立方本地损失恢复与(卫星)互联网路径上的BBR

Jörg Deutschmann, K. Hielscher, Reinhard German
{"title":"立方本地损失恢复与(卫星)互联网路径上的BBR","authors":"Jörg Deutschmann, K. Hielscher, Reinhard German","doi":"10.1109/LANMAN58293.2023.10189417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paths with high delay and packet loss are problematic for transport protocols, especially when loss-based congestion control algorithms are used. Our topology of interest is a geostationary satellite path (round trip time approx. 600 ms) with additional packet loss, which could be caused by a lossy wireless local area network. In geostationary satellite networks, Performance Enhancing Proxies split TCP connections to improve performance, but this is not possible in case of encrypted transport protocols (VPNs, QUIC). This motivates the use of local loss recovery, i.e., avoiding packet loss on specific path segments. We briefly discuss related concepts, architectures, and protocols. We then evaluate local loss recovery using a TCP tunnel on the lossy link. By means of a simple emulation setup, we demonstrate that local loss recovery has great performance benefits if CUBIC is used. It is also shown that BBR works well for high-delay and lossy paths even without local loss recovery.","PeriodicalId":416011,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CUBIC Local Loss Recovery vs. BBR on (Satellite) Internet Paths\",\"authors\":\"Jörg Deutschmann, K. Hielscher, Reinhard German\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LANMAN58293.2023.10189417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paths with high delay and packet loss are problematic for transport protocols, especially when loss-based congestion control algorithms are used. Our topology of interest is a geostationary satellite path (round trip time approx. 600 ms) with additional packet loss, which could be caused by a lossy wireless local area network. In geostationary satellite networks, Performance Enhancing Proxies split TCP connections to improve performance, but this is not possible in case of encrypted transport protocols (VPNs, QUIC). This motivates the use of local loss recovery, i.e., avoiding packet loss on specific path segments. We briefly discuss related concepts, architectures, and protocols. We then evaluate local loss recovery using a TCP tunnel on the lossy link. By means of a simple emulation setup, we demonstrate that local loss recovery has great performance benefits if CUBIC is used. It is also shown that BBR works well for high-delay and lossy paths even without local loss recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN)\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LANMAN58293.2023.10189417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LANMAN58293.2023.10189417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具有高延迟和数据包丢失的路径对于传输协议来说是有问题的,特别是当使用基于丢失的拥塞控制算法时。我们感兴趣的拓扑结构是地球同步卫星路径(往返时间近似)。600毫秒),并有额外的数据包丢失,这可能是由有损耗的无线局域网络造成的。在地球同步卫星网络中,性能增强代理拆分TCP连接以提高性能,但这在加密传输协议(vpn, QUIC)的情况下是不可能的。这激发了本地丢失恢复的使用,即避免特定路径段上的数据包丢失。我们将简要讨论相关的概念、体系结构和协议。然后,我们使用TCP隧道在有损链路上评估本地丢失恢复。通过简单的仿真设置,我们证明了如果使用CUBIC,本地丢失恢复具有很大的性能优势。结果表明,BBR在高时延和有损耗的路径下,即使没有局部损耗恢复,也能很好地工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CUBIC Local Loss Recovery vs. BBR on (Satellite) Internet Paths
Paths with high delay and packet loss are problematic for transport protocols, especially when loss-based congestion control algorithms are used. Our topology of interest is a geostationary satellite path (round trip time approx. 600 ms) with additional packet loss, which could be caused by a lossy wireless local area network. In geostationary satellite networks, Performance Enhancing Proxies split TCP connections to improve performance, but this is not possible in case of encrypted transport protocols (VPNs, QUIC). This motivates the use of local loss recovery, i.e., avoiding packet loss on specific path segments. We briefly discuss related concepts, architectures, and protocols. We then evaluate local loss recovery using a TCP tunnel on the lossy link. By means of a simple emulation setup, we demonstrate that local loss recovery has great performance benefits if CUBIC is used. It is also shown that BBR works well for high-delay and lossy paths even without local loss recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信