油井修井作业的可持续动力与案例研究

Salman Saeed Muhammad, Mustansar Raza, Hossam A. Elmoneim, A. Yousuf, Rameez Anwar, S. Khokhar, Saqib Jah Temuri, Afnan Dar Ahmed, Kamil Shehzad
{"title":"油井修井作业的可持续动力与案例研究","authors":"Salman Saeed Muhammad, Mustansar Raza, Hossam A. Elmoneim, A. Yousuf, Rameez Anwar, S. Khokhar, Saqib Jah Temuri, Afnan Dar Ahmed, Kamil Shehzad","doi":"10.2118/211289-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Clean out using coiled tubing is the second largest application of coiled tubing after nitrogen kick-off. The advancements in coiled tubing metallurgies to intervene in complex wellbore geometries and precision of downhole simulators to predict on-site scenarios require more efficiencies from end tools that evolved from simple jetting tools to rotating jetting heads. The objective intended in the case studies performed in the Middle East and South Asia was to perform cleanout in scenarios where incumbent tools had failed in the past.\n The impact of jetting action in cleanout operations decreases with an increase in stand-off distance. It was confirmed from laboratory tests that a standoff of eight times the orifice diameter and fluid velocity of 200 ft/sec is required to remove moderate to hard deposits from wellbores. Conventional jetting tools have a standoff distance of more than 40 times and fluid velocities are below 200 ft/sec thus objectives are often compromised. A new type of fluidic oscillator was utilized in the case studies discussed in the paper. Unlike pulsating effects created by 1st generation of the fluidic oscillators, the SFO type oscillator had triple jetting action namely, Helix jetting, Pulses Jetting, and Cavitational jetting.\n The result of the clean-out with SFO technology was beyond expectations. It saved cost in all the case studies by an average of 35% if had been performed with incumbent technologies and increased production/injection from 30% - to 250% of the original value. Moreover, it reduced the operating times to two-thirds of conventional operations and increased the efficiency of treatment fluids which resulted in the reduction of waste of additives and extra additives to dispose of excess materials at wellsite.\n This is the first technology that used cavitational jetting in oilfield services and the first to use aforesaid jetting actions altogether in one tool. The technology adopted in the case studies doesn't have moving or rotating parts, thus eliminating the requirement to pull CT out of the hole for redressing and can perform long operations in one go. It doesn't depend on the centralization of the tool as the jetting effect is passed via kinetic energy through submersed fluids, thus can target deeper depth without limitations of the standoff. It allows a higher flow rate of liquid and gas, thus offering higher fluid velocities to perform an effective cleanout.","PeriodicalId":249690,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 01, 2022","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Sustainable Drive in Well Intervention Operations with Case Studies\",\"authors\":\"Salman Saeed Muhammad, Mustansar Raza, Hossam A. Elmoneim, A. Yousuf, Rameez Anwar, S. Khokhar, Saqib Jah Temuri, Afnan Dar Ahmed, Kamil Shehzad\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/211289-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Clean out using coiled tubing is the second largest application of coiled tubing after nitrogen kick-off. The advancements in coiled tubing metallurgies to intervene in complex wellbore geometries and precision of downhole simulators to predict on-site scenarios require more efficiencies from end tools that evolved from simple jetting tools to rotating jetting heads. The objective intended in the case studies performed in the Middle East and South Asia was to perform cleanout in scenarios where incumbent tools had failed in the past.\\n The impact of jetting action in cleanout operations decreases with an increase in stand-off distance. It was confirmed from laboratory tests that a standoff of eight times the orifice diameter and fluid velocity of 200 ft/sec is required to remove moderate to hard deposits from wellbores. Conventional jetting tools have a standoff distance of more than 40 times and fluid velocities are below 200 ft/sec thus objectives are often compromised. A new type of fluidic oscillator was utilized in the case studies discussed in the paper. Unlike pulsating effects created by 1st generation of the fluidic oscillators, the SFO type oscillator had triple jetting action namely, Helix jetting, Pulses Jetting, and Cavitational jetting.