不动产诉讼中权属争议案件的事实取得日期——以最高法院2021年5月27日判决为中心,2017DU56032

yong-won kil, M. Choi
{"title":"不动产诉讼中权属争议案件的事实取得日期——以最高法院2021年5月27日判决为中心,2017DU56032","authors":"yong-won kil, M. Choi","doi":"10.55029/kabl.2022.43.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tax law concerned is basically a relationship in which the state demands taxpayers a monetary benefit called tax. For this reason, the judicial principle works strongly. Judicial acts and transactions and the interpretation and application of tax laws are closely related. However, after the tax legal relations are established and finalized, the taxation agency's valuation right is reserved, especially in the finalization, so the taxation authority has the right to self-execute in order to secure the finalized tax claims. It grants privileges such as monitoring and supervision rights. In this respect, there is a debate to clarify the degree of intervention of judicial provisions in tax law relations. \nActual tax law may use the same term but interpret and apply it with different standards from civil law. Typical examples are \"acquisition\" under the Local Tax Law and \"acquisition\" under the Civil Code. The issue on this subject is also based on this. \nThe object of acquisition under the acquisition tax is the ownership of the taxable property. Therefore, in the judiciary, in order to become a property subject to acquisition tax, it is necessary to have requirements such as registration / registration and delivery, but the Local Tax Law that stipulates the taxation requirements for acquisition tax is based on Article 186 of the Civil Code. In addition to the acquisition of ownership, de facto acquisition is also included in the subject of acquisition tax. The \"de facto acquisition\" of real estate means that even if the real estate is not registered under the Civil Code, in the case of buying and selling, the purchaser can acquire the ownership and use and profit the real estate at any time after the payment of the price etc. is completed. \nRecently, the Supreme Court has decided whether or not the acquisition time will be effectively changed if the ownership is disputed in a real estate-related lawsuit. In conclusion, after the acquisition was virtually made by the Local Tax Law and the acquisition time came, I saw that the acquisition time would not be changed when the relevant proceeding was finalized just because a proceeding was filed to dispute the acquisition. Considering the purpose of introducing the concept of acquisition in the Local Tax Law, I think it is a valid judgment.","PeriodicalId":399431,"journal":{"name":"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De facto Acquisition Date in Case of Disputed Ownership in Real Estate Proceedings: Focused on Supreme Court’s Judgment of May 27, 2021, 2017DU56032\",\"authors\":\"yong-won kil, M. Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.55029/kabl.2022.43.59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tax law concerned is basically a relationship in which the state demands taxpayers a monetary benefit called tax. For this reason, the judicial principle works strongly. Judicial acts and transactions and the interpretation and application of tax laws are closely related. However, after the tax legal relations are established and finalized, the taxation agency's valuation right is reserved, especially in the finalization, so the taxation authority has the right to self-execute in order to secure the finalized tax claims. It grants privileges such as monitoring and supervision rights. In this respect, there is a debate to clarify the degree of intervention of judicial provisions in tax law relations. \\nActual tax law may use the same term but interpret and apply it with different standards from civil law. Typical examples are \\\"acquisition\\\" under the Local Tax Law and \\\"acquisition\\\" under the Civil Code. The issue on this subject is also based on this. \\nThe object of acquisition under the acquisition tax is the ownership of the taxable property. Therefore, in the judiciary, in order to become a property subject to acquisition tax, it is necessary to have requirements such as registration / registration and delivery, but the Local Tax Law that stipulates the taxation requirements for acquisition tax is based on Article 186 