从宋朝时期的《书画论》(《书画论》畵《书画论》)看仲唐Qiáo()对书画的理解

Eun-a Kim
{"title":"从宋朝时期的《书画论》(《书画论》畵《书画论》)看仲唐Qiáo()对书画的理解","authors":"Eun-a Kim","doi":"10.19077/tsoc.2023.42.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents why Zhèng Qiáo understood the relation between Seo and Hwa focusing on graphonomy to raise the theory of SeoHwaDongChul. Zhāng Yàn Yuǎn (張彦遠)’s thoughts of SeoHwaDongChe (書畵同體: Calligraphy and painting are same as each other) led to the theory of SeoHwaDongChul suggested by Zhèng Qiáo in the era of Song dynasty. Zhèng Qiáo drew the meaning of DongChul of Seo and Hwa from graphonomy to develop his thoughts. The essences of his theory of SeoHwaDongChul investigated for this article are: First, YukSeo (六書: the theory of explaining about the formation of Chinese characters in six types) puts priority onto SangHyeong (象形: a type of formation of Chinese characters). He thought that YukSeo could not help putting such priority to Hyeong (形: shape) as literacy and language should be based on SangHyeong, painting. Hwa delivers Thao, and Seo and Hwa come out of same root, which itself means SeoHwaDongChul. Second, his theory of SeoHwaDongChul is based on I-Ching. \nIn particular, his thoughts of such show that he tried to explain about the origin, usage and formation of characters through the logic of I-Ching. Third, Doh (圖: picture or figure) shows whether academic goal has been achieved. which means the role and weight of Doh are big and heavy enough to contribute to establishing structure of a country. That is, the theory of SeHwaByengYong (書畫竝用: Seo and Hwa should be used together) is more for practice than for any other else. Fourth, Zhèng Qiáo’s theory of SeoHwaDongChul and Zhāng Yàn Yuǎn’s theory of SeoHwaDongChe look accord and same with each other. Such Zhèng Qiáo’s understanding of SeoHwa raised the role value of SeoHwa to an academic position and emphasized practicality of SeoHwa in academic boundary. \nIn conclusion, Zhèng Qiáo’s understanding that SeoHwa helps academic achievement and contribution to establishing structure of a country is an argument that SeoHwa plays the role as same as that of YukJeok (六籍: six Confucian classics) at artistry level.","PeriodicalId":103412,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on Zhèng Qiáo (鄭樵)’s Understanding of SeoHwa (書畵: Calligraphy and Painting) based on his Theory of SeoHwaDongChul (書畵同出: Calligraphy and painting are beginning from same root) in the Era of Song Dynasty\",\"authors\":\"Eun-a Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.19077/tsoc.2023.42.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents why Zhèng Qiáo understood the relation between Seo and Hwa focusing on graphonomy to raise the theory of SeoHwaDongChul. Zhāng Yàn Yuǎn (張彦遠)’s thoughts of SeoHwaDongChe (書畵同體: Calligraphy and painting are same as each other) led to the theory of SeoHwaDongChul suggested by Zhèng Qiáo in the era of Song dynasty. Zhèng Qiáo drew the meaning of DongChul of Seo and Hwa from graphonomy to develop his thoughts. The essences of his theory of SeoHwaDongChul investigated for this article are: First, YukSeo (六書: the theory of explaining about the formation of Chinese characters in six types) puts priority onto SangHyeong (象形: a type of formation of Chinese characters). He thought that YukSeo could not help putting such priority to Hyeong (形: shape) as literacy and language should be based on SangHyeong, painting. Hwa delivers Thao, and Seo and Hwa come out of same root, which itself means SeoHwaDongChul. Second, his theory of SeoHwaDongChul is based on I-Ching. \\nIn particular, his thoughts of such show that he tried to explain about the origin, usage and formation of characters through the logic of I-Ching. Third, Doh (圖: picture or figure) shows whether academic goal has been achieved. which means the role and weight of Doh are big and heavy enough to contribute to establishing structure of a country. That is, the