杰出的非洲和西方女权主义者对外胚发生的看法

B. Dasaolu, E. Ofuasia, Ibiyemi Sheriff Olasunkanmi
{"title":"杰出的非洲和西方女权主义者对外胚发生的看法","authors":"B. Dasaolu, E. Ofuasia, Ibiyemi Sheriff Olasunkanmi","doi":"10.1080/18186874.2022.2128839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Medical and technological breakthroughs opened the way for ectogenesis as a way of carrying to full term foetuses that would otherwise have been lost to death. Subsequently, most Western feminists have found in ectogenesis a plausible tool for combating patriarchy. Hence, some Western feminist scholars have recently started questioning the essence of natural birth and whether it is even necessary at all, considering the bodily and psychological discomforts it entails for women. Using comparative analysis, this article engages prominent Western feminists’ arguments on ectogenesis in the light of what some African feminists maintain. This article concludes that the position of most Western feminists—that ectogenesis is potentially a tool for liberation from patriarchy— is not a position held among African feminists. This article explores the positions of some prominent African feminists on ectogenesis and its implications for motherhood. The article concludes that the scholars in these two orientations have divergent views on ectogenesis because of the ideologies underlying their strands of feminism.","PeriodicalId":256939,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Ectogenesis among Prominent African and Western Feminists\",\"authors\":\"B. Dasaolu, E. Ofuasia, Ibiyemi Sheriff Olasunkanmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18186874.2022.2128839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Medical and technological breakthroughs opened the way for ectogenesis as a way of carrying to full term foetuses that would otherwise have been lost to death. Subsequently, most Western feminists have found in ectogenesis a plausible tool for combating patriarchy. Hence, some Western feminist scholars have recently started questioning the essence of natural birth and whether it is even necessary at all, considering the bodily and psychological discomforts it entails for women. Using comparative analysis, this article engages prominent Western feminists’ arguments on ectogenesis in the light of what some African feminists maintain. This article concludes that the position of most Western feminists—that ectogenesis is potentially a tool for liberation from patriarchy— is not a position held among African feminists. This article explores the positions of some prominent African feminists on ectogenesis and its implications for motherhood. The article concludes that the scholars in these two orientations have divergent views on ectogenesis because of the ideologies underlying their strands of feminism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2022.2128839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2022.2128839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要医学和技术上的突破为体外受精开辟了道路,使其成为一种携带足月胎儿的方式,否则胎儿就会死亡。随后,大多数西方女权主义者在体外生殖中发现了一种对抗父权制的合理工具。因此,一些西方女权主义学者最近开始质疑自然分娩的本质,以及考虑到自然分娩给女性带来的身体和心理上的不适,自然分娩是否必要。本文运用比较分析的方法,结合一些非洲女性主义者的观点,对西方著名女性主义者关于生殖生殖的观点进行了梳理。这篇文章的结论是,大多数西方女权主义者的立场——体外生殖是从父权制中解放出来的潜在工具——并不是非洲女权主义者所持有的立场。本文探讨了一些杰出的非洲女权主义者的立场,在体外发生及其对母性的影响。文章的结论是,这两个流派的学者由于其女权主义思潮背后的意识形态而对异卵发生产生了不同的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of Ectogenesis among Prominent African and Western Feminists
Abstract Medical and technological breakthroughs opened the way for ectogenesis as a way of carrying to full term foetuses that would otherwise have been lost to death. Subsequently, most Western feminists have found in ectogenesis a plausible tool for combating patriarchy. Hence, some Western feminist scholars have recently started questioning the essence of natural birth and whether it is even necessary at all, considering the bodily and psychological discomforts it entails for women. Using comparative analysis, this article engages prominent Western feminists’ arguments on ectogenesis in the light of what some African feminists maintain. This article concludes that the position of most Western feminists—that ectogenesis is potentially a tool for liberation from patriarchy— is not a position held among African feminists. This article explores the positions of some prominent African feminists on ectogenesis and its implications for motherhood. The article concludes that the scholars in these two orientations have divergent views on ectogenesis because of the ideologies underlying their strands of feminism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信