不同抗菌剂对脆弱拟杆菌群的体外敏感性与体内疗效比较。

I Brook
{"title":"不同抗菌剂对脆弱拟杆菌群的体外敏感性与体内疗效比较。","authors":"I Brook","doi":"10.1093/clinids/13.6.1170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vitro susceptibility testing is only one step in the evaluation of the potential efficacy of antimicrobial agents against the Bacteroides fragilis group. An assessment of in vivo efficacy, with a consideration of the factors that can best be studied in an infected host, is also an integral part of this process. Abscess models in rodents have been used to correlate in vitro activity with in vivo efficacy against this group of microorganisms. For metronidazole, clindamycin, moxalactam, and cefoxitin, the correlation was strong; for chloramphenicol and carbenicillin, it was not. In vivo studies of mixed infection with the B. fragilis group and Escherichia coli showed that cefoxitin and imipenem were effective; in contrast, cefotetan was not effective against resistant strains. Only strains susceptible to ceftizoxime in the agar dilution test were also affected by this drug in vivo. The so-called inoculum effect noted with ceftizoxime may explain this finding. In vivo elimination of encapsulated organisms of the B. fragilis group was found to be more difficult than elimination of unencapsulated isolates. The beta-lactamase produced by Bacteroides species can protect the enzyme-producing organism as well as its partners in mixed infections from the effects of beta-lactam antibiotics. These data illustrate the complexity and difficulties encountered when in vitro activity is correlated with in vivo efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21184,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of infectious diseases","volume":"13 6","pages":"1170-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/clinids/13.6.1170","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro susceptibility vs. in vivo efficacy of various antimicrobial agents against the Bacteroides fragilis group.\",\"authors\":\"I Brook\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinids/13.6.1170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In vitro susceptibility testing is only one step in the evaluation of the potential efficacy of antimicrobial agents against the Bacteroides fragilis group. An assessment of in vivo efficacy, with a consideration of the factors that can best be studied in an infected host, is also an integral part of this process. Abscess models in rodents have been used to correlate in vitro activity with in vivo efficacy against this group of microorganisms. For metronidazole, clindamycin, moxalactam, and cefoxitin, the correlation was strong; for chloramphenicol and carbenicillin, it was not. In vivo studies of mixed infection with the B. fragilis group and Escherichia coli showed that cefoxitin and imipenem were effective; in contrast, cefotetan was not effective against resistant strains. Only strains susceptible to ceftizoxime in the agar dilution test were also affected by this drug in vivo. The so-called inoculum effect noted with ceftizoxime may explain this finding. In vivo elimination of encapsulated organisms of the B. fragilis group was found to be more difficult than elimination of unencapsulated isolates. The beta-lactamase produced by Bacteroides species can protect the enzyme-producing organism as well as its partners in mixed infections from the effects of beta-lactam antibiotics. These data illustrate the complexity and difficulties encountered when in vitro activity is correlated with in vivo efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews of infectious diseases\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"1170-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/clinids/13.6.1170\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews of infectious diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/13.6.1170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/13.6.1170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

体外药敏试验只是评价抗菌药物对脆弱拟杆菌群潜在疗效的一个步骤。考虑到在受感染宿主中最能研究的因素,对体内疗效的评估也是这一过程的一个组成部分。啮齿类动物的脓肿模型已用于将体外活性与体内对这组微生物的功效联系起来。甲硝唑、克林霉素、莫西坦和头孢西丁相关性强;而氯霉素和卡比西林则不然。体内脆弱杆菌群和大肠杆菌混合感染的研究表明,头孢西丁和亚胺培南是有效的;相反,头孢替坦对耐药菌株无效。只有琼脂稀释试验中对头孢替肟敏感的菌株在体内也受到该药的影响。头孢替肟的接种效应可以解释这一发现。在体内消灭被包裹的脆弱芽孢杆菌群比消灭未被包裹的分离株更困难。在混合感染中,拟杆菌类产生的-内酰胺酶可以保护产酶生物及其伙伴免受-内酰胺抗生素的影响。这些数据说明了当体外活性与体内功效相关联时所遇到的复杂性和困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vitro susceptibility vs. in vivo efficacy of various antimicrobial agents against the Bacteroides fragilis group.

In vitro susceptibility testing is only one step in the evaluation of the potential efficacy of antimicrobial agents against the Bacteroides fragilis group. An assessment of in vivo efficacy, with a consideration of the factors that can best be studied in an infected host, is also an integral part of this process. Abscess models in rodents have been used to correlate in vitro activity with in vivo efficacy against this group of microorganisms. For metronidazole, clindamycin, moxalactam, and cefoxitin, the correlation was strong; for chloramphenicol and carbenicillin, it was not. In vivo studies of mixed infection with the B. fragilis group and Escherichia coli showed that cefoxitin and imipenem were effective; in contrast, cefotetan was not effective against resistant strains. Only strains susceptible to ceftizoxime in the agar dilution test were also affected by this drug in vivo. The so-called inoculum effect noted with ceftizoxime may explain this finding. In vivo elimination of encapsulated organisms of the B. fragilis group was found to be more difficult than elimination of unencapsulated isolates. The beta-lactamase produced by Bacteroides species can protect the enzyme-producing organism as well as its partners in mixed infections from the effects of beta-lactam antibiotics. These data illustrate the complexity and difficulties encountered when in vitro activity is correlated with in vivo efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信