much making it a vulnerable security. The charge holder runs the risk of the company dissipating the assets attached to the charge which arguably is the most serious risk the charge holder faces. Furthermore, a floating charge usually will be deferred to any subsequent fixed legal charge created by the company over its assets. Similarly, if the company’s debts are under a floating charge, a floating charge holder’s asset will be made subject to or put under a lien or any set off created by the company with respect to the charged assets before crystallization. It uses the blackletter approach, relying particularly on the relevant provisions of the Nigerian Companies and Allied Matters Act and cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信