透过国际环境与人权法的棱镜看——国际民事核责任法与印度例外论的呼唤

S. Bhattacharjee
{"title":"透过国际环境与人权法的棱镜看——国际民事核责任法与印度例外论的呼唤","authors":"S. Bhattacharjee","doi":"10.1504/IJNUCL.2012.048430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the spectre of climate change and competition over fossil fuels have led energy-hungry states towards nuclear power, liability rules for nuclear damage have acquired increased significance. However, many of the core common elements of the existing international legal regimes on civil nuclear liability – channelling of liability, quantum and temporal limits, definition of harm, etc. – are not only based on outdated assumptions on the price and utility of nuclear energy, but also conflict with contemporary international environmental law principles. This gulf creates negative incentives against precautionary measures, limits compensation available for potential victims and lends artificial competitiveness to nuclear power. As a result these international regimes cannot, in their present form, serve as appropriate models for Indian attempts at institutionalisation of its liability norms.","PeriodicalId":443808,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nuclear Law","volume":"173 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Looking Through the Prism of International Environment and Human Rights Law – International Civil Nuclear Liability Law and a Call for Indian Exceptionalism\",\"authors\":\"S. Bhattacharjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJNUCL.2012.048430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the spectre of climate change and competition over fossil fuels have led energy-hungry states towards nuclear power, liability rules for nuclear damage have acquired increased significance. However, many of the core common elements of the existing international legal regimes on civil nuclear liability – channelling of liability, quantum and temporal limits, definition of harm, etc. – are not only based on outdated assumptions on the price and utility of nuclear energy, but also conflict with contemporary international environmental law principles. This gulf creates negative incentives against precautionary measures, limits compensation available for potential victims and lends artificial competitiveness to nuclear power. As a result these international regimes cannot, in their present form, serve as appropriate models for Indian attempts at institutionalisation of its liability norms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nuclear Law\",\"volume\":\"173 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nuclear Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNUCL.2012.048430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nuclear Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNUCL.2012.048430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着气候变化的幽灵和对化石燃料的竞争促使能源饥渴的国家转向核电,核损害的责任规则变得越来越重要。然而,现行民事核责任国际法律制度的许多核心共同要素- -责任的界定、数量和时间限制、危害的定义等- -不仅是基于过时的关于核能价格和效用的假设,而且与当代国际环境法原则相冲突。这种差距造成了对预防措施的负面激励,限制了对潜在受害者的补偿,并人为地赋予了核电竞争力。因此,以目前的形式,这些国际制度不能作为印度试图将其责任规范制度化的适当模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Looking Through the Prism of International Environment and Human Rights Law – International Civil Nuclear Liability Law and a Call for Indian Exceptionalism
As the spectre of climate change and competition over fossil fuels have led energy-hungry states towards nuclear power, liability rules for nuclear damage have acquired increased significance. However, many of the core common elements of the existing international legal regimes on civil nuclear liability – channelling of liability, quantum and temporal limits, definition of harm, etc. – are not only based on outdated assumptions on the price and utility of nuclear energy, but also conflict with contemporary international environmental law principles. This gulf creates negative incentives against precautionary measures, limits compensation available for potential victims and lends artificial competitiveness to nuclear power. As a result these international regimes cannot, in their present form, serve as appropriate models for Indian attempts at institutionalisation of its liability norms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信