一阶逻辑图微分的量词深度上界

Sandra Kiefer, Pascal Schweitzer
{"title":"一阶逻辑图微分的量词深度上界","authors":"Sandra Kiefer, Pascal Schweitzer","doi":"10.1145/2933575.2933595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that on graphs with n vertices the 2-dimensional Weisfei-ler-Leman algorithm requires at most O(n2/log(n)) iterations to reach stabilization. This in particular shows that the previously best, trivial upper bound of O(n2) is asymptotically not tight. In the logic setting this translates to the statement that if two graphs of size n can be distinguished by a formula in first order logic with counting with 3 variables (i.e., in C3) then they can also be distinguished by a C3-formula that has quantifier depth at most O (n2/log(n)).To prove the result we define a game between two players that enables us to decouple the causal dependencies between the processes happening simultaneously over several iterations of the algorithm. This allows us to treat large color classes and small color classes separately. As part of our proof we show that for graphs with bounded color class size, the number of iterations until stabilization is at most linear in the number of vertices. This also yields a corresponding statement in first order logic with counting.Similar results can be obtained for the respective logic without counting quantifiers, i.e., for the logic L3.","PeriodicalId":206395,"journal":{"name":"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":"173 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upper Bounds on the Quantifier Depth for Graph Differentiation in First Order Logic\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Kiefer, Pascal Schweitzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2933575.2933595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We show that on graphs with n vertices the 2-dimensional Weisfei-ler-Leman algorithm requires at most O(n2/log(n)) iterations to reach stabilization. This in particular shows that the previously best, trivial upper bound of O(n2) is asymptotically not tight. In the logic setting this translates to the statement that if two graphs of size n can be distinguished by a formula in first order logic with counting with 3 variables (i.e., in C3) then they can also be distinguished by a C3-formula that has quantifier depth at most O (n2/log(n)).To prove the result we define a game between two players that enables us to decouple the causal dependencies between the processes happening simultaneously over several iterations of the algorithm. This allows us to treat large color classes and small color classes separately. As part of our proof we show that for graphs with bounded color class size, the number of iterations until stabilization is at most linear in the number of vertices. This also yields a corresponding statement in first order logic with counting.Similar results can be obtained for the respective logic without counting quantifiers, i.e., for the logic L3.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)\",\"volume\":\"173 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2933575.2933595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2933575.2933595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

我们证明了在有n个顶点的图上,二维Weisfei-ler-Leman算法最多需要O(n2/log(n))次迭代才能达到稳定。这特别表明,O(n2)的先前最佳的平凡上界是渐近不紧的。在逻辑设置中,这可以解释为,如果两个大小为n的图可以用带有3个变量计数的一阶逻辑公式来区分(即,在C3中),那么它们也可以用量词深度最多为O (n2/log(n))的C3公式来区分。为了证明结果,我们定义了两个参与者之间的博弈,使我们能够在算法的几个迭代中解耦同时发生的过程之间的因果关系。这允许我们分别处理大颜色类和小颜色类。作为我们证明的一部分,我们表明,对于具有有限颜色类大小的图,直到稳定的迭代次数在顶点数量上最多是线性的。这也会产生一个带有计数的一阶逻辑的相应语句。对于不计数量词的相应逻辑,即逻辑L3,可以得到类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Upper Bounds on the Quantifier Depth for Graph Differentiation in First Order Logic
We show that on graphs with n vertices the 2-dimensional Weisfei-ler-Leman algorithm requires at most O(n2/log(n)) iterations to reach stabilization. This in particular shows that the previously best, trivial upper bound of O(n2) is asymptotically not tight. In the logic setting this translates to the statement that if two graphs of size n can be distinguished by a formula in first order logic with counting with 3 variables (i.e., in C3) then they can also be distinguished by a C3-formula that has quantifier depth at most O (n2/log(n)).To prove the result we define a game between two players that enables us to decouple the causal dependencies between the processes happening simultaneously over several iterations of the algorithm. This allows us to treat large color classes and small color classes separately. As part of our proof we show that for graphs with bounded color class size, the number of iterations until stabilization is at most linear in the number of vertices. This also yields a corresponding statement in first order logic with counting.Similar results can be obtained for the respective logic without counting quantifiers, i.e., for the logic L3.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信