交通安全文化十项原则

N. Ward, Jay Otto, Kari Finley
{"title":"交通安全文化十项原则","authors":"N. Ward, Jay Otto, Kari Finley","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78714-617-420191004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nOur commitment to the goal of zero traffic fatalities and serious injuries requires consideration of innovative traffic safety thinking. There is growing recognition that this goal requires a change in our culture as it relates to traffic safety (traffic safety culture). And yet, there is no consensus about a definition for traffic safety culture, no explicit theory-based model to predict the effect of traffic safety culture, and no practical guidance for applying these models to develop effective culture-based strategies. This chapter seeks to address these omissions from both an academic and practitioner perspective. \n \nThis chapter proposes a standard definition of traffic safety culture based on a model that integrates relevant theories of willful and intentional behavior. Importantly, a set of 10 principles are identified that provide the context and foundation from which the definition and model are derived. An understanding of these principles provides the logic and purpose for developing strategies that can transform traffic safety culture: \n \n(1) \nTraffic crashes are a significant public health concern. \n \n(2) \nMost traffic crashes are caused by human behavior, not the roadway, vehicle, or environment (e.g., weather). \n \n(3) \nHuman behavior is influenced by beliefs. \n \n(4) \nBeliefs develop based on experience (actual and vicarious) and socialization. \n \n(5) \nSocialization is the process whereby an individual develops beliefs which align with the culture of a group with which the individual identifies (social identity). \n \n(6) \nIndividuals can form an identity with many different groups in their social environment, each with a different degree of bonding. \n \n(7) \nA stronger bond results in greater conformity and motivation to abide with the group culture. \n \n(8) \nThe shared beliefs of a group that affect behaviors related to traffic safety are called traffic safety culture. \n \n(9) \nThe traffic safety culture of a group emerges from actions taken by stakeholders across the social ecology. \n \n(10) \nTraffic safety culture strategies increase actions by stakeholders across the social ecology to improve traffic safety culture among various groups. \n \n \n \nFor the academic, these principles can also serve as hypotheses that can be explored to expand our knowledge about traffic safety culture. For the practitioner, these principles represent the basic logic and impetus for transforming traffic safety culture. By effectively communicating these principles and their connecting logic, we can express the importance of traffic safety culture and the need for supporting resources with other stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":438575,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Safety Culture","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten Principles of Traffic Safety Culture\",\"authors\":\"N. Ward, Jay Otto, Kari Finley\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/978-1-78714-617-420191004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nOur commitment to the goal of zero traffic fatalities and serious injuries requires consideration of innovative traffic safety thinking. There is growing recognition that this goal requires a change in our culture as it relates to traffic safety (traffic safety culture). And yet, there is no consensus about a definition for traffic safety culture, no explicit theory-based model to predict the effect of traffic safety culture, and no practical guidance for applying these models to develop effective culture-based strategies. This chapter seeks to address these omissions from both an academic and practitioner perspective. \\n \\nThis chapter proposes a standard definition of traffic safety culture based on a model that integrates relevant theories of willful and intentional behavior. Importantly, a set of 10 principles are identified that provide the context and foundation from which the definition and model are derived. An understanding of these principles provides the logic and purpose for developing strategies that can transform traffic safety culture: \\n \\n(1) \\nTraffic crashes are a significant public health concern. \\n \\n(2) \\nMost traffic crashes are caused by human behavior, not the roadway, vehicle, or environment (e.g., weather). \\n \\n(3) \\nHuman behavior is influenced by beliefs. \\n \\n(4) \\nBeliefs develop based on experience (actual and vicarious) and socialization. \\n \\n(5) \\nSocialization is the process whereby an individual develops beliefs which align with the culture of a group with which the individual identifies (social identity). \\n \\n(6) \\nIndividuals can form