theory of SeHwaByengYong (書畫竝用: Seo and Hwa should be used together) is more for practice than for any other else. Fourth, Zhèng Qiáo’s theory of SeoHwaDongChul and Zhāng Yàn Yuǎn’s theory of SeoHwaDongChe look accord and same with each other. Such Zhèng Qiáo’s understanding of SeoHwa raised the role value of SeoHwa to an academic position and emphasized practicality of SeoHwa in academic boundary. \\nIn conclusion, Zhèng Qiáo’s understanding that SeoHwa helps academic achievement and contribution to establishing structure of a country is an argument that SeoHwa plays the role as same as that of YukJeok (六籍: six Confucian classics) at artistry level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Society of Calligraphy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Society of Calligraphy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2023.42.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Society of Calligraphy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19077/tsoc.2023.42.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以书面学为中心,介绍了zh Qiáo理解徐和华关系的原因,并提出了徐和东哲理论。Zhāng Yàn Yuǎn(。zh Qiáo从书法学中汲取了徐和东哲的意义,发展了自己的思想。本文所考察的他的《西化东哲》理论的精髓是:第一,《六字论》以《六字论》为主,《六字论》以《六字论》为主。他认为,由于文化和语言应该以绘画为基础,吕徐不能不把“形”放在首位。“Hwa”传递“Thao”,“Seo”和“Hwa”出自同一个词根,这本身就是“SeoHwaDongChul”的意思。第二,他的《西化东哲》理论是以《易经》为基础。特别是,他的这一思想表明,他试图通过易经的逻辑来解释文字的起源、使用和形成。第三,Doh(图片或数字)显示学术目标是否已经实现。这意味着Doh的作用和分量足够大,足以为建立一个国家的结构做出贡献。也就是说,SeHwaByengYong的理论(Seo和Hwa应该一起使用)更多的是用于实践,而不是其他任何理论。第四,朱戎Qiáo的“西化东哲”理论与Zhāng Yàn Yuǎn的“西化东哲”理论具有一致性。这样的zh Qiáo对SeoHwa的理解将SeoHwa的角色价值提升到了学术的高度,强调了SeoHwa在学术边界上的实用性。综上所述,zh Qiáo认为《西化》有助于学术成就,有助于国家结构的建立,这是一种认为《西化》在艺术层面上与《六经》一样的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on Zhèng Qiáo (鄭樵)’s Understanding of SeoHwa (書畵: Calligraphy and Painting) based on his Theory of SeoHwaDongChul (書畵同出: Calligraphy and painting are beginning from same root) in the Era of Song Dynasty
This article presents why Zhèng Qiáo understood the relation between Seo and Hwa focusing on graphonomy to raise the theory of SeoHwaDongChul. Zhāng Yàn Yuǎn (張彦遠)’s thoughts of SeoHwaDongChe (書畵同體: Calligraphy and painting are same as each other) led to the theory of SeoHwaDongChul suggested by Zhèng Qiáo in the era of Song dynasty. Zhèng Qiáo drew the meaning of DongChul of Seo and Hwa from graphonomy to develop his thoughts. The essences of his theory of SeoHwaDongChul investigated for this article are: First, YukSeo (六書: the theory of explaining about the formation of Chinese characters in six types) puts priority onto SangHyeong (象形: a type of formation of Chinese characters). He thought that YukSeo could not help putting such priority to Hyeong (形: shape) as literacy and language should be based on SangHyeong, painting. Hwa delivers Thao, and Seo and Hwa come out of same root, which itself means SeoHwaDongChul. Second, his theory of SeoHwaDongChul is based on I-Ching. In particular, his thoughts of such show that he tried to explain about the origin, usage and formation of characters through the logic of I-Ching. Third, Doh (圖: picture or figure) shows whether academic goal has been achieved. which means the role and weight of Doh are big and heavy enough to contribute to establishing structure of a country. That is, the theory of SeHwaByengYong (書畫竝用: Seo and Hwa should be used together) is more for practice than for any other else. Fourth, Zhèng Qiáo’s theory of SeoHwaDongChul and Zhāng Yàn Yuǎn’s theory of SeoHwaDongChe look accord and same with each other. Such Zhèng Qiáo’s understanding of SeoHwa raised the role value of SeoHwa to an academic position and emphasized practicality of SeoHwa in academic boundary. In conclusion, Zhèng Qiáo’s understanding that SeoHwa helps academic achievement and contribution to establishing structure of a country is an argument that SeoHwa plays the role as same as that of YukJeok (六籍: six Confucian classics) at artistry level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信