电子学习标准和学习分析。是否可以通过使用标准数据模型来改进数据收集?

Á. Blanco, Ángel Serrano, M. Freire, I. Martínez-Ortiz, Baltasar Fernandez-Manjon
{"title":"电子学习标准和学习分析。是否可以通过使用标准数据模型来改进数据收集?","authors":"Á. Blanco, Ángel Serrano, M. Freire, I. Martínez-Ortiz, Baltasar Fernandez-Manjon","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON.2013.6530268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Learning Analytics (LA) discipline analyzes educational data obtained from student interaction with online resources. Most of the data is collected from Learning Management Systems deployed at established educational institutions. In addition, other learning platforms, most notably Massive Open Online Courses such as Udacity and Coursera or other educational initiatives such as Khan Academy, generate large amounts of data. However, there is no generally agreedupon data model for student interactions. Thus, analysis tools must be tailored to each system's particular data structure, reducing their interoperability and increasing development costs. Some e-Learning standards designed for content interoperability include data models for gathering student performance information. In this paper, we describe how well-known LA tools collect data, which we link to how two e-Learning standards - IEEE Standard for Learning Technology and Experience API - define their data models. From this analysis, we identify the advantages of using these e-Learning standards from the point of view of Learning Analytics.","PeriodicalId":297233,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"91","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E-Learning standards and learning analytics. Can data collection be improved by using standard data models?\",\"authors\":\"Á. Blanco, Ángel Serrano, M. Freire, I. Martínez-Ortiz, Baltasar Fernandez-Manjon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDUCON.2013.6530268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Learning Analytics (LA) discipline analyzes educational data obtained from student interaction with online resources. Most of the data is collected from Learning Management Systems deployed at established educational institutions. In addition, other learning platforms, most notably Massive Open Online Courses such as Udacity and Coursera or other educational initiatives such as Khan Academy, generate large amounts of data. However, there is no generally agreedupon data model for student interactions. Thus, analysis tools must be tailored to each system's particular data structure, reducing their interoperability and increasing development costs. Some e-Learning standards designed for content interoperability include data models for gathering student performance information. In this paper, we describe how well-known LA tools collect data, which we link to how two e-Learning standards - IEEE Standard for Learning Technology and Experience API - define their data models. From this analysis, we identify the advantages of using these e-Learning standards from the point of view of Learning Analytics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"91\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2013.6530268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2013.6530268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 91

摘要

学习分析(LA)学科分析从学生与在线资源的互动中获得的教育数据。大多数数据是从已建立的教育机构部署的学习管理系统收集的。此外,其他学习平台,最著名的是大规模开放在线课程,如Udacity和Coursera,或其他教育项目,如可汗学院,产生了大量的数据。然而,对于学生之间的互动,目前还没有一个普遍认可的数据模型。因此,分析工具必须针对每个系统的特定数据结构进行定制,从而降低了它们的互操作性并增加了开发成本。一些为内容互操作性设计的电子学习标准包括用于收集学生表现信息的数据模型。在本文中,我们描述了知名的LA工具如何收集数据,并将其与两个电子学习标准(IEEE学习技术标准和体验API标准)如何定义其数据模型联系起来。从这个分析中,我们从学习分析的角度确定了使用这些电子学习标准的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
E-Learning standards and learning analytics. Can data collection be improved by using standard data models?
The Learning Analytics (LA) discipline analyzes educational data obtained from student interaction with online resources. Most of the data is collected from Learning Management Systems deployed at established educational institutions. In addition, other learning platforms, most notably Massive Open Online Courses such as Udacity and Coursera or other educational initiatives such as Khan Academy, generate large amounts of data. However, there is no generally agreedupon data model for student interactions. Thus, analysis tools must be tailored to each system's particular data structure, reducing their interoperability and increasing development costs. Some e-Learning standards designed for content interoperability include data models for gathering student performance information. In this paper, we describe how well-known LA tools collect data, which we link to how two e-Learning standards - IEEE Standard for Learning Technology and Experience API - define their data models. From this analysis, we identify the advantages of using these e-Learning standards from the point of view of Learning Analytics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信