{"title":"北斗系统实时精确点定位精度分析与评价","authors":"Xiangyang Han, Wanlin Zhao, Ya Cui, Yijin Chen","doi":"10.1109/ICMAE56000.2022.9852905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to test the real-time precise point positioning (PPP) performance of the BDS under different user needs, this paper presents single-frequency nondifference noncombinatorial model, dual-frequency ionosphere-free combined model, triple-frequency ionosphere-free combined model, and evaluates the static positioning performance of PPP. The experimental results show that the positioning accuracy of single-frequency PPP in the horizontal direction is better than 1 cm and positioning accuracy in the elevation direction is better than 10 cm; compared with single-frequency PPP, the positioning performance of dual-frequency PPP is improved by 64.1% in the N direction, 76.8% in the E direction, and 87% in the U direction; and the triple-frequency PPP is more robust in coping with mutations in observation conditions, and the positioning accuracy in N, E, and U directions is 66.3%, 85.7%, and 84.4% higher than that of single-frequency PPP, respectively.","PeriodicalId":198002,"journal":{"name":"2022 13th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precision Analysis and Evaluation of BDS Real-time Precise Point Positioning\",\"authors\":\"Xiangyang Han, Wanlin Zhao, Ya Cui, Yijin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMAE56000.2022.9852905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to test the real-time precise point positioning (PPP) performance of the BDS under different user needs, this paper presents single-frequency nondifference noncombinatorial model, dual-frequency ionosphere-free combined model, triple-frequency ionosphere-free combined model, and evaluates the static positioning performance of PPP. The experimental results show that the positioning accuracy of single-frequency PPP in the horizontal direction is better than 1 cm and positioning accuracy in the elevation direction is better than 10 cm; compared with single-frequency PPP, the positioning performance of dual-frequency PPP is improved by 64.1% in the N direction, 76.8% in the E direction, and 87% in the U direction; and the triple-frequency PPP is more robust in coping with mutations in observation conditions, and the positioning accuracy in N, E, and U directions is 66.3%, 85.7%, and 84.4% higher than that of single-frequency PPP, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 13th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 13th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMAE56000.2022.9852905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 13th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMAE56000.2022.9852905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Precision Analysis and Evaluation of BDS Real-time Precise Point Positioning
In order to test the real-time precise point positioning (PPP) performance of the BDS under different user needs, this paper presents single-frequency nondifference noncombinatorial model, dual-frequency ionosphere-free combined model, triple-frequency ionosphere-free combined model, and evaluates the static positioning performance of PPP. The experimental results show that the positioning accuracy of single-frequency PPP in the horizontal direction is better than 1 cm and positioning accuracy in the elevation direction is better than 10 cm; compared with single-frequency PPP, the positioning performance of dual-frequency PPP is improved by 64.1% in the N direction, 76.8% in the E direction, and 87% in the U direction; and the triple-frequency PPP is more robust in coping with mutations in observation conditions, and the positioning accuracy in N, E, and U directions is 66.3%, 85.7%, and 84.4% higher than that of single-frequency PPP, respectively.