{"title":"重读一种特殊语言中不认识的单词","authors":"Pierre Zweigenbaum, N. Grabar","doi":"10.3115/1118149.1118153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose two internal methods for accenting unknown words, which both learn on a reference set of accented words the contexts of occurrence of the various accented forms of a given letter. One method is adapted from POS tagging, the other is based on finite state transducers.We show experimental results for letter e on the French version of the Medical Subject Headings thesaurus. With the best training set, the tagging method obtains a precision-recall breakeven point of 84.2±4.4% and the transducer method 83.8±4.5% (with a baseline at 64%) for the unknown words that contain this letter. A consensus combination of both increases precision to 92.0±3.7% with a recall of 75%. We perform an error analysis and discuss further steps that might help improve over the current performance.","PeriodicalId":339993,"journal":{"name":"ACL Workshop on Natural Language Processing in the Biomedical Domain","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accenting unknown words in a specialized language\",\"authors\":\"Pierre Zweigenbaum, N. Grabar\",\"doi\":\"10.3115/1118149.1118153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose two internal methods for accenting unknown words, which both learn on a reference set of accented words the contexts of occurrence of the various accented forms of a given letter. One method is adapted from POS tagging, the other is based on finite state transducers.We show experimental results for letter e on the French version of the Medical Subject Headings thesaurus. With the best training set, the tagging method obtains a precision-recall breakeven point of 84.2±4.4% and the transducer method 83.8±4.5% (with a baseline at 64%) for the unknown words that contain this letter. A consensus combination of both increases precision to 92.0±3.7% with a recall of 75%. We perform an error analysis and discuss further steps that might help improve over the current performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACL Workshop on Natural Language Processing in the Biomedical Domain\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACL Workshop on Natural Language Processing in the Biomedical Domain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3115/1118149.1118153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACL Workshop on Natural Language Processing in the Biomedical Domain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1118149.1118153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We propose two internal methods for accenting unknown words, which both learn on a reference set of accented words the contexts of occurrence of the various accented forms of a given letter. One method is adapted from POS tagging, the other is based on finite state transducers.We show experimental results for letter e on the French version of the Medical Subject Headings thesaurus. With the best training set, the tagging method obtains a precision-recall breakeven point of 84.2±4.4% and the transducer method 83.8±4.5% (with a baseline at 64%) for the unknown words that contain this letter. A consensus combination of both increases precision to 92.0±3.7% with a recall of 75%. We perform an error analysis and discuss further steps that might help improve over the current performance.