第179D条商业楼宇能源效益税扣除的正面收入及经济影响

Ike Brannon
{"title":"第179D条商业楼宇能源效益税扣除的正面收入及经济影响","authors":"Ike Brannon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3493233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States Internal Revenue Code has had a tax deduction for the design of energy efficient public or commercial buildings since 2005. However, this tax break has always been a short-term provision, extended near year end for a year or two at a time, largely because of budget exigencies created by Congressional PAYGO rules. Since the provision ostensibly costs the federal government a modicum of foregone revenue, Congress must find a way to make up for that revenue. <br><br>However, a proper accounting for the true cost savings from reduced energy consumption from the implementation of 179D would demonstrate that the provision almost assuredly saves governments--the federal, state, and local altogether--money from its implementation, by allowing local governments to overcome purely political short-term budget constraints and allowing them to make decisions that are best for taxpayers in the long run by incentivizing cost-effective energy-saving investments.","PeriodicalId":388441,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Positive Revenue and Economic Impact of Section 179D the Commercial Buildings Energy-Efficiency Tax Deduction\",\"authors\":\"Ike Brannon\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3493233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The United States Internal Revenue Code has had a tax deduction for the design of energy efficient public or commercial buildings since 2005. However, this tax break has always been a short-term provision, extended near year end for a year or two at a time, largely because of budget exigencies created by Congressional PAYGO rules. Since the provision ostensibly costs the federal government a modicum of foregone revenue, Congress must find a way to make up for that revenue. <br><br>However, a proper accounting for the true cost savings from reduced energy consumption from the implementation of 179D would demonstrate that the provision almost assuredly saves governments--the federal, state, and local altogether--money from its implementation, by allowing local governments to overcome purely political short-term budget constraints and allowing them to make decisions that are best for taxpayers in the long run by incentivizing cost-effective energy-saving investments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2005年以来,美国国内税收法对节能公共或商业建筑的设计进行了减税。然而,这项税收减免一直是一项短期规定,在接近年底时每次延长一两年,主要是因为国会现收现付规则造成的预算紧急情况。由于该条款表面上让联邦政府损失了一小部分收入,国会必须想办法弥补这部分收入。然而,对179D的实施所减少的能源消耗所节省的真正成本进行适当的计算将表明,该条款几乎可以肯定地为联邦、州和地方政府节省了资金,因为它允许地方政府克服纯粹的政治短期预算限制,并允许他们通过激励具有成本效益的节能投资来做出对纳税人最有利的长期决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Positive Revenue and Economic Impact of Section 179D the Commercial Buildings Energy-Efficiency Tax Deduction
The United States Internal Revenue Code has had a tax deduction for the design of energy efficient public or commercial buildings since 2005. However, this tax break has always been a short-term provision, extended near year end for a year or two at a time, largely because of budget exigencies created by Congressional PAYGO rules. Since the provision ostensibly costs the federal government a modicum of foregone revenue, Congress must find a way to make up for that revenue.

However, a proper accounting for the true cost savings from reduced energy consumption from the implementation of 179D would demonstrate that the provision almost assuredly saves governments--the federal, state, and local altogether--money from its implementation, by allowing local governments to overcome purely political short-term budget constraints and allowing them to make decisions that are best for taxpayers in the long run by incentivizing cost-effective energy-saving investments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信