an identity with many different groups in their social environment, each with a different degree of bonding. \\n \\n(7) \\nA stronger bond results in greater conformity and motivation to abide with the group culture. \\n \\n(8) \\nThe shared beliefs of a group that affect behaviors related to traffic safety are called traffic safety culture. \\n \\n(9) \\nThe traffic safety culture of a group emerges from actions taken by stakeholders across the social ecology. \\n \\n(10) \\nTraffic safety culture strategies increase actions by stakeholders across the social ecology to improve traffic safety culture among various groups. \\n \\n \\n \\nFor the academic, these principles can also serve as hypotheses that can be explored to expand our knowledge about traffic safety culture. For the practitioner, these principles represent the basic logic and impetus for transforming traffic safety culture. By effectively communicating these principles and their connecting logic, we can express the importance of traffic safety culture and the need for supporting resources with other stakeholders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Safety Culture\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Safety Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-617-420191004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Safety Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-617-420191004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们对零交通死亡和严重伤害目标的承诺需要考虑创新的交通安全思维。越来越多的人认识到,这一目标需要改变我们的文化,因为它涉及到交通安全(交通安全文化)。然而,对交通安全文化的定义尚未达成共识,没有明确的理论模型来预测交通安全文化的效果,也没有实用的指导来应用这些模型来制定有效的基于文化的策略。本章试图从学术和实践的角度来解决这些遗漏。本章基于一个整合了故意行为和故意行为相关理论的模型,提出了交通安全文化的标准定义。重要的是,确定了一组10条原则,这些原则提供了定义和模型派生的上下文和基础。对这些原则的理解为制定能够改变交通安全文化的战略提供了逻辑和目的:(1)交通事故是一个重大的公共卫生问题。(2)大多数交通事故是由人类行为引起的,而不是道路、车辆或环境(如天气)。(3)人的行为受到信念的影响。(4)信念的发展是基于经验(实际的和替代的)和社会化。(5)社会化是个体发展与个体认同(社会认同)的群体文化相一致的信念的过程。(6)个体可以在其社会环境中与许多不同的群体形成身份认同,每个群体都有不同程度的联系。(7)更强的联系导致更大的一致性和遵守群体文化的动机。(8)影响交通安全相关行为的群体的共同信念被称为交通安全文化。(9)群体的交通安全文化产生于整个社会生态中利益相关者的行动。(10)交通安全文化战略增加了整个社会生态中利益相关者的行动,以改善不同群体的交通安全文化。对于学术界来说,这些原则也可以作为假设来探索,以扩大我们对交通安全文化的认识。对于实践者来说,这些原则代表了交通安全文化转型的基本逻辑和动力。通过有效地沟通这些原则及其相互关联的逻辑,我们可以表达交通安全文化的重要性,以及与其他利益相关者一起提供支持资源的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ten Principles of Traffic Safety Culture
Abstract Our commitment to the goal of zero traffic fatalities and serious injuries requires consideration of innovative traffic safety thinking. There is growing recognition that this goal requires a change in our culture as it relates to traffic safety (traffic safety culture). And yet, there is no consensus about a definition for traffic safety culture, no explicit theory-based model to predict the effect of traffic safety culture, and no practical guidance for applying these models to develop effective culture-based strategies. This chapter seeks to address these omissions from both an academic and practitioner perspective. This chapter proposes a standard definition of traffic safety culture based on a model that integrates relevant theories of willful and intentional behavior. Importantly, a set of 10 principles are identified that provide the context and foundation from which the definition and model are derived. An understanding of these principles provides the logic and purpose for developing strategies that can transform traffic safety culture: (1) Traffic crashes are a significant public health concern. (2) Most traffic crashes are caused by human behavior, not the roadway, vehicle, or environment (e.g., weather). (3) Human behavior is influenced by beliefs. (4) Beliefs develop based on experience (actual and vicarious) and socialization. (5) Socialization is the process whereby an individual develops beliefs which align with the culture of a group with which the individual identifies (social identity). (6) Individuals can form an identity with many different groups in their social environment, each with a different degree of bonding. (7) A stronger bond results in greater conformity and motivation to abide with the group culture. (8) The shared beliefs of a group that affect behaviors related to traffic safety are called traffic safety culture. (9) The traffic safety culture of a group emerges from actions taken by stakeholders across the social ecology. (10) Traffic safety culture strategies increase actions by stakeholders across the social ecology to improve traffic safety culture among various groups. For the academic, these principles can also serve as hypotheses that can be explored to expand our knowledge about traffic safety culture. For the practitioner, these principles represent the basic logic and impetus for transforming traffic safety culture. By effectively communicating these principles and their connecting logic, we can express the importance of traffic safety culture and the need for supporting resources with other stakeholders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信