《以伪造契约为形式的公证法职业渎职行为》(登巴萨地方法院判决研究第89号/Pid.B)。2020 / Pn Dps)

Agung Pramono, K. Kuswardani
{"title":"《以伪造契约为形式的公证法职业渎职行为》(登巴萨地方法院判决研究第89号/Pid.B)。2020 / Pn Dps)","authors":"Agung Pramono, K. Kuswardani","doi":"10.53017/ujsah.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notaries are public offcial who carrying out their duties and authorities are based on the principles of honesty, trustworthiness, and impartiality. There is even a Notary in Denpasar Bali who commits a violation as stated in the Judge's Decision Number 89/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps.The purpose of the research to describes the Judge’s Decision from the act aspect and malpraktice form in criminal law perspective. The research is doctrinal, then secondary data is as main data (reference, legal document that are relevant to the problems). Data collecting through library research. Data analysis using criminal law principles. The result show that the act of notary in the Judge’s Decision accordance with Article 264 paragraph (1) and (2) jo Article 56 of the Penal Code. Therefor a notary makes a mistake and must be responsible. Furthemore, the act of notary is called criminal malpractice, but also standart of conduct.","PeriodicalId":315613,"journal":{"name":"Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malpractice of Notary Law Profession in the Form of Authentic Deed Forgery (Denpasar District Court Decision Study Number 89/Pid.B.2020/Pn Dps)\",\"authors\":\"Agung Pramono, K. Kuswardani\",\"doi\":\"10.53017/ujsah.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Notaries are public offcial who carrying out their duties and authorities are based on the principles of honesty, trustworthiness, and impartiality. There is even a Notary in Denpasar Bali who commits a violation as stated in the Judge's Decision Number 89/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps.The purpose of the research to describes the Judge’s Decision from the act aspect and malpraktice form in criminal law perspective. The research is doctrinal, then secondary data is as main data (reference, legal document that are relevant to the problems). Data collecting through library research. Data analysis using criminal law principles. The result show that the act of notary in the Judge’s Decision accordance with Article 264 paragraph (1) and (2) jo Article 56 of the Penal Code. Therefor a notary makes a mistake and must be responsible. Furthemore, the act of notary is called criminal malpractice, but also standart of conduct.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53017/ujsah.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53017/ujsah.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公证员是在诚实、守信、公正的原则基础上履行职责和权力的公职人员。在巴厘岛登巴萨甚至有一名公证人违反了第89/Pid号法官判决。B / 2020 / PN Dps。研究的目的是从行为层面和渎职形式两方面对法官判决进行刑法视角的描述。研究是理论性的,然后次要数据作为主要数据(参考文献,与问题相关的法律文件)。通过图书馆调研收集数据。运用刑法原理进行数据分析。结果表明,法官判决书中的公证行为符合《刑法典》第264条第1款和第56条第2款的规定。因此,公证员犯了错误,必须承担责任。此外,公证行为被称为刑事渎职,也是一种行为规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Malpractice of Notary Law Profession in the Form of Authentic Deed Forgery (Denpasar District Court Decision Study Number 89/Pid.B.2020/Pn Dps)
Notaries are public offcial who carrying out their duties and authorities are based on the principles of honesty, trustworthiness, and impartiality. There is even a Notary in Denpasar Bali who commits a violation as stated in the Judge's Decision Number 89/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps.The purpose of the research to describes the Judge’s Decision from the act aspect and malpraktice form in criminal law perspective. The research is doctrinal, then secondary data is as main data (reference, legal document that are relevant to the problems). Data collecting through library research. Data analysis using criminal law principles. The result show that the act of notary in the Judge’s Decision accordance with Article 264 paragraph (1) and (2) jo Article 56 of the Penal Code. Therefor a notary makes a mistake and must be responsible. Furthemore, the act of notary is called criminal malpractice, but also standart of conduct.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信