\\n The result of the clean-out with SFO technology was beyond expectations. It saved cost in all the case studies by an average of 35% if had been performed with incumbent technologies and increased production/injection from 30% - to 250% of the original value. Moreover, it reduced the operating times to two-thirds of conventional operations and increased the efficiency of treatment fluids which resulted in the reduction of waste of additives and extra additives to dispose of excess materials at wellsite.\\n This is the first technology that used cavitational jetting in oilfield services and the first to use aforesaid jetting actions altogether in one tool. The technology adopted in the case studies doesn't have moving or rotating parts, thus eliminating the requirement to pull CT out of the hole for redressing and can perform long operations in one go. It doesn't depend on the centralization of the tool as the jetting effect is passed via kinetic energy through submersed fluids, thus can target deeper depth without limitations of the standoff. It allows a higher flow rate of liquid and gas, thus offering higher fluid velocities to perform an effective cleanout.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, November 01, 2022\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, November 01, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/211289-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 01, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/211289-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

连续油管清井是连续油管除氮后的第二大应用。连续油管冶金技术的进步,可以干预复杂的井眼几何形状,井下模拟器的精度可以预测现场情况,这就要求端部工具从简单的喷射工具发展到旋转的喷射头,从而提高效率。在中东和南亚进行的案例研究的目的是在过去现有工具失败的情况下进行清洗。射流作用对洗井作业的影响随着离井距离的增加而减小。实验室测试证实,要清除井筒中的中硬沉积物,需要8倍孔径和200英尺/秒的流体速度。传统的喷射工具的距离超过40倍,流体速度低于200英尺/秒,因此目标经常受到损害。本文讨论了一种新型的流体振荡器。与第一代流体振荡器产生的脉动效应不同,SFO型振荡器具有三重射流作用,即螺旋射流、脉冲射流和空化射流。SFO技术的清井效果超出预期。在所有案例研究中,如果采用现有技术,平均可节省35%的成本,并将产量/注入量从原始价值的30%提高到250%。此外,它将作业时间减少到常规作业的三分之二,并提高了处理液的效率,从而减少了添加剂的浪费和在井场处理多余材料的额外添加剂。这是第一个在油田服务中使用空化喷射的技术,也是第一个在一个工具中同时使用上述喷射动作的技术。案例研究中采用的技术没有移动或旋转部件,因此无需将CT从井中取出进行修复,并且可以一次完成长时间的作业。它不依赖于工具的扶正,因为射流效果是通过动能通过淹没的流体传递的,因此可以针对更深的深度,而不受距离的限制。它允许更高的液体和气体流速,从而提供更高的流体速度来进行有效的清洗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Sustainable Drive in Well Intervention Operations with Case Studies
Clean out using coiled tubing is the second largest application of coiled tubing after nitrogen kick-off. The advancements in coiled tubing metallurgies to intervene in complex wellbore geometries and precision of downhole simulators to predict on-site scenarios require more efficiencies from end tools that evolved from simple jetting tools to rotating jetting heads. The objective intended in the case studies performed in the Middle East and South Asia was to perform cleanout in scenarios where incumbent tools had failed in the past. The impact of jetting action in cleanout operations decreases with an increase in stand-off distance. It was confirmed from laboratory tests that a standoff of eight times the orifice diameter and fluid velocity of 200 ft/sec is required to remove moderate to hard deposits from wellbores. Conventional jetting tools have a standoff distance of more than 40 times and fluid velocities are below 200 ft/sec thus objectives are often compromised. A new type of fluidic oscillator was utilized in the case studies discussed in the paper. Unlike pulsating effects created by 1st generation of the fluidic oscillators, the SFO type oscillator had triple jetting action namely, Helix jetting, Pulses Jetting, and Cavitational jetting. The result of the clean-out with SFO technology was beyond expectations. It saved cost in all the case studies by an average of 35% if had been performed with incumbent technologies and increased production/injection from 30% - to 250% of the original value. Moreover, it reduced the operating times to two-thirds of conventional operations and increased the efficiency of treatment fluids which resulted in the reduction of waste of additives and extra additives to dispose of excess materials at wellsite. This is the first technology that used cavitational jetting in oilfield services and the first to use aforesaid jetting actions altogether in one tool. The technology adopted in the case studies doesn't have moving or rotating parts, thus eliminating the requirement to pull CT out of the hole for redressing and can perform long operations in one go. It doesn't depend on the centralization of the tool as the jetting effect is passed via kinetic energy through submersed fluids, thus can target deeper depth without limitations of the standoff. It allows a higher flow rate of liquid and gas, thus offering higher fluid velocities to perform an effective cleanout.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信