of the Civil Code. In addition to the acquisition of ownership, de facto acquisition is also included in the subject of acquisition tax. The \\\"de facto acquisition\\\" of real estate means that even if the real estate is not registered under the Civil Code, in the case of buying and selling, the purchaser can acquire the ownership and use and profit the real estate at any time after the payment of the price etc. is completed. \\nRecently, the Supreme Court has decided whether or not the acquisition time will be effectively changed if the ownership is disputed in a real estate-related lawsuit. In conclusion, after the acquisition was virtually made by the Local Tax Law and the acquisition time came, I saw that the acquisition time would not be changed when the relevant proceeding was finalized just because a proceeding was filed to dispute the acquisition. Considering the purpose of introducing the concept of acquisition in the Local Tax Law, I think it is a valid judgment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55029/kabl.2022.43.59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55029/kabl.2022.43.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

税法所涉及的基本上是一种关系,在这种关系中,国家要求纳税人获得称为税收的货币利益。因此,司法原则发挥了强大的作用。司法行为和交易与税法的解释和适用是密切相关的。但是,在税收法律关系确立并定案后,税务机关的估价权被保留,特别是在定案过程中,因此税务机关有权自行执行,以确保最终的税收债权。它授予监视和监督权等特权。在这方面,司法规定对税收法律关系的干预程度存在争议。实际税法可能使用相同的术语,但对其的解释和适用标准与民法不同。典型的例子是《地方税法》中的“收购”和《民法典》中的“收购”。关于这个问题的问题也是基于此。取得税的取得对象是应税财产的所有权。因此,在司法上,要成为征收所得税的财产,必须具备登记/登记和交付等条件,但规定征收所得税的课税条件的《地方税法》是以民法第186条为基础的。除取得所有权外,事实上取得也包括在购并税的征收对象中。不动产的“事实取得”是指即使该不动产未进行民法典登记,在买卖的情况下,买受人在支付价款等完成后,可以随时取得不动产的所有权和使用权并从中获利。最近,大法院对在房地产相关诉讼中发生所有权争议时是否有效改变收购时间的问题进行了判决。综上所述,在根据《地方税法》进行了实质上的收购,并且收购时间到了之后,我看到在相关程序完成后,不会因为对收购提出异议而改变收购时间。考虑到《地方税法》引入收购概念的目的,我认为这是一个有效的判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
De facto Acquisition Date in Case of Disputed Ownership in Real Estate Proceedings: Focused on Supreme Court’s Judgment of May 27, 2021, 2017DU56032
Tax law concerned is basically a relationship in which the state demands taxpayers a monetary benefit called tax. For this reason, the judicial principle works strongly. Judicial acts and transactions and the interpretation and application of tax laws are closely related. However, after the tax legal relations are established and finalized, the taxation agency's valuation right is reserved, especially in the finalization, so the taxation authority has the right to self-execute in order to secure the finalized tax claims. It grants privileges such as monitoring and supervision rights. In this respect, there is a debate to clarify the degree of intervention of judicial provisions in tax law relations. Actual tax law may use the same term but interpret and apply it with different standards from civil law. Typical examples are "acquisition" under the Local Tax Law and "acquisition" under the Civil Code. The issue on this subject is also based on this. The object of acquisition under the acquisition tax is the ownership of the taxable property. Therefore, in the judiciary, in order to become a property subject to acquisition tax, it is necessary to have requirements such as registration / registration and delivery, but the Local Tax Law that stipulates the taxation requirements for acquisition tax is based on Article 186 of the Civil Code. In addition to the acquisition of ownership, de facto acquisition is also included in the subject of acquisition tax. The "de facto acquisition" of real estate means that even if the real estate is not registered under the Civil Code, in the case of buying and selling, the purchaser can acquire the ownership and use and profit the real estate at any time after the payment of the price etc. is completed. Recently, the Supreme Court has decided whether or not the acquisition time will be effectively changed if the ownership is disputed in a real estate-related lawsuit. In conclusion, after the acquisition was virtually made by the Local Tax Law and the acquisition time came, I saw that the acquisition time would not be changed when the relevant proceeding was finalized just because a proceeding was filed to dispute the acquisition. Considering the purpose of introducing the concept of acquisition in the Local Tax Law, I think it is a valid judgment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信