一种比较和验证大信号测量系统的鲁棒方法

T. Williams, O. Mojón, S. Woodington, J. Lees, M. Barciela, J. Benedikt, P. Tasker
{"title":"一种比较和验证大信号测量系统的鲁棒方法","authors":"T. Williams, O. Mojón, S. Woodington, J. Lees, M. Barciela, J. Benedikt, P. Tasker","doi":"10.1109/MWSYM.2008.4633152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As time-domain RF measurement tools gain recognition and acceptance, it becomes increasingly important to identify and compare the different systems being used, and to quantify any differences observed. In this paper, a robust validation approach is identified and used to compare a number of completely different large-signal measurement systems. Unlike a previous ‘round-robin’ exercise, the solution does not require an accurately modeled non-linear reference component to account for system impedance variations when comparing results, which clearly introduces additional complexity and the possibility of errors. Instead, active loadpull, coupled with a common passive source network is used to present a consistent impedance environment to a device under test. After employing this method, large signal data from two completely different measurement architectures employing different instruments and calibration procedures showed excellent agreement. This approach has proved useful in the validation and comparison of a number of large signal measurement and could be used to increase confidence in such systems.","PeriodicalId":273767,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A robust approach for comparison and validation of large signal measurement systems\",\"authors\":\"T. Williams, O. Mojón, S. Woodington, J. Lees, M. Barciela, J. Benedikt, P. Tasker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MWSYM.2008.4633152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As time-domain RF measurement tools gain recognition and acceptance, it becomes increasingly important to identify and compare the different systems being used, and to quantify any differences observed. In this paper, a robust validation approach is identified and used to compare a number of completely different large-signal measurement systems. Unlike a previous ‘round-robin’ exercise, the solution does not require an accurately modeled non-linear reference component to account for system impedance variations when comparing results, which clearly introduces additional complexity and the possibility of errors. Instead, active loadpull, coupled with a common passive source network is used to present a consistent impedance environment to a device under test. After employing this method, large signal data from two completely different measurement architectures employing different instruments and calibration procedures showed excellent agreement. This approach has proved useful in the validation and comparison of a number of large signal measurement and could be used to increase confidence in such systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2008.4633152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2008.4633152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

随着时域射频测量工具获得认可和接受,识别和比较正在使用的不同系统以及量化观察到的任何差异变得越来越重要。本文确定了一种鲁棒验证方法,并将其用于比较许多完全不同的大信号测量系统。与之前的“循环”练习不同,该解决方案在比较结果时不需要精确建模的非线性参考组件来考虑系统阻抗变化,这显然会引入额外的复杂性和误差的可能性。相反,主动负载拉,加上一个共同的无源源网络被用来提供一个一致的阻抗环境的测试设备。采用该方法后,采用不同仪器和校准程序的两种完全不同的测量架构的大信号数据显示出极好的一致性。这种方法已被证明在许多大信号测量的验证和比较中是有用的,并可用于增加对此类系统的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A robust approach for comparison and validation of large signal measurement systems
As time-domain RF measurement tools gain recognition and acceptance, it becomes increasingly important to identify and compare the different systems being used, and to quantify any differences observed. In this paper, a robust validation approach is identified and used to compare a number of completely different large-signal measurement systems. Unlike a previous ‘round-robin’ exercise, the solution does not require an accurately modeled non-linear reference component to account for system impedance variations when comparing results, which clearly introduces additional complexity and the possibility of errors. Instead, active loadpull, coupled with a common passive source network is used to present a consistent impedance environment to a device under test. After employing this method, large signal data from two completely different measurement architectures employing different instruments and calibration procedures showed excellent agreement. This approach has proved useful in the validation and comparison of a number of large signal measurement and could be used to increase confidence in such systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信