你也可以有你的信任和计算:不确定性,可信度和威廉姆森论文

Harvey S. James, Jr.
{"title":"你也可以有你的信任和计算:不确定性,可信度和威廉姆森论文","authors":"Harvey S. James, Jr.","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2351870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Williamson argues that a principal will only trust an agent when there are safeguards to ensure the agent has an incentive for trustworthiness. However, such circumstances are devoid of vulnerability and possibility for betrayal. Williamson claims that this is not trust at all. I argue that a principal can be calculative in her decisions to trust an agent but be genuinely vulnerable to betrayal as well. The key is in distinguishing between an environment of risk and one of uncertainty. Uncertainty creates vulnerabilities for principals because of the difficulty in identifying and erecting safeguards that fully assure agent trustworthiness. In such conditions, a principal will also need to rely on the moral disposition of the agent to refrain from engaging in opportunistic behaviour. However, a reliance on moral dispositions creates the possibility of real betrayal. Thus, in an environment of uncertainty, a reliance on the moral dispositions of others means you can have your trust and calculativeness, too.","PeriodicalId":119086,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Institutions & Transition Economics: Firm Governance (Topic)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"You Can Have Your Trust and Calculativeness, Too: Uncertainty, Trustworthiness and the Williamson Thesis\",\"authors\":\"Harvey S. James, Jr.\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2351870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Williamson argues that a principal will only trust an agent when there are safeguards to ensure the agent has an incentive for trustworthiness. However, such circumstances are devoid of vulnerability and possibility for betrayal. Williamson claims that this is not trust at all. I argue that a principal can be calculative in her decisions to trust an agent but be genuinely vulnerable to betrayal as well. The key is in distinguishing between an environment of risk and one of uncertainty. Uncertainty creates vulnerabilities for principals because of the difficulty in identifying and erecting safeguards that fully assure agent trustworthiness. In such conditions, a principal will also need to rely on the moral disposition of the agent to refrain from engaging in opportunistic behaviour. However, a reliance on moral dispositions creates the possibility of real betrayal. Thus, in an environment of uncertainty, a reliance on the moral dispositions of others means you can have your trust and calculativeness, too.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Institutions & Transition Economics: Firm Governance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Institutions & Transition Economics: Firm Governance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2351870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Institutions & Transition Economics: Firm Governance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2351870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

威廉姆森认为,只有当有保障措施确保代理人有值得信赖的动机时,委托人才会信任代理人。然而,这样的环境没有脆弱和背叛的可能性。威廉姆森声称,这根本不是信任。我认为,委托人在决定信任代理人时可能会精打细算,但也可能真正容易受到背叛。关键在于区分风险环境和不确定性环境。不确定性给委托人造成了脆弱性,因为难以识别和建立充分保证代理人可信度的保障措施。在这种情况下,委托人还需要依靠代理人的道德倾向来避免机会主义行为。然而,对道德倾向的依赖产生了真正背叛的可能性。因此,在一个不确定的环境中,对他人道德倾向的依赖意味着你也可以拥有信任和计算能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
You Can Have Your Trust and Calculativeness, Too: Uncertainty, Trustworthiness and the Williamson Thesis
Williamson argues that a principal will only trust an agent when there are safeguards to ensure the agent has an incentive for trustworthiness. However, such circumstances are devoid of vulnerability and possibility for betrayal. Williamson claims that this is not trust at all. I argue that a principal can be calculative in her decisions to trust an agent but be genuinely vulnerable to betrayal as well. The key is in distinguishing between an environment of risk and one of uncertainty. Uncertainty creates vulnerabilities for principals because of the difficulty in identifying and erecting safeguards that fully assure agent trustworthiness. In such conditions, a principal will also need to rely on the moral disposition of the agent to refrain from engaging in opportunistic behaviour. However, a reliance on moral dispositions creates the possibility of real betrayal. Thus, in an environment of uncertainty, a reliance on the moral dispositions of others means you can have your trust and calculativeness, too.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信