委托代理VCG合同

R. Lavi, Elisheva S. Shamash
{"title":"委托代理VCG合同","authors":"R. Lavi, Elisheva S. Shamash","doi":"10.1145/3328526.3329570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study a game of complete information with multiple principals and multiple common agents. Each agent takes an action that can affect the payoffs of all principals. Prat and Rustichini (Econometrica, 2003) who introduce this model assume first price contracts: each principal offers monetary transfers to each agent conditional on the action taken by the agent. We define a notion of VCG contracts which are a restricted natural class of contractible contracts and study its effect on the existence of efficient pure subgame perfect equilibrium outcomes. We identify a \"unitary balancedness'' condition that is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a pure subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) with VCG contracts. As a consequence, we show that the class of instances of this game that admit an efficient SPE with VCG contracts strictly contains the class of instances of this game that admit an efficient SPE with first price contracts. Although VCG contracts broaden the existence of pure subgame perfect equilibria, we show that the worst case welfare loss in any SPE outcome with VCG contracts is not worse than the respective worst case loss with first price contracts.","PeriodicalId":416173,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Principal-Agent VCG Contracts\",\"authors\":\"R. Lavi, Elisheva S. Shamash\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3328526.3329570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study a game of complete information with multiple principals and multiple common agents. Each agent takes an action that can affect the payoffs of all principals. Prat and Rustichini (Econometrica, 2003) who introduce this model assume first price contracts: each principal offers monetary transfers to each agent conditional on the action taken by the agent. We define a notion of VCG contracts which are a restricted natural class of contractible contracts and study its effect on the existence of efficient pure subgame perfect equilibrium outcomes. We identify a \\\"unitary balancedness'' condition that is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a pure subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) with VCG contracts. As a consequence, we show that the class of instances of this game that admit an efficient SPE with VCG contracts strictly contains the class of instances of this game that admit an efficient SPE with first price contracts. Although VCG contracts broaden the existence of pure subgame perfect equilibria, we show that the worst case welfare loss in any SPE outcome with VCG contracts is not worse than the respective worst case loss with first price contracts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3328526.3329570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3328526.3329570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

研究了一个具有多个主体和多个共同代理的完全信息博弈。每个代理采取的行动会影响所有主体的收益。引入该模型的Prat和Rustichini (Econometrica, 2003)假设了第一价格契约:每个委托人向每个代理人提供货币转移,条件是代理人采取行动。本文定义了VCG契约的概念,并研究了它对有效纯子对策完美均衡结果存在性的影响。我们确定了具有VCG契约的纯子对策完美均衡(SPE)存在的“酉平衡”条件。因此,我们证明了承认具有VCG合约的有效SPE的该对策的实例类严格包含承认具有首价合约的有效SPE的该对策的实例类。尽管VCG契约扩大了纯子博弈完美均衡的存在性,但我们证明了在任何SPE结果中,VCG契约的最坏情况下的福利损失并不比第一价格契约的最坏情况损失更糟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Principal-Agent VCG Contracts
We study a game of complete information with multiple principals and multiple common agents. Each agent takes an action that can affect the payoffs of all principals. Prat and Rustichini (Econometrica, 2003) who introduce this model assume first price contracts: each principal offers monetary transfers to each agent conditional on the action taken by the agent. We define a notion of VCG contracts which are a restricted natural class of contractible contracts and study its effect on the existence of efficient pure subgame perfect equilibrium outcomes. We identify a "unitary balancedness'' condition that is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a pure subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) with VCG contracts. As a consequence, we show that the class of instances of this game that admit an efficient SPE with VCG contracts strictly contains the class of instances of this game that admit an efficient SPE with first price contracts. Although VCG contracts broaden the existence of pure subgame perfect equilibria, we show that the worst case welfare loss in any SPE outcome with VCG contracts is not worse than the respective worst case loss with first price contracts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信