{"title":"《以伪造契约为形式的公证法职业渎职行为》(登巴萨地方法院判决研究第89号/Pid.B)。2020 / Pn Dps)","authors":"Agung Pramono, K. Kuswardani","doi":"10.53017/ujsah.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notaries are public offcial who carrying out their duties and authorities are based on the principles of honesty, trustworthiness, and impartiality. There is even a Notary in Denpasar Bali who commits a violation as stated in the Judge's Decision Number 89/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps.The purpose of the research to describes the Judge’s Decision from the act aspect and malpraktice form in criminal law perspective. The research is doctrinal, then secondary data is as main data (reference, legal document that are relevant to the problems). Data collecting through library research. Data analysis using criminal law principles. The result show that the act of notary in the Judge’s Decision accordance with Article 264 paragraph (1) and (2) jo Article 56 of the Penal Code. Therefor a notary makes a mistake and must be responsible. Furthemore, the act of notary is called criminal malpractice, but also standart of conduct.","PeriodicalId":315613,"journal":{"name":"Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malpractice of Notary Law Profession in the Form of Authentic Deed Forgery (Denpasar District Court Decision Study Number 89/Pid.B.2020/Pn Dps)\",\"authors\":\"Agung Pramono, K. Kuswardani\",\"doi\":\"10.53017/ujsah.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Notaries are public offcial who carrying out their duties and authorities are based on the principles of honesty, trustworthiness, and impartiality. There is even a Notary in Denpasar Bali who commits a violation as stated in the Judge's Decision Number 89/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps.The purpose of the research to describes the Judge’s Decision from the act aspect and malpraktice form in criminal law perspective. The research is doctrinal, then secondary data is as main data (reference, legal document that are relevant to the problems). Data collecting through library research. Data analysis using criminal law principles. The result show that the act of notary in the Judge’s Decision accordance with Article 264 paragraph (1) and (2) jo Article 56 of the Penal Code. Therefor a notary makes a mistake and must be responsible. Furthemore, the act of notary is called criminal malpractice, but also standart of conduct.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53017/ujsah.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53017/ujsah.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Malpractice of Notary Law Profession in the Form of Authentic Deed Forgery (Denpasar District Court Decision Study Number 89/Pid.B.2020/Pn Dps)
Notaries are public offcial who carrying out their duties and authorities are based on the principles of honesty, trustworthiness, and impartiality. There is even a Notary in Denpasar Bali who commits a violation as stated in the Judge's Decision Number 89/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps.The purpose of the research to describes the Judge’s Decision from the act aspect and malpraktice form in criminal law perspective. The research is doctrinal, then secondary data is as main data (reference, legal document that are relevant to the problems). Data collecting through library research. Data analysis using criminal law principles. The result show that the act of notary in the Judge’s Decision accordance with Article 264 paragraph (1) and (2) jo Article 56 of the Penal Code. Therefor a notary makes a mistake and must be responsible. Furthemore, the act of notary is called criminal malpractice, but also standart of conduct.