入学、受教育程度和四分之一的出生:一个关于晚育的警示故事

R. Barua, K. Lang
{"title":"入学、受教育程度和四分之一的出生:一个关于晚育的警示故事","authors":"R. Barua, K. Lang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1437617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Partly in response to increased testing and accountability, states and districts have been raising the minimum school entry age, but existing studies show mixed results regarding the effects of entry age. These studies may be severely biased because they violate the monotonicity assumption needed for LATE. We propose an instrument not subject to this bias and show no effect on the educational attainment of children born in the fourth quarter of moving from a December 31 to an earlier cutoff. We then estimate a structural model of optimal entry age that reconciles the different IV estimates including ours. We find that one standard instrument is badly biased but that the other diverges from ours because it estimates a different LATE. We also find that an early entry age cutoff that is applied loosely (as in the 1950s) is beneficial but one that is strictly enforced is not.","PeriodicalId":142467,"journal":{"name":"Labor: Human Capital","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School Entry, Educational Attainment and Quarter of Birth: A Cautionary Tale of LATE\",\"authors\":\"R. Barua, K. Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1437617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Partly in response to increased testing and accountability, states and districts have been raising the minimum school entry age, but existing studies show mixed results regarding the effects of entry age. These studies may be severely biased because they violate the monotonicity assumption needed for LATE. We propose an instrument not subject to this bias and show no effect on the educational attainment of children born in the fourth quarter of moving from a December 31 to an earlier cutoff. We then estimate a structural model of optimal entry age that reconciles the different IV estimates including ours. We find that one standard instrument is badly biased but that the other diverges from ours because it estimates a different LATE. We also find that an early entry age cutoff that is applied loosely (as in the 1950s) is beneficial but one that is strictly enforced is not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor: Human Capital\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor: Human Capital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1437617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor: Human Capital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1437617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

摘要

部分是为了应对考试和问责制的增加,各州和地区一直在提高最低入学年龄,但现有的研究显示,入学年龄的影响好坏参半。这些研究可能存在严重偏差,因为它们违反了LATE所需的单调性假设。我们提出了一个不受这种偏见影响的工具,并表明从12月31日移到更早的截止日期对第四季度出生的儿童的教育程度没有影响。然后,我们估计了一个结构模型的最佳进入年龄,调和不同的IV估计,包括我们的。我们发现一个标准工具有严重偏差,但另一个标准工具偏离了我们的标准,因为它估计了不同的LATE。我们还发现,宽松的提前入学年龄限制(如20世纪50年代)是有益的,但严格执行的年龄限制则没有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
School Entry, Educational Attainment and Quarter of Birth: A Cautionary Tale of LATE
Partly in response to increased testing and accountability, states and districts have been raising the minimum school entry age, but existing studies show mixed results regarding the effects of entry age. These studies may be severely biased because they violate the monotonicity assumption needed for LATE. We propose an instrument not subject to this bias and show no effect on the educational attainment of children born in the fourth quarter of moving from a December 31 to an earlier cutoff. We then estimate a structural model of optimal entry age that reconciles the different IV estimates including ours. We find that one standard instrument is badly biased but that the other diverges from ours because it estimates a different LATE. We also find that an early entry age cutoff that is applied loosely (as in the 1950s) is beneficial but one that is strictly enforced is not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信