开发人员文档的用户体验测试- OceanBase数据库文档的试点研究

Zhijun Gao, Tianshu Wang, Meina Wang, Yunhong Zhang
{"title":"开发人员文档的用户体验测试- OceanBase数据库文档的试点研究","authors":"Zhijun Gao, Tianshu Wang, Meina Wang, Yunhong Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This pilot UX study aims to establish a user experience (UX) approach for assessing the quality of developer documentation, specifically for the OceanBase database company. A usability test was designed to examine task completion rates, times, errors, and satisfaction. Additionally, biometric equipment, such as eye-tracking, EEG, facial expression recognition, and measures of visual and mental fatigue, were utilized to analyze participants’ experiences. The PANAS scale was employed to collect self-reported emotions. The hybrid evaluation method revealed that the OceanBase database documentation suffers from poor usability, understanding, and findability. The root causes of these problems include weak functionality, subpar interaction design, lack of conciseness and explanation, and inadequate structure and legibility. Participants experienced negative emotions and increased mental fatigue after using the documentation, indicating a substantial cognitive load. These findings will inform future improvements to the documentation and provide a foundational UX model for developer documentation. The UX study process may also be a reference for practitioners or researchers conducting similar research on technical documents.","PeriodicalId":423952,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UX Testing of Developer Documentation - A pilot study of OceanBase Database Documentation\",\"authors\":\"Zhijun Gao, Tianshu Wang, Meina Wang, Yunhong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This pilot UX study aims to establish a user experience (UX) approach for assessing the quality of developer documentation, specifically for the OceanBase database company. A usability test was designed to examine task completion rates, times, errors, and satisfaction. Additionally, biometric equipment, such as eye-tracking, EEG, facial expression recognition, and measures of visual and mental fatigue, were utilized to analyze participants’ experiences. The PANAS scale was employed to collect self-reported emotions. The hybrid evaluation method revealed that the OceanBase database documentation suffers from poor usability, understanding, and findability. The root causes of these problems include weak functionality, subpar interaction design, lack of conciseness and explanation, and inadequate structure and legibility. Participants experienced negative emotions and increased mental fatigue after using the documentation, indicating a substantial cognitive load. These findings will inform future improvements to the documentation and provide a foundational UX model for developer documentation. The UX study process may also be a reference for practitioners or researchers conducting similar research on technical documents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个试验性UX研究旨在建立一种用户体验(UX)方法来评估开发人员文档的质量,特别是针对OceanBase数据库公司。可用性测试的目的是检查任务完成率、时间、错误和满意度。此外,生物识别设备,如眼球追踪,脑电图,面部表情识别,以及视觉和精神疲劳的测量,被用来分析参与者的经历。采用PANAS量表收集自我报告情绪。混合评估方法表明,OceanBase数据库文档的可用性、可理解性和可查找性都很差。这些问题的根本原因包括功能薄弱、交互设计欠佳、缺乏简洁性和解释、结构和易读性不足。参与者在使用文件后经历了负面情绪和增加的精神疲劳,表明有大量的认知负荷。这些发现将为文档的未来改进提供信息,并为开发人员文档提供一个基本的UX模型。用户体验研究过程也可以作为实践者或研究人员对技术文档进行类似研究的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
UX Testing of Developer Documentation - A pilot study of OceanBase Database Documentation
This pilot UX study aims to establish a user experience (UX) approach for assessing the quality of developer documentation, specifically for the OceanBase database company. A usability test was designed to examine task completion rates, times, errors, and satisfaction. Additionally, biometric equipment, such as eye-tracking, EEG, facial expression recognition, and measures of visual and mental fatigue, were utilized to analyze participants’ experiences. The PANAS scale was employed to collect self-reported emotions. The hybrid evaluation method revealed that the OceanBase database documentation suffers from poor usability, understanding, and findability. The root causes of these problems include weak functionality, subpar interaction design, lack of conciseness and explanation, and inadequate structure and legibility. Participants experienced negative emotions and increased mental fatigue after using the documentation, indicating a substantial cognitive load. These findings will inform future improvements to the documentation and provide a foundational UX model for developer documentation. The UX study process may also be a reference for practitioners or researchers conducting similar research on technical documents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信