用TQM方法设计制造业质量管理成熟度评价模型

Teguh Prabowo, S. Saptadi, W. PurnawanAdi
{"title":"用TQM方法设计制造业质量管理成熟度评价模型","authors":"Teguh Prabowo, S. Saptadi, W. PurnawanAdi","doi":"10.31098/ic-smart.v1i1.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The design of performance assessment and measurement models is an important factor for any organization in an effort to achieve the expected goals in the future and as a tool to assess the success of the company. One of the most important performance measures is quality management. An assessment model that can be used to measure the performance of quality management is the Quality Management Maturity (QMM) Model. Until now, there has been no research related to the design of the QMM assessment model in the manufacturing industry sector. Until now, research related to the QMM Model only examines the construction industry sector, and the number is still relatively small. Even though, according to the 2020 Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia sources, the industrial sector that provides the largest contribution to Indonesia's national income in 2019 is the manufacturing industry sector. Therefore, the aim of this study is to design a QMM assessment/conceptual model in the manufacturing industry sector by identifying variables related to quality management. In this study, a literature study approach was used by examining ten journals that have a relationship with quality management. The results showed that the QMM model consisted of several levels, each of which was built by a number of quality management variables. Based on the results of the analysis of all available literature, the results of the variables at each level are obtained, namely at level 1 consisting of 2 variables, namely corporate-level quality and project level quality. Whereas at level 2, project quality level variables are divided into two variables, namely product quality and service quality. At level 3, corporate-level quality is divided into two variables, namely external management and internal management. In addition, at level 3, product quality is divided into two variables, namely physical quality and perceived quality. Meanwhile, at level 4, each variable result from level 3 is further divided into a number of variables. In external management, there are six variables, in internal management, there are 28 variables, seven variables in physical quality, four variables in perceived quality, and 19 variables in service quality.","PeriodicalId":233596,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding on International Conference of Science Management Art Research Technology","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Assessment Model of Quality Management Maturity in Manufacturing Industry with TQM Approach\",\"authors\":\"Teguh Prabowo, S. Saptadi, W. PurnawanAdi\",\"doi\":\"10.31098/ic-smart.v1i1.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The design of performance assessment and measurement models is an important factor for any organization in an effort to achieve the expected goals in the future and as a tool to assess the success of the company. One of the most important performance measures is quality management. An assessment model that can be used to measure the performance of quality management is the Quality Management Maturity (QMM) Model. Until now, there has been no research related to the design of the QMM assessment model in the manufacturing industry sector. Until now, research related to the QMM Model only examines the construction industry sector, and the number is still relatively small. Even though, according to the 2020 Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia sources, the industrial sector that provides the largest contribution to Indonesia's national income in 2019 is the manufacturing industry sector. Therefore, the aim of this study is to design a QMM assessment/conceptual model in the manufacturing industry sector by identifying variables related to quality management. In this study, a literature study approach was used by examining ten journals that have a relationship with quality management. The results showed that the QMM model consisted of several levels, each of which was built by a number of quality management variables. Based on the results of the analysis of all available literature, the results of the variables at each level are obtained, namely at level 1 consisting of 2 variables, namely corporate-level quality and project level quality. Whereas at level 2, project quality level variables are divided into two variables, namely product quality and service quality. At level 3, corporate-level quality is divided into two variables, namely external management and internal management. In addition, at level 3, product quality is divided into two variables, namely physical quality and perceived quality. Meanwhile, at level 4, each variable result from level 3 is further divided into a number of variables. In external management, there are six variables, in internal management, there are 28 variables, seven variables in physical quality, four variables in perceived quality, and 19 variables in service quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceeding on International Conference of Science Management Art Research Technology\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceeding on International Conference of Science Management Art Research Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31098/ic-smart.v1i1.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding on International Conference of Science Management Art Research Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31098/ic-smart.v1i1.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

绩效评估和测量模型的设计是任何组织在未来努力实现预期目标的重要因素,也是评估公司成功的工具。质量管理是最重要的绩效衡量标准之一。一个可以用来度量质量管理绩效的评估模型是质量管理成熟度(QMM)模型。到目前为止,在制造业领域还没有关于QMM评估模型设计的相关研究。到目前为止,与QMM模型相关的研究只考察了建筑业部门,数量仍然相对较少。尽管如此,根据《2020年印尼统计年鉴》的资料,2019年对印尼国民收入贡献最大的工业部门是制造业。因此,本研究的目的是通过识别与质量管理相关的变量,设计一个制造业部门的QMM评估/概念模型。在本研究中,采用文献研究法对与质量管理有关的十种期刊进行了研究。结果表明,质量管理模型由若干层次组成,每一层次由若干质量管理变量构成。根据所有文献的分析结果,得到每个层次变量的结果,即在由2个变量组成的层次1,即企业层次质量和项目层次质量。而在第二级,项目质量水平变量分为两个变量,即产品质量和服务质量。在第3层,将公司级质量分为两个变量,即外部管理和内部管理。另外,在第3层,将产品质量分为物理质量和感知质量两个变量。同时,在第4层,从第3层得到的每个变量结果被进一步划分为多个变量。外部管理有6个变量,内部管理有28个变量,其中物理质量有7个变量,感知质量有4个变量,服务质量有19个变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing Assessment Model of Quality Management Maturity in Manufacturing Industry with TQM Approach
The design of performance assessment and measurement models is an important factor for any organization in an effort to achieve the expected goals in the future and as a tool to assess the success of the company. One of the most important performance measures is quality management. An assessment model that can be used to measure the performance of quality management is the Quality Management Maturity (QMM) Model. Until now, there has been no research related to the design of the QMM assessment model in the manufacturing industry sector. Until now, research related to the QMM Model only examines the construction industry sector, and the number is still relatively small. Even though, according to the 2020 Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia sources, the industrial sector that provides the largest contribution to Indonesia's national income in 2019 is the manufacturing industry sector. Therefore, the aim of this study is to design a QMM assessment/conceptual model in the manufacturing industry sector by identifying variables related to quality management. In this study, a literature study approach was used by examining ten journals that have a relationship with quality management. The results showed that the QMM model consisted of several levels, each of which was built by a number of quality management variables. Based on the results of the analysis of all available literature, the results of the variables at each level are obtained, namely at level 1 consisting of 2 variables, namely corporate-level quality and project level quality. Whereas at level 2, project quality level variables are divided into two variables, namely product quality and service quality. At level 3, corporate-level quality is divided into two variables, namely external management and internal management. In addition, at level 3, product quality is divided into two variables, namely physical quality and perceived quality. Meanwhile, at level 4, each variable result from level 3 is further divided into a number of variables. In external management, there are six variables, in internal management, there are 28 variables, seven variables in physical quality, four variables in perceived quality, and 19 variables in service quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信