根据印度尼西亚共和国法律,贷款资本对家庭经营活动的保证,1998年第10号,1992年银行业法第7号的改变(研究PT. BANKALTIMTARA braninda)

Namira Meidina Aulia, Parlindungan Pasaribu
{"title":"根据印度尼西亚共和国法律,贷款资本对家庭经营活动的保证,1998年第10号,1992年银行业法第7号的改变(研究PT. BANKALTIMTARA braninda)","authors":"Namira Meidina Aulia, Parlindungan Pasaribu","doi":"10.24903/YRS.V11I2.519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find out the form of Legal Assurance Guarantee on Capital Lending of Household Business Activity in terms of Law Number 10 the year 1998 Concerning Amendment to Law Number 7 of 1992 Concerning Banking and Constraints in Capital Lending Process by Household Business Actor in Banking. This research is normative law research that comes from primary law material and secondary law material. The result of the research shows that the form of Assurance of Legal Certainty to the Capital Lending of Household Business Activity, namely Forms of Guarantee that is in Tangible Assurance Form, Intangible Assurance Form, Form of Guaranteed Movement, Form of Assurance of Permanent / Unmoving Equipment. And the form of legal certainty to the lending of the capital of household business activity that is in the written form contained in the Letter of Credit Agreement (SPPU). Then to the Constraints in Capital Loan Processing by Household Business Actors in Banking namely Incomplete and Valid Data, Procedure of business loan to bank is often time-consuming, the process is complicated and the conditions are not easily fulfilled, Business Considered Less Productive, Absence of Collateral / Additional Guarantees, Bad Business Legality, Bad Credit History. Therefore, it is suggested that in the future, the bank can further facilitate the debtor in applying for the household capital loan, although the bank applies the prudential principle by requiring the collateral to guarantee its legal certainty, the bank is also expected not based on the collateral aspect but also the bank consider other aspects.  ","PeriodicalId":187233,"journal":{"name":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jaminan Kepastian Hukum Atas Pinjaman Modal Terhadap Kegiatan Usaha Rumah Tangga Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perbankan (STUDI DI PT. BANKALTIMTARA CABANG SAMARINDA)\",\"authors\":\"Namira Meidina Aulia, Parlindungan Pasaribu\",\"doi\":\"10.24903/YRS.V11I2.519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to find out the form of Legal Assurance Guarantee on Capital Lending of Household Business Activity in terms of Law Number 10 the year 1998 Concerning Amendment to Law Number 7 of 1992 Concerning Banking and Constraints in Capital Lending Process by Household Business Actor in Banking. This research is normative law research that comes from primary law material and secondary law material. The result of the research shows that the form of Assurance of Legal Certainty to the Capital Lending of Household Business Activity, namely Forms of Guarantee that is in Tangible Assurance Form, Intangible Assurance Form, Form of Guaranteed Movement, Form of Assurance of Permanent / Unmoving Equipment. And the form of legal certainty to the lending of the capital of household business activity that is in the written form contained in the Letter of Credit Agreement (SPPU). Then to the Constraints in Capital Loan Processing by Household Business Actors in Banking namely Incomplete and Valid Data, Procedure of business loan to bank is often time-consuming, the process is complicated and the conditions are not easily fulfilled, Business Considered Less Productive, Absence of Collateral / Additional Guarantees, Bad Business Legality, Bad Credit History. Therefore, it is suggested that in the future, the bank can further facilitate the debtor in applying for the household capital loan, although the bank applies the prudential principle by requiring the collateral to guarantee its legal certainty, the bank is also expected not based on the collateral aspect but also the bank consider other aspects.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":187233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24903/YRS.V11I2.519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24903/YRS.V11I2.519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在根据1998年第10号《关于修改1992年第7号《银行法》的法律,找出家庭商业活动资本借贷的法律保证形式,以及家庭商业行为者在银行资本借贷过程中的限制。本研究是来源于一手法律资料和第二手法律资料的规范性法律研究。研究结果表明,法律确定性担保形式对家庭经营活动资金借贷的影响主要有:有形担保形式、无形担保形式、担保移动形式、永久/不移动设备担保形式。以及以书面形式包含在信用证协议(SPPU)中的家庭商业活动资金借贷的法律确定性形式。其次是制约银行家庭商业行为者处理资金贷款的因素,即数据不完整和有效,企业向银行贷款的程序往往耗时,过程复杂,条件不易满足,业务被认为生产率较低,缺乏抵押品/额外担保,业务合法性差,信用记录不良。因此,建议在未来,银行可以进一步便利债务人申请家庭资金贷款,虽然银行采用审慎原则,要求抵押物保证其法律确定性,但也希望银行不以抵押物方面为依据,还考虑其他方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jaminan Kepastian Hukum Atas Pinjaman Modal Terhadap Kegiatan Usaha Rumah Tangga Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perbankan (STUDI DI PT. BANKALTIMTARA CABANG SAMARINDA)
This study aims to find out the form of Legal Assurance Guarantee on Capital Lending of Household Business Activity in terms of Law Number 10 the year 1998 Concerning Amendment to Law Number 7 of 1992 Concerning Banking and Constraints in Capital Lending Process by Household Business Actor in Banking. This research is normative law research that comes from primary law material and secondary law material. The result of the research shows that the form of Assurance of Legal Certainty to the Capital Lending of Household Business Activity, namely Forms of Guarantee that is in Tangible Assurance Form, Intangible Assurance Form, Form of Guaranteed Movement, Form of Assurance of Permanent / Unmoving Equipment. And the form of legal certainty to the lending of the capital of household business activity that is in the written form contained in the Letter of Credit Agreement (SPPU). Then to the Constraints in Capital Loan Processing by Household Business Actors in Banking namely Incomplete and Valid Data, Procedure of business loan to bank is often time-consuming, the process is complicated and the conditions are not easily fulfilled, Business Considered Less Productive, Absence of Collateral / Additional Guarantees, Bad Business Legality, Bad Credit History. Therefore, it is suggested that in the future, the bank can further facilitate the debtor in applying for the household capital loan, although the bank applies the prudential principle by requiring the collateral to guarantee its legal certainty, the bank is also expected not based on the collateral aspect but also the bank consider other aspects.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信